An interesting set of developments occurred in the last few days that grabbed my curiosity. I was minutes from heading out the door, when I caught a MSN bulletin (a rare thing I might add) suggesting that the UK government ‘may’ have got it’s tactics wrong with regard to medicating the population in anticipation of 2009’s false flag, “Swine Flu Pandemic”. The announcer also stated that, in doing so, the government had subjected groups of individuals to “potential health risks”. I remember shouting at the TV: “I could have told them that obvious fact 3 years ago!” Trying to keep an eye on the various mainstream outlets for the next few days was also interesting, given that there was little further coverage on the matter. Despite this, I did manage to find a few articles drifting around the net shedding some light.
It seems that the story revolves around the so called ‘wonder drug’ Tamiflu which was used to prevent and treat influenza in the past and mass distributed to hundreds of thousands of people (if not more) in the UK during the scaremongering period of 2009. Tamiflu was discovered in 1999 by the Californian biotech company, Gilead Sciences and is currently manufactured by Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche.
Roche’s studies on Tamiflu suggested that it reduced the number of patients who needed to be hospitalised after becoming infected with swine flu. These findings have been recently called into question by Sir Iain Chambers (founder of The Cochrane Collaboration, “a non-profit group who analyse medical evidence through results from the world's best medical research studies”). He says, “We have invested millions of pounds on stockpiling Tamiflu on the basis of a paper that presented the results of 12 trials, only two of which have been published… the investigation shows Roche refused to provide data to evaluate these trials.”
Both Gilead Sciences and Roche have a colourful history regarding pharmaceutical development that deserves a thorough examination (no pun intended!). As for the health risks, the reported side effects have included nausea, nightmares (in children), and narcolepsy… although many others have been cited.
The truth about Tamiflu goes much deeper than these adverse reactions though and it seems that here is where the MSM will not dare to tread… for to discuss it would invoke a public scandal. The subsequent Swine Flu vaccination (and many other vaccinations) proved an even greater risk to the public. The treatment contained the deadly adjuvant Squalene (which wreaks havoc with the human immune system and was listed in the EU as a bio-
weapon), the vaccine had been sitting on the shelf for an eternity and was shipped out with virtually no trials on humans, it created huge profits for Big Pharma, it had already been shown to potentially trigger auto-immune diseases and famously highlighted government ineptitude during the 1976 Swine Flu outbreak when the vaccination killed hundreds and left others with the crippling Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Most disturbing of all were the attempts by several western governments (in tandem with the fear tactics of the mainstream media) to create a mandatory vaccination programme. Although this never extended as widely as they hoped (due in thanks to a surprisingly large number of well-informed individuals and a lacklustre uptake), the UK Government’s own documents show that large scale, mandatory treatment was well into the advance planning stages.
The callous nature of the TPTB continues unabated even now. There were many unreported deaths, not from Swine Flu, but rather as a reaction to the treatment. These statistics were bundled in with ‘official’ number of Swine ‘FLU’ fatalities. During the 2011/2012 winter period, numerous seasonal flu deaths were reclassified as Swine Flu deaths. Why?!! Examples of government thinking can be witnessed in the documents “Draft Strategic National Vaccine Plan” (11/26/08) & The House Of Commons Swine flu vaccination - Standard Note: SN/SC/5164 - Author: Dr Gavin Colthart. The UK NHS Swine Flu Survival Guide pamphlet also makes for interesting reading (between the lines, of course!)
There is a much more important issue here though. The media, huge corporations, medical institutions, the government… all colluding to try to get all of us to expose our health to potentially life threatening risks. What the hell are they playing at?! You only have to due any peripheral research into a company like Monsanto to know that it ain't good anyway! The rhetoric, after the Swine Flu ‘Pandemic’ amounted to nothing was “prevention and luck saved the day”. Quite frankly this is a cover story on the scale of a steaming great pile of horse manure! It's possible that this recent touch of truth regarding Swine Flu will open the gate to larger exposure, but I doubt it. Disclosure would raise far to many uncomfortable questions.
As for you, I can only make a suggestion: If they ever tell you vaccinations are good for you and that you need to have one, I suggest you run for the door as fast as you can. This might sound like scare tactics from the flipside of the coin but don't take it from me... Do your own homework, get informed and make up your own mind. You’ll be glad you did.
Namaste Folks!
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
Further reading:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-birmingham-16607097
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.com/2011/07/un-natural-war-part-four-vaccinations_23.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2087760/Tamiflu-Side-effects-effectiveness-wonder-drug-microscope.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
History shows us that part of the legacy of 9/11 was the “War On Terror”. Although this war began in Afghanistan, it was obvious that it was never going to be confined to this country alone. The eventual scope of this endeavour appeared disproportionate with the implications of the ‘official’ account of 9/11. Documented accounts show that the Bush administration (with the support of several other western powers) had considered both extensive military incursions in Syria and Pakistan, whilst an invasion of Iran was discussed on a weekly basis. With this, the public began to hear the alarm bells and questioned the true nature of these events. What was the real agenda behind the “War On Terror”? Tens years after 9/11, it is hindsight and information leaks and disclosures that have shown why questioning the real agenda was justified. The next stage of the “War On Terror” began “officially” in 2003 with the invasion of Iraq. However, like Afghanistan, evidence shows that this target was on the cards long before 9/11.
It has always seemed strange that the turn of the millennium showed such obvious aggressive intentions toward Iraq. Strange given the historical context of Iraq’s (and by association, Saddam Hussein) relationship with the US. There is a tangible history of business deals between the two countries and more importantly, an arms deal. The US armed Iraq to the teeth many times throughout the latter part of the twentieth century (see: Iran / Iraq War) and the extent of this arming was fully realised when US troops discovered that most of the small arms, ammunition, rockets and many vehicles (seized from fighters, post invasion), were US-made.
Many have theorised about “what went wrong”, in order to change the nature of this relationship. Some have speculated about Saddam’s plans to sell oil via a system other than the petro-dollar, some have talked about Global Agenda plans and others have simply pointed to financial reasons. It is difficult to truly know. As with Afghanistan, the usual suspects of business and military contractors profited hugely from the Iraq War and on a much larger scale than Afghanistan. Recently, it has been revealed that billions of dollars were wasted on black hole projects that certainly never benefited the people of Iraq, improved the infrastructure or helped to rebuild the country. This is simply nothing more than a crime of greed and corruption, but I’m digressing here…
Although it was perhaps the first Gulf War that set the precedent for Iraq always being an eventual target of the “War On Terror”, it seems that the first credible evidence appeared in late January of 2001... A full 7 months before 9/11 and 2 years before the actual invasion. This evidence relates to a Treasury Department memo received by former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill on January 24 2001 which contained a summary of a "military plan" for a "post-Saddam Iraq" which was marked “secret“. O’Neill later admitted that, within days of George Bush entering the White House, the Bush administration had drawn up plans to use U.S. troops to invade Iraq. Even former White House anti-terrorism advisor Richard Clarke later revealed, "They were talking about Iraq on 9/11. They were talking about it on 9/12. Rumsfeld was saying we needed to bomb Iraq". He also said that Rumsfeld said, “There aren't any good targets in Afghanistan and there are lots of good targets in Iraq".
The pretence could be seen on September 10 2001, when Rumsfeld warned of Iraq’s pursuit of WMDs. In 2002, CNN reported that mid afternoon of 9/11, Rumsfeld began planning strike plans against Saddam Hussein in Iraq. On September 12, Rumsfeld insisted (at a Cabinet meeting) that Iraq “should be a principal target of the first round of terrorism". In October of 2001, former CIA Director James Woolsey said Iraq was likely involved in 9/11 and the ‘alleged’ anthrax attacks of the time, and that “the US will probably confront Saddam Hussein as part of its war on terrorism“.
From this period onwards, Iraq was inextricably connected to 9/11, despite there being no evidence to prove it. The West began to build a case for the invasion of Iraq. In February 2002, US military intelligence warned the Bush administration that a captured Al Qaeda operative had given fabricated information that Iraq was training Al Qaeda members in how to make chemical and biological weapons. Despite this information being totally unreliable and despite being warned by intelligence agencies that the information “may be faulty”, President Bush used this information in a (October 2002) speech to try to link Iraq to 9/11. On February 5, 2003, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell addressed the UN Security Council about alleged WMDs in Iraq and alleged connections with Al Qaeda.
Despite the continued search for, and lack of, credible evidence to connect Iraq, the West appeared unfettered and unconcerned. The rhetoric was that it was always ‘inevitable’. The true arrogance of the ‘Agenda’ players was witnessed in January 2003 in a war memo showing that George Bush was determined to go to war with Iraq, regardless of whether or not they had the backing of the UN. The memo also quoted him as “discussing ways they could provoke Saddam Hussein into a confrontation“. By March 2003, Iraq had been invaded.
The most damning proof of a cover up began to unfold in George Bush’s State Of The Union address on January 28, 2003. It was here that Bush uttered those now infamous 16 words: "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa". This intelligence became mired in controversy when columnist Robert Novak exposed CIA operative Valerie Plame, the wife of retired diplomat Joseph C. Wilson. This is key because Wilson was sent to Niger, Africa in February 2002 to investigate the possible purchase of Uranium Yellowcake by Iraq. His conclusion that this was “highly unlikely” was considered by the CIA to be “less than definitive”. With the onset of the ‘British Intelligence Reports’ and Bush’s statement of evidence in his address, many in US and British politics began to accuse the Bush administration of ignoring prior intelligence and eventually added to the notion that the President “lied the country to war”.
The involvement of the British Government and Intelligence Agencies, at this point, is key to understanding why Iraq became known as an “illegal war”. As early as October 4, 2001, the U.K. Government released a 70 point dossier as evidence against Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaeda networks and their alleged involvement in 9/11. Both experts and media reports stated that their case against Osama was "thin on facts," "full of conjecture," and "still no smoking gun". It seems bizarre that when the Iraq scenario came around, the British Government continued, in part, to refer to this document. This is despite there being no real relationship between this 70 point dossier and the ‘Iraq Case’.
Throughout 2002, Tony Blair’s government began to work on building a case against Iraq as part of their commitment to a U.S.-led Iraq invasion. By early 2003, The UK released a document entitled “Iraq: Its Infrastructure of Concealment, Deception and Intimidation “, now known as “The Dodgy Dossier”.
Unbeknownst to anyone at the time, they had inadvertently opened Pandora’s Box…
To Be Continued…
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
Imagine that you flipped a coin several hundred times in succession and it came up heads every single time. Or maybe you got tails a handful of times, but the vast majority was heads… Aside from being a pretty lucky person, would it be an occurrence that you could consign to the realm of pure coincidence? The odds of it happening are not statistically impossible, but it would a rare, possibly freak, occurrence. 9/11 is a lot like that particular coin analogy. There are little pieces of fact pertaining to that day that cannot be categorised into any evidential category. The only box in which they belong is “coincidence”. But what if, like the coin, it is followed by another odd coincidence… and another… and another… When do you stop viewing this huge number of oddities as merely coincidences and ask if they are signs of something more?
Here, I am going to assemble some of the more interesting oddities surrounding 9/11. It is by no means a wholly inclusive list (as listing them all here would take forever and there are new ones being discovered every day!), it is simply an example of the more ‘strange’ aspects of 9/11. These aspects have been analysed endlessly by the Truth community, for their significance. Is it a huge number of mere coincidences or a collective portent of prior knowledge or foresight? You decide…
Aside from numerous examples, including: FEMA's "Emergency Response to Terrorism" booklet (1997) and the U.S. Department of Justice/National Sheriffs’ Association's participant manual “Managing Weapons of Mass Destruction Incidents: An Executive Level Program for Sheriffs” (funded by the Department Of Homeland Security and produced in June 2000), which both show the WTC targeted by a gun scope’s cross-hairs, it is possible that those in positions of power may have had other, more unconventional, premonitions.
On the morning of September 11, 1941, a groundbreaking ceremony took place to officially begin construction of The Pentagon. The attack on The Pentagon took place 60 years to the day (almost to the hour) of the groundbreaking ceremony! On September 5 (six days before 9/11), Donald Rumsfeld asked the Senate to approve the D.O.D. 's 2002 budget request. It was to be the largest defence spending increase since the latter days of the Cold War. There he talked about the importance of U.S. homeland defence, warned about the threats of terrorism and missile attacks, and later reported that he was confident that his budget request would pass. Rumsfeld also had a list of “Rules” that he had distilled from 50 years of service. On January 30, 2001 (5 days after taking his office), he posted these rules on the D.O.D. official website. The rules were removed in October 2002. These rules were only ever modified once… on September 10, 2001. Twenty four hours before 9/11, Rumsfeld added one single new rule: “America ain’t what’s wrong with the world”. Let us also not forget, that on this exact same day, Rumsfeld announced that the Pentagon had lost track of $2.3 TRILLION DOLLARS of military spending.
Four days before 9/11, George Bush’s brother Jeb Bush signed a two year executive order (01-261) placing Florida under a state of emergency. With the Bush family under the spotlight, it is also interesting to point out that Marvin Bush joined Securacom's board of directors, a security firm who has previously done security studies for WTC, Dulles and United. The company eventually became Stratesec and provided security at the World Trade Centre from 1995 to 2001 (right up to the towers collapsed).
The day before 9/11, Bush senior (Ex CIA director, former President, and President Bush's Dad) was in Washington D.C. at a Carlyle Group business conference (The Carlyle Group is inextricably linked to 9/11, just google the name!) and continued such meetings on the morning of 9/11. Present at all these meetings was Carlyle investor and Bush family friend: Shafig Bin Laden, brother of Osama Bin Laden.
It is also well documented that the Bin Laden Family websites, emails, links and domain names were due to expire on Sept 11 2001.
On the subject of websites and technology, the U.S. government deployed an anti-terrorism taskforce on September 5, 2001, to pull the plug on over 500 websites (many with Arab and Muslim connections). Some people have even placed significance on the Microsoft Wingding fonts of the period. It became something of a net phenomenon when it was discovered that words and names related to 9/11, typed out using Wing Ding and Web Ding fonts, showed a ‘possible code’. The rumours were later debunked, however some key 9/11 words still show oddities in the font, for example: NYC, NEW YORK and OSAMA BIN LADEN. Some have continued to highlight the significance, given the connections between Microsoft and the ‘Agenda’ corporatocracy.
On the subject of such business connections, it is also strange that at least half a dozen of the passengers on the ‘alleged’ planes used on 9/11, were employed by Ratheon: a company with intricate links to the US Air Force and Boeing, AND responsible for numerous technological advances in aviation including GPS guidance and systems that allowed for precision approach and landing of pilot-less aircraft.
Whilst discussing aviation, it also appears that the airline companies who owned the ‘alleged’ planes of 9/11, appeared to engage in future trading that would have been directly affected by the events of the day. From the 6th to the 10th of September 2001, a huge number of ‘put’ options were placed on United Airlines, Boeing and American Airlines stock, betting that the price would fall sharply. The trades are called "puts" because they involve at least 450,000 shares of American. What raised the flag of suspicion, was the (more than) 80 percent of orders being "puts", far outnumbering "call" options, those betting the stock would rise. After 9/11 it was claimed that the financial arm of “terrorist organisations” had financed the ‘puts’ because they were the only ones who could have known in advance! Many people subsequently pushed for an investigation into insider trading. After several investigations and court cases, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) stated that they “found no evidence that anyone who had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks traded on the basis of that information”. It always seemed inevitable that this (like many other inquiries, commissions and investigations in history) would be a foregone conclusion. Thankfully, the knowledge gleaned from such matters is also a foregone conclusion: it is damning merely in it’s existence.
In July, two months before 9/11, a 40 year old FAA rule allowing commercial airline pilots to be armed was rescinded. Also note that the hijacking weapon of choice: box cutters, weren't allowed pre-9/11 by the airlines industry. Strange also that the ONLY person to have witnessed the use of box-cutters (upon which the ENTIRE ‘official’ account bases this particular evidence), was right wing commentator and author Barbara Olson. Not only did she have a super-duper cell phone that allowed perfect contact (twice) from the plane to the ground (allowing for an account of events), but she was also the wife of U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson . A man who admitted in public that the U.S. government lies and a man who helped stopped the Florida recount that helped Bush win the 2000 election. So a reliable testimony there then…
On the subject of the ‘hijackers’, we have the crucial evidence that ‘proved’ the culpability of those involved. Atta's luggage, which contained incriminating evidence, was the only luggage of the 81 passengers aboard Flight 11 that didn't make it on the plane. Convenient… Despite the buildings collapse through structural damage caused by the intense heat and explosion of the jet and it’s fuel, etc, etc, etc, the passport of alleged Flight 11 hijacker, Satam Al-Suqami, is reportedly found in the rubble still soaked in jet fuel by an unidentified man in his 30's only "minutes" after the plane allegedly crashed into the North WTC Tower. The passport is in remarkably good condition given the circumstance. Let’s also not forget there are indications that some of the ‘hijackers’ were still alive after 9/11. How did they manage that, if they were involved?!!
In part 2, I will look at what some have cited as bizarre or uncanny “predictions” of 9/11.
To Be Concluded…
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
Just after 10 am on 9/11, United Flight 93 (travelling 580 mph) was reported as flipping over and crashing straight down in a empty field in the rural town of Shanksville, PA, burrowing itself underground. The passengers reportedly tried to take over the plane from the alleged hijackers. “The fuselage burrowed straight into the earth so forcefully that one of the "black boxes" was recovered at a depth of 25 feet under the ground." (Washington Post - 05/12/02). "But although the government was authorized to shoot down the errant planes, Deputy Defence Secretary Paul Wolfowitz told the NewsHour he believes that crash came instead as a result of a passenger uprising… we were already tracking in on that plane that crashed in Pennsylvania. I think it was the heroism of the passengers on board that brought it down, but the Air Force was in a position to do so if we had had to." (PBS - 9/16/01)
This remark: “The Air Force was in a position to do so”, is the central notion of the real investigation into the ‘crash’ of United Flight 93. In the minutes leading to this event, UK ITV news showed live footage of an F-16 fighter jet in the area; thus proving that the military did indeed have the means to shoot down a passenger jet. Kevin Dunn (ITV foreign correspondent) was interviewed by news reader Kirsty Young. She asked, “Would it be possible for an American Military plane such as this, to have any impact on the destination or, indeed, the course of a plane?” and he replied, “Well the warplane could obviously challenge by radio, whoever is in control of an aircraft and ultimately threaten and indeed shoot them down.”
The lack of bodies and debris has been pointed to, in the truth community, as the absence of Flight 93. I actually believe that was a plane smashed across the landscape of Shanksville and the surrounding area. Whether it was Flight 93 or not is a pertinent question. How it was ’downed’ is probably the more important question to ask though. Many have pointed to sink holes and mine shafts as the resting place for much of the larger debris (the area of land had been previously strip-mined for coal) and a nearby lake for much of the rest. Whilst I can’t argue with this, I also know there is a huge number of accounts of a military craft pursuing and even shooting down the ‘high jacked’ plane. If this scenario were true, it would almost certainly account for the debris pattern and lack thereof.
Much of what follows here has been debated and questioned for validity. Whilst it is difficult to positively confirm the 100 percent accuracy of the following claims, they do raise questions. I would like to present them, merely, as a possibility…
At 9:58, a Flight 93 passenger allegedly made a cell phone call and said that he saw an explosion and smoke and that the plane was "going down."
The Tactical Air Communications Unit at the National Security Operations Centre (NSOC) at NSA was broadcasting live the cockpit communications between two U.S. Air Force F-16s over Somerset County, Pennsylvania. One F-16 pilot said "we are now engaging the target."
the NSA CRITICOM messaging system contained a flash message called a "CRITIC" that stated a commercial aircraft was "intercepted" over Pennsylvania. The latitude and longitude of the interception was provided along with the time of the interception. There were many ‘live’ training exercises on 9/11. Could it be that one of these exercises was mistaken for this occurrence?
It is alleged that an encrypted special communications network that linked Air Force Chief of Staff General John Jumper to the Vice President and National Security Council, and a few other intelligence officials contained a message on the morning of September 11 that confirmed the U.S. Air Force shot down United flight 93. The message stated that a U.S. Air Force fighter jet shot the engine on flight 93 with a heat-seeking missile "over Pennsylvania".
A 911 emergency call to the Somerset Hospital Critical Care unit stated that the hospital should prepare for mass casualties since "two planes collided over Pennsylvania."
Several first response workers at the ‘official’ Stony Creek crash site described a crater that closely matched a Global Hawk unmanned drone, a story corroborated by an eyewitness at a nearby junk yard who witnessed a similar vehicle “colliding” with ‘Flight 93’. Another witness observed a small white aircraft pass over Ginger Hill Road and clear some trees before exploding in a small mushroom cloud on the other side of the tree line. The fallout from the explosion was described by the witness as "glittery".
At the Huckleberry Highway residential debris field, witnesses described the debris as little more than paper. More oddly being insurance papers, bank statements, and stock and bond certificates. The New Baltimore debris field (10 miles away) also reportedly consisted of singed bonds and insurance and bank papers.
One of the few impact witnesses described it as "not a plane" with no engine, pure white, tubular, with no markings or windows, soundless, and with the appearance of a moulded piece of plastic. The aircraft banked to the right before ascending over a tree line before crashing. Under the aircraft and mid-belly could be seen what the witness described as a "fin and spoiler". After the crash, the witness noticed two fighter jets in the area that circled and departed rapidly from the scene.
A phone call to a witness from a relative in Lancaster, Pennsylvania said that a friend in the Air Force said that the service had "shot down a plane in Pennsylvania."
Several farmers who were working in their fields that morning saw U.S. Air Force fighter planes shoot down United 93 and were (allegedly) subsequently threatened by FBI agents. One witness had a security gag order placed on him by the FBI. Eventually, a number of farmer witnesses changed their stories to coincide with the official story.
There are allegations that several local witnesses were harassed and intimidated in a threatening manner, by non-local law enforcement and FBI agents. One was claimed to have said to the eyewitness, “Do not lose faith in your government. We are handling it".
John, Tessa and Brian (three students who were at Shanksville High School at the time), witnessed a “big fighter plane” fly over the school “like 10 seconds” after the ‘crash’. Brian and John both believe that the jet shot down ‘Flight 93’.
Shanksville, PA, is a military flight corridor.
Mayor Ernie Stull, on arriving at the crash site, said he saw no evidence of a plane crash.
The "Flight 93" crash site remained fenced in and restricted, to the public.
In August 2003, Fox news reported that US investigators now believe that the ‘high-jackers’ crashed the plane BECAUSE of the passengers starting to revolt.
Norman Mineta (see: Pentagon) said he wasn't aware of Flight 93 until after it crashed and thought “it was shot down“.
On Dec 24, 2004, Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld gives a speech about 9/11 using the phrase: “shot down the plane over Pennsylvania” .
On September 11, 2001, President George W. Bush was overheard stating: "We shot a plane down over Pennsylvania".
So there we have it.
Never let yourself be TOLD what happened…9/11 is for YOU to decide.
I will be doing one more evidence based overview post (covering some as yet undiscussed aspects) to begin September and will then begin my 9/11 Legacy Blog Series.
Till Next Time!
The Truth Seekers Guide.
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
There are numerous perspectives on the methods, culprits and motivations that resulted in 9/11 being labelled as a cover-up or inside job. Certain groups of people have said that there is a cover-up, but this cover-up simply encapsulates a peripheral view of only certain aspects of evidence. This view proposes three questions: Did the US government know of an imminent attack? Could they have prevented it? Or worse, did they allow it to happen?
Threats of terrorisms and plane hijackings, especially in the latter half of the twentieth century, are a matter of historical record. There are numerous accounts of individuals and groups planting bombs and seizing commercial airlines. Also, the notion of such acts have been a mainstay of popular literature, film and television for a long time. With this fact being so prevalent in the common political and cultural zeitgeist, it would be hard for any government (especially a global power) not to take such threats seriously.
It appears, as early as September 1972, that such threats were. Richard Nixon formed a high-level, government panel at the time to develop methods to protect the US against the possibility of terrorist attacks (in various forms). Bureaucracy, Elections and Watergate eventually diluted the findings and purpose of the panel. Even as late as June 1995, President Clinton signed the PDD-39 Counterterrorism Directive in an attempt to increase the effectiveness of terrorism investigations, by placing the FBI in charge.
It is questionable how effective such measures and warnings were, but it does show that such notions were taken seriously at the time. It does seem obvious from both records and events (pre- 9/11) that the US government was aware of the seriousness. Boeing 707, continental airline flight 11, was destroyed, mid flight, by a bomb in 1962. Four US bound airlines were high jacked over Europe in 1970 (3 of which were later blown up on an airstrip in Jordan). Private Robert Preston stole an army helicopter and flew it to the White House in February of 1974. Five days later, Samuel Byck attempted to highjack a commercial plane…with the intention of crashing into the White House and killing Nixon. The list goes on and on.
Indeed, US officials had considered the possibility of planes being flown into the Olympic Stadium in Atlanta in 1996. In 1997, John O’Neill (the man who was killed on his second day of work as chief of security at the World Trade Centre on 9/11) warned, in his role as assistant director of the FBI, that imminent and organized terrorist attacks were possible and that terrorists were already operating in the US.
More evidently, we have the foiled 1995 terrorist plot: ‘Operation Bojinka’, which alerted the US to plans that included hijacking planes to attack the Pentagon, WTC and CIA headquarters. There are also actual events like the bombing of the USS Cole in October 2000. An event that was, ironically, associated with Osama Bin Laden.
In August 2001, it was claimed that the US were warned by both French Intelligence authorities and The Taliban of an imminent terrorist attack against the US.
On August 6th, the CIA drafted a memo entitled “Bin Laden Determined To Strike in US”. This document was reported by at least a dozen or so mainstream newspapers and TV news outlets, after 9/11.
On September 7th 2001, the US State Department warned US citizens may be targeted by Al Qaeda associated terrorists
With all of this in mind, it is utterly staggering that in May 2002, Condoleezza Rice gave a press briefing where she stated:
“I don't think anybody could have predicted that these people would take an airplane and slam it into the World Trade Centre, take another one and slam it into the Pentagon; that they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile."
This is compounded by her claims that (pre 9/11) intelligence reports “did not contain specific warning information, but only a generalized warning“, and did not contain information that Bin Laden and his associates were discussing a “particular planned attack against a specific target at any specific time, place, or by any specific method.“.
In retrospect, specific documents and testimony combined with historical precedence almost overwhelmingly show that the powers that be, were at least aware of the possibility of a 9/11-style terrorist event.
The 9/11 Commission Report was published in July 2004. Despite the CIA rebuking the final report, claiming that they regularly reported on “threats to civil aviation” and citing Osama Bin Laden as “a danger”; the 9/11 report exonerated both the Clinton and Bush administrations and their intelligence agencies of any blame.
It is interesting to note that that in December of 2003, Chairman Kean of the independent 9/11 commission pointed fingers inside the administration and ultimately insinuated that the 9/11 attacks could have been prevented. This brings us onto the second question: Did the US government, military, intelligence agencies have the capability to prevent the attacks? You only have to research the slew of operations that were planned and carried out in the year, months, weeks and days leading up to 9/11 (and on the day itself) to see that the capability of prevention was available.
In October of 2000, The Pentagon conducted the first of two emergency exercises (MASCAL) involving mock crashes of passenger aircraft into the Pentagon. NORAD planned a similar practice scenario in April 2001, which they ultimately rejected as being “too unrealistic”! Oddly, in the same month, Fort Meyer conducted a Force Protection Exercise which included aspects of NORAD’s “unrealistic” scenario. In June 2001, NORAD admitted that it had scrambled jets or diverted combat air patrols 67 times since September 2000, proving that such military capability of interception/prevention was possible. Further exercises were carried out.
- NORAD’s “Amalgam Virgo 01” (June 1st 2001),
- “Mall Strike 2001” (June 16th 2001)
- “Operation Dark Winter” (June 22nd / 23rd 2001 - which included scripted TV news naming Iraqi/Afghanistani terrorist groups as possible culprits),
- Another MASCAL exercise (June 29th 2001)
- Mock terrorism drill at Buffalo Niagara International Airport (September 8th 2001),
- NORAD’s operation “Northern Vigilance” (September 9th 2001)
- “Vigilant Guardian” (September 10th 2001 - a one-week exercise)
- Fort Belvoir’s “Garrison Control Exercise” (9/11)
- Fort Meyer’s “airport emergency operations” training exercise (9/11)
- NORAD’s simulated aircraft high-jacking exercise (9/11 - Source: Vanity Fair - 08/01/06).
There other exercises planned for 9/11 (& post 9/11) that were reported “cancelled”, including:
- Joint CIA/NRO exercise involving simulated plane crashes into buildings (Source: USA Today - 08/22/02), another force protection exercise for Fort Myer Military Community (Source: DC Military - 09/14/01)
- FEMA’s “Operation TRIPOD” (Sept 12th 2001), which, coincidentally, had it’s command centre located at Pier 92 where the 9/11 command centre was ultimately located.
This leads us to the last question of culpability. There are some who say that a total ineptitude on the part of dozens of state departments, lead to the attacks being “unavoidable”. Even the evidence above makes that theory doubtful (not unless hundreds of thousands of civil servants, intelligence officers and military personnel had the skill level of the Key Stone Cops!) Others say that the left hand didn’t know what the right hand was doing, for example: real events were being mistaken for training exercises. Looking at 9/11 through this narrow perspective of US responsibility without considering huge amounts of other evidence is a bit like exonerating a criminal just because they have nice smile!
It does beg the questions: If they had prior knowledge, if they could have prevented it and didn’t… Did they allow it to happen?
You would have to ignore a lot of other aspects to make this argument work.
This leads us to the ultimate question: Were they complicit or even, directly responsible?
To Be Continued…
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
The Un-Natural War and the concept of “Nature Modification” is not just about the functioning of our environment around us; it is equally as much about us. We are being modified in a very subtle and gross way. If uninformed, it can be very easy for people to allow an agenda of biological warfare, that affects each and everyone of us, to pass unnoticed.
The history of military, intelligence agency, industry & pharmaceutical company projects & operations, designed to test biological agents and incapacitate or kill population groups is very well documented. There are examples throughout history such as: the case, in 1940, of 400 Chicago prisoners, unknowingly infected with Malaria to test methods of treatment, the LSD experiments of the 50s & 60s, the Pine Bluff / Dugway Proving Ground testing of BZ Psychotropic Gas, the Anthrax test at Gruinard Island in Scotland in 1942, the release of Bacillus Subtilis into the New York Subway system in July ‘67 and the AIDS infected, Hepatitis B vaccine administered to homosexuals and ethnic minorities in the US from 1976 onward. These are just a few examples but there are many, many more.
Whilst these endeavours cannot be dismissed, they are “contained” experiments that were designed (initially) to be contained in a specific area or limited number of people. Most people would read about these events and eventually sigh of relief that it didn’t, or hasn’t, affected them. They would be disgusted but they’d eventually close the book and get on with their life, safe in the knowledge that they are relatively healthy and not in the least bit “experimented on”….
You would think that wouldn’t you?…
Well…Let me tell you a story.
Once upon a time, many years ago; there were lots of little factories that made things like Fertiliser and Steel produce. Realising that their deeds created a toxic by-product, they decided they needed a way to get rid of it. Eventually, they had a “light bulb” moment and decided that they should channel these leftovers into the nearby bodies of water (rivers, lakes, reservoirs, etc). This way they would be able to say goodbye to it cheaply and all the little fishes and local wildlife could share in it’s toxic-goodness! Unbeknownst to the people in the nearby towns (but maybe “knownst” to the factory owners), it would not be long before they too would be able to share in it’s goodness as well.
This became a bit of a problem. This by-product turned out to be not so full of goodness! With no where else for it to go, Industry turned to the government to find a solution. Thus was born the concept of “Water Fluoridation”. With a lot of bad science and industrial chicanery to back it up, it was conveniently decided that people needed to take better care of their teeth: Fluoride was the answer. Not everybody could afford dental care, so it was decided that Fluoride in the population’s drinking water supply could help to reduce tooth decay and gum disease. It was convenient that this Fluoride happened to be the same by-product that Industry was dumping in the water.
Finally, the deception of Water Fluoridation is becoming common knowledge nowadays. Whilst the above tale appears to be first mass fluoridation exercise, it appears that small scale practice of intentional water “chemicalisation” occurred as early as 1917. Thanks to the Halloween events in Denora, Pennsylvania, the whistle-blowing of people like Dr Edward Groth, research like: “The Effects of the Subjugation of Dogs to the Inhalation and Ingestion of Calcium Fluoride” (April 13th, 1962) and the scientific studies of G.L. Waldbott (M.D.), Dr William Marcus (EPA Senior Toxicologist), Phyllis Mullenix (Forsyth Dental Institute), Dr Takeki Tsutsui (Nippon Dental College), to name a few; we are finally learning the true legacy of Water Fluoridation.
Studies are now showing that there is little difference (in terms of dental problems) between those who have drunk (long term) from fluoridated and un-fluoridated water supplies. What is disturbing now, though, is that science is showing Water Fluoridation can potentially cause Brain Tissue Damage, risks to the thyroid gland, weaken bone strength (possibly even bone cancer), Renal Failure, Headaches and Docility. Studies are even showing the potential for decreased IQ. Despite this, the battle to remove it from our drinking water is still an ongoing struggle. Many countries have acknowledged the scientific studies, with 97% of Europe now water Fluoride-free.
Sadly, the changes in the US & UK are slow. In the UK, the dental profession still defends the benefits of Fluoride and certain areas of the UK (including where I live) still practice Water Fluoridation. I have a Reverse Osmosis water filtration system which removes most of the toxicity, but they’re not cheap! I took the decision when I suffered rapid Kidney shut down a few years ago (I’m fine now!) and I really see the benefits. The battle to create exposure of this kind of toxicological warfare is ongoing and we must be vigilant. But this is not the only assault on our health that we should be aware of. Additional to our drinking water is the food we eat.
Food toxicification is the bane of my life! We all know about the benefits of home grown food or local produce; avoiding pre-packaged meals like the plague or continually going down the chippy! These are obvious and I won’t go into any detail here… I’m referring to the chemical hell hound of the Donald Rumsfeld era of GD Searle company: Aspartame.
This little bastard is in everything!! I get so pissed off sometimes, spending twice the amount of time as I want, buying a treat or a snack. Reading the bloody ingredients to find Aspartame or one of it’s siblings: Sucralose, Saccharine, Acesulfame Potassium, Acesulfame K, etc, etc, etc… I end up leaving with nothing! Healthy food is great, but it’s so boring! I miss cheap sweets and fizzy pop! However, I am doing the right thing, because this stuff is potentially lethal. People eat Aspartame by the shed load and don’t have any ideas about what it does.
Aspartame was conceived as a dietary and diabetic alternative to sugar and can be found in 98% of low calorie & diet foods/drinks. But it doesn’t stop there. Nearly all confectioners will use some form of derivative. Coca Cola company puts it in just about everything it makes. But that’s hardly surprising when you look into the real history of that particular brand name. In the US, the FDA has received hundreds of thousands (if not more) Neurological complaints with Aspartame connections and never acted on them.
Aspartame is 50% Phenylanaline, 40% Aspartic Acid and 10% Methyl Ether and it is this component that causes the problem. It’s artificial production and structure results in it breaking down into free Methyl Alcohol/Wood Alcohol and ultimately Formaldehyde (embalming fluid). Inert Aspartame has been found in some MSG capsules and it is well known that experiments with MSG in baby food created holes in the brains of rats when tested. The list of health conditions that can occur from Aspartame are shocking. Here are some examples:
- Septicaemia
- Auto Immune Disease
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Cardio Myopathy
- Hearing Loss
- Short Term Memory Loss
- Decreased availability of Serotonin
- Mania
- Bi-Polar Disorder
- Depression
- Seizures
- Nervous Breakdown
To get an idea of the corporate cover-up that is the Aspartame story, I suggest you learn more about GD Searle’s 52 week study on Monkeys in 1970. Needless to say, it wasn’t good for the monkeys! I can also recommend: “Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World” (an excellent documentary film about Aspartame)
If you want to learn more about Water Fluoridation research, I really hope that people will take the time to read the vast studies that have been accrued over the years (a good website is www.fluoridealert.org ). But if you’re starting out and want the basics, I suggest Christopher Bryson’s “The Fluoride Deception” (book or documentary film).
I planned to keep “The Un-Natural War” to 3 parts, but I think it’s important to conclude with something that I’ve had some first hand experience of… something that I think sums up the nature of an unseen biological warfare battleground and raises questions of a larger agenda: “Mandatory Vaccinations”
See you in Part Four.
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
