Tuesday, 8 September 2015

9/11

We are just a few days away from the 14th anniversary of 911. Around this time, every year, I try to post a little something on the subject - last year I posted "The Climate of Fear & 9/11 - Exposing the Greatest Cover-Up" - http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/the-climate-of-fear-911-exposing.html As each year goes by, I find it more difficult to add anything of significance (at least from my humble perspective) to the table. It has been a long journey of awakening for me with regards 9/11. Although I have never aligned myself to any 9/11 "movement" (I already had an inherent, in-built mistrust of such concepts long before I realised that most really couldn't be trusted!), I have metaphorically travelled a long and winding road paved with all kinds of proverbial dead-end cul-de-sacs of misinformation and "limited-hangouts." I feel I have come as close to understanding the true nature of 9/11 as I am currently able to. Who knows where I will end up in time - but I suspect the roads will always dovetail back upon my current perspectives. Where I now stand isn't about theories or circumstantial factors; it is about hard evidence that tells us definitively that what the world was told (and continues to be told en masse) about 9/11 is a monumental lie. Rather than hear it from me, it is best to take a few hours from your life and listen to those people who can explain it best. It is not always easy to learn the truth (it can "hurt" as the saying goes) but the benefits far outweigh the short-term discomforts. Your "world" is absolutely NOT what you think it is. You can choose to stick your fingers in your ears and hum real loud if you like. You can choose to live in blissful ignorance. Before you do, ask yourself a question. Do you like being lied to? Maybe it doesn't bother you. However, imagine being told the most colossal lie from somebody you have never doubted your trust in. Imagine how you would feel then. This was what 9/11 was (and still is) all about for me. It is, at least in my opinion, the greatest cover-up. It has cost so many lives, changed so much and caused so much pain and misery in every walk of life and every culture. It also conveniently buries much darker secrets about energy, consciousness and, perhaps, the very fabric of existence. It is our responsibility to dig our heads out of the sand and listen to the truth. Below is a collection of videos that will hopefully begin to open your eyes and minds.
Carl (The Truth Seeker's Guide)


Dr. Judy Wood - Breakthrough Energy Movement conference in Holland, 2012 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1NbBxDGSkI
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 1 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX6EUVnHxC8
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 2 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRhlnvlRZzU
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 3 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxl_OuO0aGs
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 4 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PpHyqNrmH4
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 5 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGYs1rbqrVI
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 6 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuEGbiHCqpU
RichplanetTV - Andrew Johnson discusses Where Did The Towers Go - 1 OF 3 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Su-2BhBP6EY
RichplanetTV - Andrew Johnson discusses Where Did The Towers Go - 2 OF 3 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll7jxfhPj-k
RichplanetTV - Andrew Johnson discusses Where Did The Towers Go - 3 OF 3 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brnRy-568ww
No Planes on 911 - Part 1 by Gari Jones -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9teNgS3oC4E
No Planes on 911 - Part 2 by Gari Jones -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Yq6bbTBNuQ
National Security Alert - The 9/11 Pentagon Event -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HlUmmPBoLg

Saturday, 5 September 2015

Comments by Lawrence R Spencer - Editor and Publisher of "Alien Interview"

I would like to draw your attention to an article I wrote in 2012 (over three years ago) entitled "The Star Trek Conspiracy - Part One"
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/star-trek-conspiracy-part-one.html
Lawrence R. Spencer (Editor and Publisher of the book "Alien Interview") has recently commented on the piece to raise some issues with part of the article where I refer to his book. Here is the section from the original article:


"Curiously (and as a postscript to the “Nine” narrative), I recently sat up and paid attention to some strange factors highlighted in the book “Alien Interview”, which is built around the accounts of Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy – who claimed to have interviewed an alien during the Roswell Incident of 1947. The book has several references to the concept of the “Council of Nine” and mention of a symbol that was ‘shown’ to her by the creature. The symbol is used throughout the design of the book and is eerily identical to the Starfleet insignia. Was it inspired by “The Nine” or was the Starfleet logo simply used to embellish MacElroy’s account?"

Comment by Lawrence R. Spencer (Editor and Publisher of "Alien Interview"):
"Your reference to the book ALIEN INTERVIEW says that it mentions a "Council of Nine". This is FALSE. There is no such reference in the interview transcripts with the Roswell UFO pilot, or by Nurse MacElroy who conducted the interviews. Further the "symbol" published in the book is a common symbol used the atheists. The original document I received from Nurse MacElroy did not include a drawing of the symbol of "The Domain". She provided only a verbal description. I arbitrarily used the symbol in the book as my sole and single addition to the text. Lawrence R. Spencer. Editor and Publisher of Alien Interview"

Here are the follow-up comments (I had to split it in half in order to post) with my response to Mr Spencer's original comment:
"RE: COMMENTS BY LAWRENCE R. SPENCER (part response)
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
This article was written three years ago at a time when I had not researched this subject as fully as I have now. I have not the opportunity (despite the amount of time) to redress the wording of this article. This does not constitute an "excuse" for not updating the article. I will address the points you have raised here and highlight the section in the article to refer the reader to these comments. I will also include a corrected addendum immediately after the section in question. I do not wish to alter the original section of the article as I believe in allowing the reader to view the article in its unrevised state. If I delete and alter this original article it looks like I am trying to "cover my tracks" and I will not do that. I believe in honesty and I wish people to see when I am in error.
The "false" information that you refer to was due to a pdf version of your book which had been re-edited by an anonymous writer who had included their own "information". Unfortunately, I took this to be part of your original book. Since then, I have obviously discarded this version and obtained the original version of your book.
As you point out, there are no references made to a "Council of Nine" in your book.
Nevertheless, I do believe that there are some comparable themes/synchronicities in the material you published relating to MacElroy and other material published with accounts from those who have claimed communication with "entities" associated with "The Nine" (the "Nine" discussed by the likes of Andrija Puharich, Phyllis Schlemmer, and the like.) A number of "Nine" devotees have described communication with artificial/machine-like entities. In chapter one of your book, Matilda O’Donnell MacElroy describes an entity as “like the body of a "doll" or "robot". There were no internal "organs", as the body was not constructed of biological cells. It did have a kind of "circuit" system or electrical nervous that ran throughout the body, but I could not understand how it worked.”
She also says, “There was no verbal communication possible with the alien.” The ‘Official Transcript of Interview’ describes communication “THROUGH MIND /THOUGHT.” Alleged communication with entities claiming to be “The Nine” has been conducted in a seemingly “thought/mind” manner – via intermediaries and so forth. On occasion, these communications may have been conducted via electronic devices (i.e.: the telephone, etc.)
The inclusion of “a psychic research scientist” during the interview is comparable as psychics were heavily involved with alleged “Nine” communications AND the associated SRI research into psychic phenomenon.
CONTINUED IN NEXT COMMENT…
RE: COMMENTS BY LAWRENCE R. SPENCER (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS COMMENT)
…The following sections are also comparable:
"Airl told me her reasons for coming to Earth and for being in the area of the 509th Bomber Squadron. She was sent by her superior officers to investigate the explosions of nuclear weapons which have been tested in New Mexico. Her superiors ordered her to gather information from the atmosphere that could be used to determine the extent of radiation and potential harm this might cause to the environment.”
On page 139 of “The Only Planet of Choice”, the entity Tom (an alleged ‘Nine’ representative) expressed concern over the use of nuclear weapons and their effect on the environment.
To be honest these latter commonalities (thought communication, nuclear weapons, etc.) are inherent to many recalled accounts of alleged “extra-terrestrial” contact.
In your original comment you said “The original document I received from Nurse MacElroy did not include a drawing of the symbol of ‘The Domain.’” In the section of your book “The Letter from Mrs. MacElroy”, “This is the symbol of ‘The Domain’” The symbol I have referred to in my article – and the one you have used throughout the book – is shown on the same line directly after the word “Domain.” As you pointed out, “She provided only a verbal description. I arbitrarily used the symbol in the book as my sole and single addition to the text.”
I accept your word that this was an arbitrary choice. Yet it is unfortunate that it does infer that this is the symbol associated with “The Domain” referred to in the account. For the purpose of clarification, did this arbitrary symbol in any way match the description given to you by Nurse MacElroy? In any case the symbol is significant in the context of my article.
Whilst it may be a “common symbol used the atheists”, it is highly comparable with versions of the Star Trek/Starfleet logo. In fact, I would argue that if you showed the symbol included in your book to people (out of context, of course) there are a great many who would firstly mistake it for the Starfleet logo.
Whilst I am not trying to attach Star Trek to Nurse MacElroy’s account or your book, I can EVIDENTIALLY connect Star Trek to the Lab Nine phenomenon. In fact, despite the evidential trail beginning in 1974, there is a circumstantial trail that dates back to the very conception of the Star Trek franchise. It can also be demonstrated that those with a belief in “The Nine” had an influence over people like Gene Roddenberry and also over the shape of the Star Trek franchise.
These are the points that I should have made in this early article. The error here is that I should have said that I believe there is a commonality between some of the material in your book, Star Trek and (by extension) the Lab Nine phenomenon – even if it is purely circumstantial. For that oversight, I apologize. Fortunately, I have subsequently made these points in great detail in public talks and in my book “Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda”. I am currently updating this book and will include your comments, my own, and correct the original oversight. Once again, I apologize for any grievances this may have caused you.
Regards,
Carl."


I would like to point out (as many of my regular readers will know) that I am not afraid to change my perspectives on things when new and more verifiable evidence comes to my attention. Even my book "Science Fiction and the Global Agenda" has a number of subjects that I have now revised my views on (including some of the Star Trek material.) I began writing the book itself two and a half years ago and it was published over a year ago.

I have attempted to cover new evidence in my recent talks and always try to post new evidence on this blog as it becomes available. However, naturally, there will always be oversights - especially in much older articles. As I pointed out in my reply to Mr Spencer, I won't alter or remove older articles even if they may contain errors. My articles are a document of all I have written – warts and all. They are also an archive and providing people take the time to look, they will find the amendments in newer articles. I will try (although lord knows when as it is a hefty job) to add links in older articles to newer amendments for the sake of continuity.

I am currently finishing up a new edition of the book which will correct any oversights or changed perspectives (incorporating new evidence.) It is understandable that some things will creep in every now and again that need tweaking - particularly with a book the size of mine. I actually managed to get the date of the alleged Apollo 11 "moon landing" wrong in the first draft although how I managed that I don't know!

In the past, people have contacted me and given my ear-ache over the non-inclusion of material that THEY feel I should post here and in my book. In most of these cases, they have wanted me to discuss disinformation and that I will not do. They have also wanted me revise my perspectives on persons or groups of questionable character and motive. I will not censor my work to suit the agendas of others. If I do, I may as well stop now and never do anymore research.

However, in the case of Mr Spencer, he has raised a valid point about the “Council of Nine” NOT being mentioned in his book. I understand the need for legitimate researchers to defend the integrity of their work – I try to do it myself. Although I was originally under the false impression that “The Nine” were mentioned, I am now aware of that error and am happy to apologise and correct the error here and in the updated edition of my book.The moral of this story – don’t trust dodgy pdf versions of books. It may end up costing a lot of money but the paperbacks are, at least, verifiable. When will I learn that people edit everything on the internet - even the most seemingly reliable sources? I should know better by now!

All the best,
Carl (The Truth Seeker’s Guide)

Truth Seeker Updates - Sept 2015

It has been several months since I posted anything here on the blog and it felt like the right time to explain my absence! I have been incredibly busy with a multitude of projects – some of which have been delayed by the usual restrictions of having to go to work and a few bouts of illness and back problems – but I won’t bore you with! I’m now starting to make some headway on the aforementioned projects which means you will hopefully see the fruits of my labours shortly. Firstly, I have been updating my book “Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda”. I am always gathering up new research material on this subject and decided it was time to incorporate the new material into a new edition as the original was starting to feel a little "dated". My regular readers will know that I have revised some of the conclusions I came to (in the book) regarding Stanley Kubrick and his possible connections to the NASA/Apollo cover-up and it is only fair that people know where I now stand on this subject. I have also dug deep into the “limited hangout” that orchestrates much of the disinformation surrounding the Kubrick/Apollo subject and managed to shed some light on its true nature. I have discussed this in my most recent talks on Kubrick and now have the opportunity to fully explore the subject in the updated version of the book. I am also incorporating several brand new sub-topics into the book that weren't covered in the original. I will be posting links to the new edition of the book (and, all being well, a kindle/amazon version) as soon as it is completed. Hopefully, that will be in a month or two's time.

On the subject of the book, I am hoping to record two interviews with Richard D. Hall for his excellent Richplanet TV show in early October. Provisionally, the subjects will be Stanley Kubrick and (respectively) the whole Gene Roddenberry/Andrija Puharich/Lab Nine subject. If all goes according to plan, I will post links on the blog when these shows are aired. I also have a couple of other interviews with other researchers in the pipeline – although I have to admit I haven’t had the opportunity to get back in touch with them to make the arrangements – so watch this space.


My musical work is pretty crammed at present. Most importantly, the songs I have written (with a relevance to the subjects I cover here) have languished in “recording hell” for over a year now. I am making progress but it is very laborious and subject to the restrictions on my time. This will be another project to watch this space for! I’m also currently working on the very early stages of a fictional novel which relates to some of my experiences in the jobbing world of music gig performance. I wouldn’t normally consider such a project (given that I have enough on my plate at the moment!), but the genesis for the plot (actually a love story, of all things) came to me in its complete form in a dream. I related the story to a few trusted friend and they told me that I HAD to write it. They seem to think it is quite good, but we will see. Given the nature of how it originated, I would be remiss if I didn’t at least try to follow it through. If and when this develops, I will let you know.


Several months back, I began working on a YouTube film which examines the phenomenon of Saturn Worship in contemporary culture – called “CubeRing”. I was making good progress and announced (at a few talks) that the film would be available by now. Unfortunately, I have had to delay the project (simply through lack of time) but I intent to get back to it in a month or so. I will post the link on the blog when it is completed and available to watch.


A year ago, I was asked by a number of readers to post the Ridley Scott material (from my book) on the blog. I fully intended to do this but somehow that also got lost in the midst of time! Fortunately, updating the book has allowed me to add some new material to the subject and I will begin posting this in the next week. The response to the book and my last few talks has been amazing. I feel truly blessed to be connected with so many people who get some of the proverbial “bigger picture” and make an effort to understand our “reality” in a manner contrary to that which we regularly have forced upon us. I often wonder what could be achieved if many more people abandoned the “indoctrination” and “worldview warfare” and started to “think outside the box”. There is much we can accomplish in our own daily lives once we accept and embrace the realisations, but consider how this might manifest if it occurred on a mass scale. The possibilities would be limitless! Let’s keep working toward the possibility of a realisation of that day.


In the meantime, stay well and my best wishes to you all!
Carl (The Truthseeker’s Guide)