Russian Meteor...

Yesterday morning, the world awoke to the announcement of a meteor blazing a trail across the skies of the Russian Urals region. According to the mainstream media, the object broke apart in the atmosphere releasing a huge amount of energy. The combined shockwave and sonic booms allegedly damaged buildings and shattered windows for miles in every direction. This event sat amongst a bevy of strange ‘coincidences’ and references to other events – events which are now viewed by numerous alternative researchers in a slightly different historical light.

As the story continued to be reported throughout the day, I began to feel that there something about all this that didn’t feel quite right. Not long after the event took, one mainstream news (MSN) channel referred to several eyewitness accounts of rockets/missiles having been fired at the meteor. The impact of these shattered the meteor in the atmosphere and prevented a larger impact with the ground. Nothing more of these accounts were subsequently reported by MSN.

I came across a few references to this scenario (including alleged eye witness mobile phone footage of these missile impacts), however nothing of significance materialised on the internet. Is it possible that this really occurred and accounts/footage has been removed from the net? Who knows for certain…

The MSN ‘talking heads’ compared the event to the infamous Tunguska scenario of 1908. Tunguska was referred to in these discussions as a meteor which exploded in the sky above the region and flattened hundreds of miles of forest.  Any keen eyed alternative researcher will know that there is more to ‘Tunguska’ than meets the eye.

Many of the eyewitnesses on that fateful day spoke of seeing “an oval-shaped mass moving across the sky, as well as seeing the object change course, and of having a very low speed.” The object was described by a traveller on the Trans-Siberian Railway as “moving erratically.” For many decades, following the event, respected academics mounted many expeditions to study the region and continued to fail to locate any remnants of a meteorite. Sergei Korolyov, the father of Soviet space science, became convinced that an alien spaceship had exploded over the region. Russian engineer E. Krutelev published his analysis Tunguska in the ‘Rabochaya Tribuna’ newspaper in 1991 and concluded that what occurred was actually the “take-off” of a craft. Many who have studied the Tunguska event conclude that the object was (if nothing else) of “artificial origin”.

More unusual are the claims that the explosion was a result of an experiment originating from the research of Nikola Tesla. On December 8th, 1915, The New York Times carried an article entitled “Tesla’s new device like bolts of Thor.” It is claimed that his designs could transmit large amounts of “wireless energy” and produce destructive effects at any point on the globe. It is widely believed that Tunguska was precisely the location where Tesla chose to test the invention.

Never the less, the MSN chose to ignore all the Tunguska research and describe the events as an exploding meteor.

But the strangeness doesn’t end there.

Yesterday also heralded the closest fly-by of asteroid 2012 DA14. “Experts” in astronomy and space science were paraded onto the TV screen and exclaimed that there was no danger of 2012 DA14 hitting the earth. The morning events in Russia were considered nothing more than a “Cosmic Coincidence” and had no relation to the 2012 DA14 fly-by. Coincidences do happen, of course!

Despite the reassurances that we were in no danger of catastrophic asteroid/meteor impacts, it was curious that almost all of these interviews contained speculative “what if” scenarios. These discussions included scenarios of flattened cities, extinction level events, etc. These news pieces appeared to carry all the hallmarks of social engineering tactics, including perceptual management, engineered consent and propagation of fear.

Such earth shattering scenarios have been alluded to in many of the damning documents that discuss psychological means to control the masses. The usurping of climate change, international terrorism, etc., is as much a part of these tactics as “the object from space” is. All branches of the media reinforce this. The news gives us the main “talking points”, the documentaries and current affairs programs flesh out the case in point, and the movies/TV shows either reinforce the dogma via predictive programming, or provide a “plausible deniability clause” should those in control wish to do a U-turn at a later date. The meteor / asteroid predictive programming has been managed to great effect in films like Armageddon and Deep Impact, with occasional “top-ups” – such as the recent Derren Brown “Apocalypse”.

It is also curious that, within the last week, an interview with the infamous “Bomber Harris” was released into the public domain. The timing of this was very peculiar and didn’t seem to make much sense. The root of the interview seemed to be a justification of state sponsored, mass civilian casualties during times of crisis or war. What is particularly interesting is the “strategy of terror” (ironic name!) inflicted by both sides during WW2. The overall architects of this strategy of fear were the psychologists and psychiatrists employed by the likes of The Tavistock Institute. Is there a connection between this and the confusion, muddle-up, and fear tactics employed yesterday?

If something amiss occurred, then we shouldn’t be in the least bit surprised. I recall how I felt on 9/11, when the pieces just didn’t seem to fit right. The footage of “planes” impacting The Twin Towers seemed “Hollywood”, almost “hyper-real”. The air of the “hyper-real” struck me again yesterday. Clear blues skies (just like 9/11) to accentuate the footage, clips tightly edited so as to avoid/muddy the clarity of the moment of impact/explosion (just like 9/11), talking heads almost immediately telling us exactly what has occurred (just like 9/11), a nice dollop of fear mongering to keep the masses wondering (just like 9/11), and, of course, the story seemed to overshadow everything else being reported.

Maybe I’m reading something into nothing here. It is unfortunate that this story with probably disappear from the public consciousness very quickly, making it almost impossible to investigate further. As with all these events, I believe it crucial that we keep a level headed, but open, mind.

I realise that I have not posted much here lately. Unfortunately, I continue to be plagued with a number of health problems which make it very painful for me to sit and type (or research for that matter), let alone stand up. The dates have been set for my treatment/surgery so I hope to get back on board with everything soon.

In the meantime, thank you for all your continued readership and support, and remember to take care of yourself and each other.

All the best!
Carl (The Truth Seeker’s Guide)

Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

Infinite Energy – But not for the Masses...

On Tuesday, I had the opportunity to go Truth Juice Birmingham and listen to Andrew Johnson’s presentation “Infinite Energy – But not for the Masses”. Andrew always tackles his subject matters with enthusiasm and attention to detail, but this was a particularly fascinating talk. Analysis of the evidence shows how numerous individuals have developed cheap, clean and incredibly efficient methods of creating energy. These methods (if utilised correctly) could eliminate our current “dependency” on fossil fuels and nuclear power. So why aren’t we seeing technology based on Radiant Energy, Cold Fusion, Magnetic Motors and “vacuum energy” (for example) in wide scale use?
 
In the presentation, Andrew looked at:
 
•What do we mean by "Infinite Energy"/ "Free Energy"?
•What some people have said about free energy devices
•Tesla Reproductions-Palsness
•Wilhelm Reich
•Cold Fusion -- Dr Eugene Mallove and Steve Jones
•John Hutchison's experiments and Batteries
•Water Powered Vehicles
•Bedini Motors
•Magnetic Motor Reproduction (Howard Johnson)
•Bruce De Palma and the N-Machine
•Death of Inventors
•Dr Steven Greer and his "Energy Projects"
•Why we have not got widespread use of Free Energy
•Weaponisation of the technology

It is difficult not to draw the conclusion that a cover up is taking place (and has been for a long time.) Why are we being held prisoner to archaic technology and fuel sources that cost us a fortune in fuel bills? The revelations are staggering (as are the inherent implications) and raise serious questions about the ultimate motives behind the cover up.

I have placed the link to the videos of this presentation below. The videos were recorded in 2010, but it is the same talk that I discussed above. The sound quality is a little uneven to begin with, but improves after the first ten minutes. I hope you will take the time to watch.
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=314&Itemid=55
All the best.
The Truth Seeker’s Guide


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

The War In Orbit - *UPDATE*

Forgot to include this video in my last blog, regarding the possible connection between the NASA/USAF/DARPA unmanned orbital space plane: The X37-B and some of the major earthquakes of 2011. It is from YouTube and directly relates to the subject. I have also included the link to the Youtube page.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_alOq958fk

Whilst I am not saying that I agree with every single aspect of the video (I sit on the fence with regard to John Lear...), I have included it here because it shows that more and more people are making the connections and starting to think outside the box... rather than always taking conventional explanations for granted. If nothing else, its worth a look!
All The Best.
The 'Guide

The War In Orbit: The X37-B & Earthquake Weapons

   In the last few months, much has been written and discussed regarding the newer range of US orbital spacecraft: known as the X-37 program. The history of this technology is eyebrow raising to say the least, but it is the possible implications that have set internet forums alight. The craft is essentially an unmanned space plane, launched atop an Atlas V rocket. Weighing in at 11,000 pounds and measuring approx. 9.5 feet high, 30 feet long and 15 feet wide, it is capable of deploying solar panels to provide electrical power in orbit and has a cargo bay for numerous mission payloads. The nature of these payloads has raised questions, given that any specific mission details have remained a closely guarded secret.

   Acknowledged publically (at least) is a mandate to “launch a surge of small satellites during periods of high international tension. This would enable America to have eyes and ears, orbiting above any potential trouble spot in the world” (Pentagon sources). There has been speculation that it is testing spy technology, or is the first step towards a space weapon which could take out rival countries' satellites or drop bombs from orbit. The oddest indication of a more sinister project came from Air Force deputy under-secretary for space systems Gary Payton: “We, the Air Force, have a suite of military missions in space and this new vehicle could potentially help us do those missions better…. If these technologies on the vehicle prove to be as good as we estimate, it will make our access to space more responsive, perhaps cheaper, and push us in the vector toward being able to react to war fighter needs more quickly.” Interesting use of the term “War Fighter”…

   Examining the history of the project does have the effect of switching on some overhead light bulbs. What ‘officially’ began in the late 1990s was originally a NASA project. NASA awarded Boeing a $301 million contract for two X-37 vehicles in 2002, with the vehicles constructed by Boeing Co.'s Phantom Works. Due to ‘alleged’ budgetary problems, the project ended up in the hands of the Pentagon's Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) in 2004. The USAF also got on board by 2006. All these institutions have been involved in numerous black ops projects over the years and have given researchers just cause to question whether the X-37 is another covert operation. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been spent on the X-37 program, but the current total has yet to be revealed. The budget for the X-37B, also called the Orbital Test Vehicle, is classified and the Air Force refuses to disclosed any of the craft's activities in space

   The project is always referred to in the same sentence as DARPA’s Falcon program or "Force Application and Launch from CONUS." This centres on a small "reusable Hypersonic Cruise Vehicle (HCV) capable of delivering 12,000 pounds of payload at a distance of 9,000 nautical miles from [the continental United States] in less than two hours." The budget for this program came at the same time as DARPA became involved with the X-37 program and was allocated by George Bush from a 2004/$459 billion bill that provided $100 million for a new "prompt global strike" program.  Global Strike could deliver a conventional, precision-guided warhead anywhere in the world within two hours, via a hypersonic platform.

   According to DARPA, the reusable vehicle could "provide the country with significant capability to conduct responsive missions with quick turn-around sortie rates while providing aircraft-like operability and mission-recall capability.” The vehicle would be launched into space on a rocket, fly on its own to a target, deliver its payload and return to Earth. With this in mind, one could argue that the X-37 & Falcon are under the same operational banner. One would therefore also assume that the X-37 is a military application.

   Within the Falcon mandate was the “X-41 Common Aero Vehicle (CAV), a common aerial platform for hypersonic ICBMs and cruise missiles, as well as civilian RLVs and ELVs. The prototype Hypersonic Technology Vehicle 2 (HTV-2) first flew on 22 April 2010; the second test flew 11 August 2011. Both flights ended prematurely.” (Wikipedia) There was also the controversial “fighter-sized unmanned aircraft called "Black swift" (also known as HTV-3X) which would take off from a runway and accelerate to Mach 6 before completing its mission and landing again.” DARPA & USAF signed off on the project in September 2007 and allegedly cancelled it within a year. “On 17 November 2011 there was a successful hypersonic glide test flight launched via rocket from Hawaii of the Advanced Hypersonic Weapon (AHW). The target was on Kwajalein atoll in the Marshall Islands. The AHW has a shorter range than the HTV-2 and is also part of the Prompt Global Strike program.” Many of the Falcon’s attached projects involved the likes of Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, Boeing, and ATK: something worth noting when you thoroughly research the darker corners of developmental or classified technology…

   You might say, “This is all well and good, thanks for the tech spec history lesson, but what does this have to do with Earthquakes?”

   Following the success of the first 270-day mission in 2010, the second launch (the X-37B - in March 2011) has been studied closely by numerous amateur and expert Sky Watchers. With the X-37B in Earth orbit for the large duration of this year, watchers have been able to track its trajectory, plot its orbits and post their findings at the SeeSat-L website (satobs.org) and others. Greg Roberts of their group found the USAF's X-37B OTV 2-1 space plane which became identified as Catalogue Number 36514, 2010-015A, OTV-1. "If memory is correct, we have found and are tracking every single object launched in the past five years or more. The only objects we are not able to track are those stationed over areas of the earth where we have no active observers… mainly the central Pacific Ocean area."

   A number of researchers took these flight paths and attempted to match up times and locations with some of the Earthquakes of 2011. Eerily, many synchronise within a few hours or miles of each other. Is this just a coincidence? Speculation about EQ weapons has been around for a while now and despite claims from political leaders, scientists, geologists, etc., the ‘mainstream’ view is that of science fiction speculation. Such attitudes could be valid, if it were not for the ever growing research into exotic weaponisation, DEWs (Directed Energy Weapons), KEWs (Kinetic Energy Weapons), etc.

   The Pentagon’s allocation of military budgets becomes more bizarre with every passing year. Both the US Senate and the United Nations have discussed the weaponisation of Earth orbit on numerous occasions. Such discussions have rarely been confined to solely “conventional weapons”. The US military has long sought such measures.

   The 1995/1996 US Air Force research document: Air Force 2025 discusses The Global Area Strike System (GLASS) which consists of a high energy laser (HEL) system, a kinetic energy weapon (KEW) system, and a trans-atmospheric vehicle (TAV). The HEL system consists of ground-based lasers and space-based mirrors which direct energy to the intended target. The KEW system consists of terminally guided projectiles with and without explosive enhancers. The TAV is a flexible platform capable of supporting maintenance and replenishment of the HEL and KEW space assets, and could also be used for rapid deployment of special operations forces. Target definition and sequencing is managed externally using GIMS. The document also discusses space elevators, weather modification (HAARP and Chemtrails), various DEWs, Hypersonic Attack Platforms and much more. Here is the link: http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/index.htm

   Some websites have also mused about KEWs, in relation to the X-37B. “A kinetic bombardment is the act of attacking a planetary surface with an inert projectile, where the destructive force comes from the kinetic energy of the projectile impacting at very high velocities.” (Wikipedia) “Rods From God” & Project Thor (Jerry Pournelle originated the idea for a weapons system that launches kinetic projectiles from Earth orbit to damage targets on the ground,  while working in operations research at Boeing in the 1950s) are discussed at length. Sadly, many of these possibilities are dismissed into the realms of Science Fiction…

   As a postscript, it is worth noting that the TR-3B (USAF Flying Triangle) had a similar route through the hands of the agencies that have steered the X-37B program. The TR-3B has been quantifiably connected to gravity warping systems, Phantom Stealth technology, noise cancellation technology and a host of Top Secret hardware. The craft has been down played as non-existent or extra-terrestrial in origin, however there are a huge number of engineers and scientists who beg to differ. How is it that we can accept this a little more readily than the possibility of an unmanned shuttle creating Earthquakes? I suspect it may be in the same way that people can believe in ghosts (as an example), but not a cover-up surrounding the events of 9/11 (No offense to believers in ghosts!)...

Maybe this connection between the X37-B and EQs is too intangible.
Maybe it lacks the publically fired imagination of other matters.
Maybe there just isn’t enough proof.
Maybe it’s all just a coincidence.
It’s up to you to decide.

Till Next Time!
The Truth Seeker’s Guide