A Fake Confession of Stanley Kubrick's Moon Fakery

I have been asked by a number of people over the last week what my thoughts are on an interview that has appeared on YouTube purportedly showing an interview with Stanley Kubrick (shot shortly before his death) where he claims to have been involved with faking the footage of the Apollo moon landings. Firstly, before I explain my position on this video, I want to state where I currently stand on the subject of Kubrick and the Apollo hoax. I am firmly of the belief that something about the NASA Apollo missions was and still is being covered up. I am not sure exactly what has been and is being covered up, but I am convinced by the sheer volume of evidence that fakery of some kind was employed to muddle/cover up something. In a nutshell, I don’t believe that NASA did - with the Apollo missions - all that they say they did.

As for Kubrick, it is a little less cut and dried. Over the last six to twelve months I have garnered a degree of attention due to articles I’ve written and talks and interviews I’ve given on the subject of Kubrick and the NASA/Apollo connection. It is a subject that I have truly immersed myself in (research wise) probably due in great part to my lifelong fascination with the films of Kubrick and, to some extent, an interest in the life of the man himself. Recently, on occasion, I have been misquoted as a researcher who “believes that Kubrick faked the Apollo moon landings.”

I currently DO NOT KNOW if he did.

I am a researcher who likes evidence to back up my assertions. I will not tailor evidence to fit a belief or opinion. Very simply, I will only state an absolute position on grounds that verifiably evidence points to. That is not to say that I don’t have opinions or speculations about the matter. It wouldn’t surprise me if Kubrick was in some way involved with the Apollo cover-up, although I don’t think there is enough evidence to close the book on the case as the majority of the evidence to support his involvement is pretty much circumstantial. There is, however, far more solid and quantifiable evidence to show that Kubrick KNEW OF the Apollo cover-up – even if he wasn’t involved. If you want to look at this evidence, I suggest you watch my interview with Richard D Hall (Carl James on Stanley Kubrick - 1 of 4 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gidrZT_AXwg ), my 2 hour talk at Birmingham Truth Juice (The Kubrick Conundrum 1/2 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipRkQFWEvSA ), my Kubrick blog series  (http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-stanley-kubrick-conspiracy-part-1.html - if you scroll to the bottom of this article you will find links to all eight parts of the series plus links to supplementary articles), and my book “Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda” (a new edition with loads of updated Kubrick material will be available very soon.)

So, to the video! I didn’t initially feel any compulsion to comment on this interview as it seemed pretty obvious from the get go that it was fake and I assumed that most people would recognise this as well. However, there are plenty of people out there who are stil lauding this as the genuine article. For the benefit of getting this story straight, I will break things down. There are some interesting points worth raising about the timing of this video which I come to shortly. Here is the full 27 minute length interview (entitled “fghfghfgfgfgfg”) on this YouTube channel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KPHRpFFRDUk Take a few minutes to shut your eyes and listen to the man being passed off as Kubrick. Listen to the pitch of his voice, his enunciation, his “New York” twang and then compare them to established recordings of Kubrick. For example: Stanley Kubrick Interview (27th November 1966) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xa-KBqOFgDQ or Stanley Kubrick talks about 'The Shining' in 11-minute 1980 interview [audio] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=keo5HQcC0po Now let’s go to his physical attributes. The man in the video in question lacks the same facial structure (including nose, mole, etc.) as the real Kubrick. Again, you can compare the two (more accurately in this case) by looking at his speech upon accepting the DW Griffith Award around the same time period as the alleged video. Another (pretty BIG!) giveaway is in the faked video itself at 14:09 when “Kubrick” is called “Tom” by the interviewer and told “you have to imitate him”.

I had a bit of a laugh about this video because there does appear to be precedent for multiple Stanley Kubrick impersonators. Check out the story of Alan Conway who went around passing himself off as Kubrick - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Conway . The timing of the release of this video is interesting for several reasons. Firstly, it comes hot on the heels of the announced US release of the movie Moonwalkers, the plot of which centres on the use of a piss-poor Kubrick doppelganger to fool a CIA agent who wants to hire Kubrick to fake Apollo moon footage. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moonwalkers_(film)
Recent events got me thinking about misdirection and the discrediting of any notion that Kubrick may have been involved (or even known about) the Apollo cover-up. I was then reminded about the purported Roswell alien autopsy footage which convinced many of its alleged legitimacy. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNfHRPEb4mU . Then, of course, we eventually had (not unlike “Moonwalkers”) a quasi-comedy film starring Ant McPartlin and Declan Donnelly called “Alien Autopsy” which muddled matters even more – most notably in the final section of the film when it is revealed that all the fakery was based on a allegedly real piece of footage that once existed. With this in mind, I now wonder if there may actually have been a real interview with Kubrick that once existed, one that may have held a confession or two. It may not have confirmed his involvement with Apollo fakery, but it may have revealed what he did know and his intentional embedding of clues to the matter in his films. I must make it clear that I am speculating at this point.

There is something much more solid about the timing though. Not to toot my own horn, but I have made great strides in exposing a “limited hangout” in relation to the Kubrick/Apollo cover-up subject. Although not on the same scale, it is comparable to the limited hangout that exists in the so-called 9/11 truth movement and aspects of Ufology. Although I have yet to nail down the true intentions of this hangout, I do know that they have at least two aims. One is to convince people that there was no discussion or articulation of a possible connection between Kubrick and the Apollo hoax subject before the early-mid 1990s - a conviction I have now 100 percent evidentially disproved. The second has been to generically muddle the entire subject to such a degree that people will stop digging and write it all off as mere “synchronicities” or wild “conspiracy theorizing.” I have managed to make quite a few people aware of the aforementioned limited hangout (along with some of their agenda) and the word does now appear to be spreading. For now though, we must remain vigilant. Like the whole “Flat Earth” thing, there are many people being suckered by videos with large viewing figures that (whilst initially intriguing) are total disinformation designed to mislead those who are susceptible to mild persuasion. I very much accept the idea that there may be a day when we can evidentially prove that Kubrick or somebody not unlike him in Hollywood helped to fake aspects of the Apollo footage. However, I also believe that such evidence will surface via a huge amount of cross-referencing of material from multiple disciplines and historical records. If there ever was a confession made, I doubt it will ever land in our lap in a ready-made form. You never know though!

All the best for now!
Carl.

New Richplanet TV with Andrew Johnson

Here are the links and details to episodes 212 and 213 of Richplanet TV. Richard D. Hall interviews Andrew Johnson about new theories on planetary formation, and the possible connection between the crop circle phenomenon and directed energy weapons (respectively.) Please take the time to watch if you haven't already. The subjects are fascinating and thoroughly researched by Andrew.

Richplanet TV Show No. 212: Andrew Johnson: Formation of Planets - A New Theory
Geology and planetary science have given explanations for the creation of the Earth. Allegedly 4 billion years ago there was a hot mass of material which gradually formed into the Earth and cooled over millions of years. New evidence may suggest the Earth may have been completely different in its early stages. Today's programme explores a theory put forward by researcher Peter Woodhead who suggests a completely different sequence of events to arrive at today's Earth. The theory seems to tie many loose ends together, such as "where did the oceans come from", "why do planets become gas giants", "why do the continents fit together", "was gravity lower in the time of the dinosaurs" and "is gravity what we think". Andrew Johnson has worked with Peter Woodhead to help derive equations to explain how gravity works in this new model. They have authored two papers on the new theory. http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=212&part=1
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=212&part=2
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=212&part=3
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=212&part=4
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=212&part=5
(Please note that part 5 is the unaired on TV, conclusive part of this interview)

Richplanet TV Show No. 213: Andrew Johnson: Crop Circles & Energy Weapons
Andrew Johnson joins Richard to discuss his latest research. Dr Wood's book, "Where Did the Towers Go" shows that the twin towers were disappeared using an energy weapon. One of the peculiarities of the 9/11 aftermath was the presence of iron micro-spheres. These are tiny spheres of pure iron found in the dust, which, if the official story is true should not be there. Iron micro-spheres of about the same size have also been discovered in the ground by scientists where crop circles have formed. Is it possible there is a link between the creation of unexplained crop circles and the energy weapon used to destroy the world trade centre? Further evidence also points to a possible link between the 9/11 weapon and crop circle formation. Could this link provide a long awaited explanation for many of the non planked (sometimes called "genuine") crop circles?http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=213&part=1
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=213&part=2
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=213&part=3
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=213&part=4

RIP Dave McGowan

As a musician and fan of music (along with years of blind, musician "hero worship" behind me), I am totally in the debt of the researcher Dave McGowan. His research into the Laurel Canyon scene (amongst other things) opened my eyes to the true nature of the music industry and the machinations of the global elite. In my own musical working life, I have sometimes encountered bizarre situations and people whose behaviour and attitudes defy all logic and reason. Dave's research gave me the insight to understand what I may have unwittingly experienced (even from my cursory position on the very outer edges of the music scene) over the last 20 years. During my own research, I have  found it reassuring to know that if I ever wanted to confirm some darker or mysterious connection to the Canyon scene I could rely on his tireless and comprehensive research to point me in the right direction. It is therefore a very sad day for me when I should learn that Dave has passed away. His departure into the infinite consciousness will leave a great hole amongst those of us left here. However, his work will always remain. If you haven't already, please take the time check it out. I huge portion of his research is gathered here: http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

Carl James interview on Richplanet TV

Here are the links to my two interviews with Richard D. Hall for Richplanet TV. Hope you find them interesting!
Best wishes,
Carl.
Stanley Kubrick & The Moon Landings - Show No. 210
Part 1 - http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=210&part=1
Part 2 - http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=210&part=2
Part 3 - http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=210&part=3
Part 4 - http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=210&part=4
NASA Puppets, space travel & perception management - Show No. 211
Part 1 - http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=211&part=1
Part 2 - http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=211&part=2
Part 3 - http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=211&part=3
Part 4 - http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=211&part=4

Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

Richplanet TV Returns - Nov 2015

Richard D Hall's excellent Richplanet TV is returning to television screens this week. The first episode in this 12 week run will be broadcast at 11pm tonight (Tuesday 3rd November 2015.) The show will be available on Sky channel 261, Freesat 402 & Freeview 254. Myself and Andrew Johnson travelled to Richard's new studio in early October to record episodes for this series. I had a great time recording my interviews and I just wanted to say a huge thank you to Richard and his family for making me so welcome. Huge thanks also to Andrew for making it possible for me get there in the first place! My recorded interviews comprise two episodes of the new show, cover a generic discussion of all things Stanley Kubrick and Star Trek (respectively) and will be somewhat familiar to those people who have read some of my articles, watched some of my talks and read my book. I hope you enjoy the interviews. I also want to remind people to keep an eye out for Andrew's two interviews in this series. The subjects are fascinating and well worth watching. Although I am somewhat bias, I have always maintained that Richplanet TV is just about the only show worth turning on a television for. Richard's subjects aim at the heart of the truth, asking informed questions, and exposing so many of the control mechanisms and cover-ups that exist in our world. I only hope that you will consider my research a worthy addition to that of those people who have already contributed to the show. For those of you unable to catch the TV airing of the new series, Richard will no doubt upload these new episodes to his website: http://www.richplanet.net In the past, these episodes have usually appeared within a week of the aired show so keep an eye out there. After the 12 week TV series, Richard will be embarking on another UK Tour in February 2016. Ticket details here: http://www.richplanet.net/events.php#2016tour

9/11

We are just a few days away from the 14th anniversary of 911. Around this time, every year, I try to post a little something on the subject - last year I posted "The Climate of Fear & 9/11 - Exposing the Greatest Cover-Up" - http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/the-climate-of-fear-911-exposing.html As each year goes by, I find it more difficult to add anything of significance (at least from my humble perspective) to the table. It has been a long journey of awakening for me with regards 9/11. Although I have never aligned myself to any 9/11 "movement" (I already had an inherent, in-built mistrust of such concepts long before I realised that most really couldn't be trusted!), I have metaphorically travelled a long and winding road paved with all kinds of proverbial dead-end cul-de-sacs of misinformation and "limited-hangouts." I feel I have come as close to understanding the true nature of 9/11 as I am currently able to. Who knows where I will end up in time - but I suspect the roads will always dovetail back upon my current perspectives. Where I now stand isn't about theories or circumstantial factors; it is about hard evidence that tells us definitively that what the world was told (and continues to be told en masse) about 9/11 is a monumental lie. Rather than hear it from me, it is best to take a few hours from your life and listen to those people who can explain it best. It is not always easy to learn the truth (it can "hurt" as the saying goes) but the benefits far outweigh the short-term discomforts. Your "world" is absolutely NOT what you think it is. You can choose to stick your fingers in your ears and hum real loud if you like. You can choose to live in blissful ignorance. Before you do, ask yourself a question. Do you like being lied to? Maybe it doesn't bother you. However, imagine being told the most colossal lie from somebody you have never doubted your trust in. Imagine how you would feel then. This was what 9/11 was (and still is) all about for me. It is, at least in my opinion, the greatest cover-up. It has cost so many lives, changed so much and caused so much pain and misery in every walk of life and every culture. It also conveniently buries much darker secrets about energy, consciousness and, perhaps, the very fabric of existence. It is our responsibility to dig our heads out of the sand and listen to the truth. Below is a collection of videos that will hopefully begin to open your eyes and minds.
Carl (The Truth Seeker's Guide)

Dr. Judy Wood - Breakthrough Energy Movement conference in Holland, 2012 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T1NbBxDGSkI
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 1 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IX6EUVnHxC8
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 2 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yRhlnvlRZzU
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 3 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxl_OuO0aGs
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 4 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PpHyqNrmH4
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 5 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGYs1rbqrVI
RichplanetTV - Dr. Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph.D. - 6 OF 6 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SuEGbiHCqpU
RichplanetTV - Andrew Johnson discusses Where Did The Towers Go - 1 OF 3 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Su-2BhBP6EY
RichplanetTV - Andrew Johnson discusses Where Did The Towers Go - 2 OF 3 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ll7jxfhPj-k
RichplanetTV - Andrew Johnson discusses Where Did The Towers Go - 3 OF 3 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brnRy-568ww
No Planes on 911 - Part 1 by Gari Jones -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9teNgS3oC4E
No Planes on 911 - Part 2 by Gari Jones -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Yq6bbTBNuQ
National Security Alert - The 9/11 Pentagon Event -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HlUmmPBoLg


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

Comments by Lawrence R Spencer - Editor and Publisher of "Alien Interview"

I would like to draw your attention to an article I wrote in 2012 (over three years ago) entitled "The Star Trek Conspiracy - Part One"
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/06/star-trek-conspiracy-part-one.html
Lawrence R. Spencer (Editor and Publisher of the book "Alien Interview") has recently commented on the piece to raise some issues with part of the article where I refer to his book. Here is the section from the original article:

"Curiously (and as a postscript to the “Nine” narrative), I recently sat up and paid attention to some strange factors highlighted in the book “Alien Interview”, which is built around the accounts of Matilda O'Donnell MacElroy – who claimed to have interviewed an alien during the Roswell Incident of 1947. The book has several references to the concept of the “Council of Nine” and mention of a symbol that was ‘shown’ to her by the creature. The symbol is used throughout the design of the book and is eerily identical to the Starfleet insignia. Was it inspired by “The Nine” or was the Starfleet logo simply used to embellish MacElroy’s account?"

Comment by Lawrence R. Spencer (Editor and Publisher of "Alien Interview"):
"Your reference to the book ALIEN INTERVIEW says that it mentions a "Council of Nine". This is FALSE. There is no such reference in the interview transcripts with the Roswell UFO pilot, or by Nurse MacElroy who conducted the interviews. Further the "symbol" published in the book is a common symbol used the atheists. The original document I received from Nurse MacElroy did not include a drawing of the symbol of "The Domain". She provided only a verbal description. I arbitrarily used the symbol in the book as my sole and single addition to the text. Lawrence R. Spencer. Editor and Publisher of Alien Interview"

Here are the follow-up comments (I had to split it in half in order to post) with my response to Mr Spencer's original comment:
"RE: COMMENTS BY LAWRENCE R. SPENCER (part response)
Thank you for taking the time to comment.
This article was written three years ago at a time when I had not researched this subject as fully as I have now. I have not the opportunity (despite the amount of time) to redress the wording of this article. This does not constitute an "excuse" for not updating the article. I will address the points you have raised here and highlight the section in the article to refer the reader to these comments. I will also include a corrected addendum immediately after the section in question. I do not wish to alter the original section of the article as I believe in allowing the reader to view the article in its unrevised state. If I delete and alter this original article it looks like I am trying to "cover my tracks" and I will not do that. I believe in honesty and I wish people to see when I am in error.
The "false" information that you refer to was due to a pdf version of your book which had been re-edited by an anonymous writer who had included their own "information". Unfortunately, I took this to be part of your original book. Since then, I have obviously discarded this version and obtained the original version of your book.
As you point out, there are no references made to a "Council of Nine" in your book.
Nevertheless, I do believe that there are some comparable themes/synchronicities in the material you published relating to MacElroy and other material published with accounts from those who have claimed communication with "entities" associated with "The Nine" (the "Nine" discussed by the likes of Andrija Puharich, Phyllis Schlemmer, and the like.) A number of "Nine" devotees have described communication with artificial/machine-like entities. In chapter one of your book, Matilda O’Donnell MacElroy describes an entity as “like the body of a "doll" or "robot". There were no internal "organs", as the body was not constructed of biological cells. It did have a kind of "circuit" system or electrical nervous that ran throughout the body, but I could not understand how it worked.”
She also says, “There was no verbal communication possible with the alien.” The ‘Official Transcript of Interview’ describes communication “THROUGH MIND /THOUGHT.” Alleged communication with entities claiming to be “The Nine” has been conducted in a seemingly “thought/mind” manner – via intermediaries and so forth. On occasion, these communications may have been conducted via electronic devices (i.e.: the telephone, etc.)
The inclusion of “a psychic research scientist” during the interview is comparable as psychics were heavily involved with alleged “Nine” communications AND the associated SRI research into psychic phenomenon.
CONTINUED IN NEXT COMMENT…
RE: COMMENTS BY LAWRENCE R. SPENCER (CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS COMMENT)
…The following sections are also comparable:
"Airl told me her reasons for coming to Earth and for being in the area of the 509th Bomber Squadron. She was sent by her superior officers to investigate the explosions of nuclear weapons which have been tested in New Mexico. Her superiors ordered her to gather information from the atmosphere that could be used to determine the extent of radiation and potential harm this might cause to the environment.”
On page 139 of “The Only Planet of Choice”, the entity Tom (an alleged ‘Nine’ representative) expressed concern over the use of nuclear weapons and their effect on the environment.
To be honest these latter commonalities (thought communication, nuclear weapons, etc.) are inherent to many recalled accounts of alleged “extra-terrestrial” contact.
In your original comment you said “The original document I received from Nurse MacElroy did not include a drawing of the symbol of ‘The Domain.’” In the section of your book “The Letter from Mrs. MacElroy”, “This is the symbol of ‘The Domain’” The symbol I have referred to in my article – and the one you have used throughout the book – is shown on the same line directly after the word “Domain.” As you pointed out, “She provided only a verbal description. I arbitrarily used the symbol in the book as my sole and single addition to the text.”
I accept your word that this was an arbitrary choice. Yet it is unfortunate that it does infer that this is the symbol associated with “The Domain” referred to in the account. For the purpose of clarification, did this arbitrary symbol in any way match the description given to you by Nurse MacElroy? In any case the symbol is significant in the context of my article.
Whilst it may be a “common symbol used the atheists”, it is highly comparable with versions of the Star Trek/Starfleet logo. In fact, I would argue that if you showed the symbol included in your book to people (out of context, of course) there are a great many who would firstly mistake it for the Starfleet logo.
Whilst I am not trying to attach Star Trek to Nurse MacElroy’s account or your book, I can EVIDENTIALLY connect Star Trek to the Lab Nine phenomenon. In fact, despite the evidential trail beginning in 1974, there is a circumstantial trail that dates back to the very conception of the Star Trek franchise. It can also be demonstrated that those with a belief in “The Nine” had an influence over people like Gene Roddenberry and also over the shape of the Star Trek franchise.
These are the points that I should have made in this early article. The error here is that I should have said that I believe there is a commonality between some of the material in your book, Star Trek and (by extension) the Lab Nine phenomenon – even if it is purely circumstantial. For that oversight, I apologize. Fortunately, I have subsequently made these points in great detail in public talks and in my book “Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda”. I am currently updating this book and will include your comments, my own, and correct the original oversight. Once again, I apologize for any grievances this may have caused you.
Regards,
Carl."

I would like to point out (as many of my regular readers will know) that I am not afraid to change my perspectives on things when new and more verifiable evidence comes to my attention. Even my book "Science Fiction and the Global Agenda" has a number of subjects that I have now revised my views on (including some of the Star Trek material.) I began writing the book itself two and a half years ago and it was published over a year ago.

I have attempted to cover new evidence in my recent talks and always try to post new evidence on this blog as it becomes available. However, naturally, there will always be oversights - especially in much older articles. As I pointed out in my reply to Mr Spencer, I won't alter or remove older articles even if they may contain errors. My articles are a document of all I have written – warts and all. They are also an archive and providing people take the time to look, they will find the amendments in newer articles. I will try (although lord knows when as it is a hefty job) to add links in older articles to newer amendments for the sake of continuity.

I am currently finishing up a new edition of the book which will correct any oversights or changed perspectives (incorporating new evidence.) It is understandable that some things will creep in every now and again that need tweaking - particularly with a book the size of mine. I actually managed to get the date of the alleged Apollo 11 "moon landing" wrong in the first draft although how I managed that I don't know!

In the past, people have contacted me and given my ear-ache over the non-inclusion of material that THEY feel I should post here and in my book. In most of these cases, they have wanted me to discuss disinformation and that I will not do. They have also wanted me revise my perspectives on persons or groups of questionable character and motive. I will not censor my work to suit the agendas of others. If I do, I may as well stop now and never do anymore research.

However, in the case of Mr Spencer, he has raised a valid point about the “Council of Nine” NOT being mentioned in his book. I understand the need for legitimate researchers to defend the integrity of their work – I try to do it myself. Although I was originally under the false impression that “The Nine” were mentioned, I am now aware of that error and am happy to apologise and correct the error here and in the updated edition of my book.The moral of this story – don’t trust dodgy pdf versions of books. It may end up costing a lot of money but the paperbacks are, at least, verifiable. When will I learn that people edit everything on the internet - even the most seemingly reliable sources? I should know better by now!

All the best,
Carl (The Truth Seeker’s Guide)


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

Truth Seeker Updates - Sept 2015

It has been several months since I posted anything here on the blog and it felt like the right time to explain my absence! I have been incredibly busy with a multitude of projects – some of which have been delayed by the usual restrictions of having to go to work and a few bouts of illness and back problems – but I won’t bore you with! I’m now starting to make some headway on the aforementioned projects which means you will hopefully see the fruits of my labours shortly. Firstly, I have been updating my book “Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda”. I am always gathering up new research material on this subject and decided it was time to incorporate the new material into a new edition as the original was starting to feel a little "dated". My regular readers will know that I have revised some of the conclusions I came to (in the book) regarding Stanley Kubrick and his possible connections to the NASA/Apollo cover-up and it is only fair that people know where I now stand on this subject. I have also dug deep into the “limited hangout” that orchestrates much of the disinformation surrounding the Kubrick/Apollo subject and managed to shed some light on its true nature. I have discussed this in my most recent talks on Kubrick and now have the opportunity to fully explore the subject in the updated version of the book. I am also incorporating several brand new sub-topics into the book that weren't covered in the original. I will be posting links to the new edition of the book (and, all being well, a kindle/amazon version) as soon as it is completed. Hopefully, that will be in a month or two's time.

On the subject of the book, I am hoping to record two interviews with Richard D. Hall for his excellent Richplanet TV show in early October. Provisionally, the subjects will be Stanley Kubrick and (respectively) the whole Gene Roddenberry/Andrija Puharich/Lab Nine subject. If all goes according to plan, I will post links on the blog when these shows are aired. I also have a couple of other interviews with other researchers in the pipeline – although I have to admit I haven’t had the opportunity to get back in touch with them to make the arrangements – so watch this space.

My musical work is pretty crammed at present. Most importantly, the songs I have written (with a relevance to the subjects I cover here) have languished in “recording hell” for over a year now. I am making progress but it is very laborious and subject to the restrictions on my time. This will be another project to watch this space for! I’m also currently working on the very early stages of a fictional novel which relates to some of my experiences in the jobbing world of music gig performance. I wouldn’t normally consider such a project (given that I have enough on my plate at the moment!), but the genesis for the plot (actually a love story, of all things) came to me in its complete form in a dream. I related the story to a few trusted friend and they told me that I HAD to write it. They seem to think it is quite good, but we will see. Given the nature of how it originated, I would be remiss if I didn’t at least try to follow it through. If and when this develops, I will let you know.

Several months back, I began working on a YouTube film which examines the phenomenon of Saturn Worship in contemporary culture – called “CubeRing”. I was making good progress and announced (at a few talks) that the film would be available by now. Unfortunately, I have had to delay the project (simply through lack of time) but I intent to get back to it in a month or so. I will post the link on the blog when it is completed and available to watch.

A year ago, I was asked by a number of readers to post the Ridley Scott material (from my book) on the blog. I fully intended to do this but somehow that also got lost in the midst of time! Fortunately, updating the book has allowed me to add some new material to the subject and I will begin posting this in the next week. The response to the book and my last few talks has been amazing. I feel truly blessed to be connected with so many people who get some of the proverbial “bigger picture” and make an effort to understand our “reality” in a manner contrary to that which we regularly have forced upon us. I often wonder what could be achieved if many more people abandoned the “indoctrination” and “worldview warfare” and started to “think outside the box”. There is much we can accomplish in our own daily lives once we accept and embrace the realisations, but consider how this might manifest if it occurred on a mass scale. The possibilities would be limitless! Let’s keep working toward the possibility of a realisation of that day.

In the meantime, stay well and my best wishes to you all!
Carl (The Truthseeker’s Guide)

Richard D. Hall - Cumbria Shootings 5th Anniversary

As Richard D. Hall (the tireless researcher and host of RichplanetTV) has reminded us, we are less than a week away from the 5th anniversary of the Cumbria shootings. Richard notes: "Don't let mainstream media get away with reminding people of their bogus official story. PLEASE help bring awareness of the truth about this case by sending these links to as many people as you can BEFORE they repeat their propaganda next week." The links he refers to are for his most recent film "PATSY DRIVER - The Cumbria Shootings." The links are below and well worth taking the time to watch. Anybody who has been duped by the "official" story of these events will get a real eye-opener with this film. I was asked late last year what my response would be if I was able to impart a gem of insight to others, but could only answer with half a dozen or so words. My answer: "Never trust the media!" I still find it staggering that apathy and intellectual "lockdown" leads so many people to totally believe and trust the cow-dung that they have thrown their way every single time they turn on a TV set. I try (and, believe me, there are many ways to do it!) to show people just how divisive, subversive and (yes, I won't hesitate to use this word these days) dangerous the media really is. "Patsy Driver" effectively reflects my own convictions on this subject along with several other equally disturbing factors.

• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=205&part=1
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=205&part=2
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=205&part=3
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=205&part=4

Whilst on the subject of media propaganda, it is also worth checking out Richard's latest film about Madeleine McCann: The Phantoms - The True Story of Madeleine McCann. Yet more excellent and insightful research is revealed here:

• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=204&part=1
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=204&part=2
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=204&part=3
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=204&part=4
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=204&part=5

I also want to point out one of Richard's other projects currently in the development stages: The Richplanet Energy Research Project. For more information check out this episode of RichplanetTV:

• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=203&part=1
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=203&part=2
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=203&part=3
• http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=203&part=4

The Kubrick Conundrum @ TruthJuice Nottingham - 10/06/15

For those of you in the UK, I will be speaking at TruthJuice Nottingham on Wednesday 10^th June 2015 and presenting:

The Kubrick Conundrum
“Stanley Kubrick – a visionary filmmaker who enthralled cinema goers with such classic films as Spartacus, Dr Strangelove, 2001: A Space Odyssey, A Clockwork Orange, Barry Lyndon, The Shining, Full Metal Jacket and Eyes Wide Shut. However, Kubrick was far more than a Hollywood legend. In this presentation, Carl James will examine Kubrick’s fascination with symbolism (such as Saturn, masonry, the secret schools and numerology) and agenda driven themes (such as mind control and various elite control mechanisms.) The presentation will also analyse Kubrick’s associations with NASA and the military industrial complex and the possibility that he was in some way involved with NASA’s Apollo Lunar fakery. Carl will also dissect Kubrick’s final film “Eyes Wide Shut” and discuss the possibility that the revelations espoused in the film may have resulted in his untimely death. Drawn from several years of in-depth research, combined with recently uncovered evidence that has received little exposure, this presentation is not to be missed!”

Kubrick is one of my ongoing “pet” research projects and it seems that there is not a month that goes by when I don’t uncover yet more fascinating material on the subject. So, for those of you who have watched my TruthJuice Birmingham videos of this talk, I should point out that I have even more to bring to the Kubrick “table” with this talk.

Arrive from 7pm to start at 7.30pm

Admission: £5 or £3 Concessions.

Truth Juice is NON PROFIT MAKING, and ALL monies are put back into the organisation of future talks/presentations.

Age restrictions: No Minors

PAYMENT TO RESERVE TICKETS: PAYPAL

TRUTHJUICE@SUBTLEBODIES.CO.UK

Booking: Lynda Martin 07723317195

Facebook: TruthJuice Nottingham - https://www.facebook.com/events/771941642883383/

Venue: Burton Road Community Centre, Carlton, Nottingham, NG4 3GP

See: communitycentres@gedling.gov.uk & http://www.gedling.gov.uk/leisure/facilityvenuehire/communitycentres/burtonroad/

For those of you needing an accurate Satnav address, the venue is located almost directly opposite Rowell Letting & Estate Agents, 124 Burton Road, Carlton, Nottingham NG4 3GP (see: http://www.rowelluk.com/contact.php )


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html