Reading between the lines is sometimes the only way to get an idea of the bigger picture… the hidden agenda, as it were. Such is the case with the 2010 document: “Global Governance 2025: At A Critical Juncture” . This curiosity is the brain child of a collaboration between representatives of the US National Intelligence Council (NIC) and the European Union’s Institute For Security Studies (EUISS). The former is very important, not only because it falls under the control of the US President, but also due to the direct connections it has with the National Security Council, the Homeland Security Council, the National Intelligence Program and numerous branches of the US intelligence community. The latter is also hugely influential in matters of European security, defence and intelligence.
“Global Governance” also had extensive input from the Atlantic Council of the US (ACUS), The Trans-Atlantic Policy Network (TPN), The US State Department, The Committee On Foreign Relations of The European Parliament, The Centre on International Co-Operation (New York University), The World Economic Forum, PFC Energy and contributions from 8 different multi-national organisations involved in international affairs, media, research, strategy and security studies. So “Global Governance” is no hoax document!
Despite being largely unknown to many and almost totally ignored by mainstream media, the document is totally unclassified and easily downloadable from the internet. In fact, it has been estimated that there are over 5.5 million articles written on the net about “Global Governance”. So what is the significance of this opus?
Upon initial reading, there appears little that is damning about the contents. However this impression is extremely misleading. The report represents one of the first ‘official’ partnerships between US and European institutions, although anybody who knows anything about the history of The Bilderberg Group (for example) knows that that a document like this is simply building upon what has been a long established collaboration… and a, just as long, established agenda for global affairs. Like many other “damning documents”, it also makes use of a complex system of forecasting (or creating) trends and future shocks.
The report was created “to assess the framework and long term prospects of a global governance process”. It makes numerous references to an “international agenda” applied with “mutually agreed instruments”. However, it also goes out of it’s way to stress that it is not a proposal for ‘Global Government’, which the authors claim is a totally different and undesired outcome. What is being said here is technically true.
For a long time, I have been frustrated with certain notions that The New World Order or Agenda is a plan for a single government, single authority, single currency, etc. and taken, by some, literally. I have always believed that the agenda is a multi-tentacled beast, with no obvious face and certainly not wielding such obvious and blunt weapons as a global ‘whatever’…
In line with my belief, “Global Governance” seems to confirm this. With a universal agenda, it doesn’t matter how many faces there are, they’ll all be ultimately dancing to the same tune. The report states that “the main risk to be averted is the creation of different formats that mirror competing geopolitical conditions. Such a development would defeat much of the basic purpose”. It asserts that “a needed precondition is for all the stakeholders to trust the system, commit to collective action, and accept stronger perogatives of international institutions over their domestic governance”.
Initial to the process are organisations such as the G8 and G20, The BRIC countries, the IEA, OPEC, the OECD, the IMF, the Federal Reserve, The World Bank, etc. Regarding the perceived idea of G20 currently being centred on economic matters, the report states: “as issues become challenging or crisis driven, common interests may expand beyond facilitating an economic recovery, requiring the G20 to expand it’s AGENDA further”. You don’t have to be labelled a “conspiracy theorist” to see this happening right now.
Key also, is the involvement of NGOs (Non Government Organisations) and embracing “hybrid, public-private partnership (PPPs)… emerging as an important feature of global governance innovation”. Under the proposed ‘agenda’, it is interesting to see that the report notes: “There is institutional Darwinism and we will see the survival of the fittest institutions”. The rhetorical question should be asked, who sets the standard of ‘the fittest’? Those dictating the agenda presumably…
It also strangely refers to other institutions such as international business, big pharma, security agencies, the media and crisis management outfits like WHO and FEMA, as integral to the overall process. In relation to this, “Global Governance” hammers home this idea of ‘global threats’. Terrorism is obviously discussed, but also ‘Climate Change’, energy security, overpopulation and migration, dwindling resources, threats from biotechnology, infectious diseases and pandemics. This is where the report seems to have an epiphany of multiple “new pearl harbour” musings. An air of foreboding and fear is created in these discussions, however one conclusion is reached in relation to all these aspects: being able to control the outcome would ultimately advance the agenda.
On the matter of terrorism, security and potential state conflicts, a “proactive management of state fragility” is proposed. Including “political intervention” and “the threat of or use of military force”. This one speaks for itself really. The Japanese participant in the report, tellingly reveals “the world will be a sad place if by 2025 we have not legalised quick military intervention for humanitarian causes in case of failing states. We will need a new legal system for sending quick military intervention squads”. Humanitarian my arse! It’s just an excuse for quick regime change in those regions that won’t capitulate to the agenda.
Regarding ‘climate change’ (or more accurately, the myth of it), there is another example of seizing opportunities (engineered or otherwise): “a crisis such as an environmental catastrophe… could spark co-operation”. As for an event triggered by a bio weapon: “ a biological attack has a psychological impact that outstrips lethality, placing democratic governments under severe pressure to respond forcefully”. Is this a false flag event in the making?! Notice the emphasis on “psychological impact”…
In relation to the health of the population, “Global Governance” praises the work of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and their work with the Global Alliance on Vaccines and Immunizations. Firstly, I wouldn’t touch Bill Gates with a barge pole and I trust vaccination programs even less. Never the less, the report does mention flu pandemics and emerging diseases on several occasions… and emphasises that prevention is paramount.
The report also mentions that “rapidly falling costs will bring biotechnology within reach of the hacker community”. A remark presumably designed to point out that such advances can only be safe in the hands of the ‘agenda’ players. However, I don’t feel very safe when they make comments like: “future capabilities open the possibilities for designing humans with unique physical, emotional or cognitive abilities”. Sounds like The Borg to me!
One thing that all “Damning Documents” have in common, is the crucial role that modern communications and media outlets will play in shaping the agenda. “Widespread use of the internet - probably has been the most important vehicle spurring the expanded role of civil society groups and public opinion at large in ‘agenda setting’”. The report spells it out clearly with the following: “persuasion and legitimacy (require) as much attention as military, economic and political weight”.
What gives “Global Governance” an edge in the ‘damning documents’ stakes, is the inclusion of several “fictionalised scenarios”. These take place between now and 2025 and are used to highlight the preferred outcome of a global agenda in the future. The scenarios are real oddities though, given that they include events such as food shortages, pandemics, economic breakdown, the rise of China as the dominant superpower, the threat of a nuclear conflict between the US and China and huge tidal waves that wipe out millions of people.
The significance of these doomsday scenarios remains unclear. Are they shock tactics leading us to conclude they can only be avoided if the agenda exists? Are they subtle warnings of false flag events to come? Who knows.
What I have presented here is only a brief overview of a handful of the main “Damning Documents“ that relate to a global agenda for the future of mankind.. To really makes sense of any document that paints a suspicious picture, I suggest you seek them out and read them for yourself.
If nothing else, they confirm what we see around us everyday.
When presented with the facts, it becomes harder to dismiss these perceptions as the musings of paranoid nutters.
I could easily be called a nutter!
But I’m a nutter in the know!!
Knowledge is power.
Till Next Time…
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
When examining the numerous “Damning Documents” that indicate the presence of a planned global agenda, the most hotly debated is the unusually named “Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars”. For not only does the item itself convey a seemingly unconventional approach to it’s subject matter, it also has a (now infamous and ambiguous) origin story… something that I will discuss further on.
“Silent Weapons” or SWFQW, purports to be an “Operations Research Technical Manual” (TM-SW7905.1). It is dated as being produced in 1979 and is discussed by many as being part of a series of similar training manuals. Claims have been made that it is a CIA training manual issued to high level agents, though this remains unconfirmed. The document also states that the principles of the work evolved from the “Operations Research” (O.R.) developed through the strategic and tactical methodology of military management in England in WW2. This line of research is intrinsically connected to the work of The Tavistock Institute. What a lovely pedigree… if true!
I will start with a brief overview of the document, so if you’re already familiar with it and want to read the rest of my post… skip the next few paragraphs! The aim of SWFQW is to explain the processes that have been engaged upon an unwitting public in order to better distract and control said population. These processes include an advanced (for the time) system of economic engineering which incorporates varying and all pervasive degrees of social control. However, the system would be applied through a system of automation (with checks and balances), take advantage of the inherent psychological and emotional flaws in human nature (ultimately using our own nature against ourselves) and enhancing those aspects of our day to day lives that advance the “quiet war”. The masses must absolutely not become aware of this self-proclaimed declaration of war. Therefore the approach would be need to be systemic and stealthy… hence the name: Silent Weapons.
Unlike “Report From Iron Mountain“ (which only vaguely states the use of a complex system), SWFQW goes to great lengths to explain it’s included methodology and models. The declaration of a “quiet war” was made possible by advances in engineering, electronics, computing, simplex methods of linear programming, the transistor and the creation of the Maser (throughout the 1940s and 50s), combined with the Rockefeller funded: “Harvard Economic Research Project” and US Air Force involvement. SWFQW states that “the combination was irresistible”. It also states that the process was initiated at a meeting of the “International Elite” in 1954. Some have claimed that this was the first Bilderberg Group meeting, but remains difficult to verify.
What makes SWFQW more unusual is the inclusion of mathematical equations and schematic diagrams to represent the processes. “These are used to apply values to human consumption, commodities, the ebb and flow of currency, etc, to establish a model for which predictions and manipulation methods can be developed. Methods that would have a controlling effect on the people and benefit those controlling the economic system”.
It also talks about the use of economic “shock testing” (based on the aviation model of measuring echoes or reflections of the recoil impulse in airframes), “paper inductance / inflation” (exchanging true value for inflated currency), “future shock”, “computer association of personal preferences” (via UPCs, bar codes, etc.), “identifying consumers” (initially via credit cards and ultimately through a “permanent tattooed body number invisible under ambient illumination”) and finally, “balancing the system” (via gradually “killing off the true creditors of this exchange” - the public).
What has truly earned SWFQW it’s damning label, is the “ruthlessly candid” approach it takes… “with no agonizing over religious, moral or cultural values”. It makes numerous references to the people as “beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent”, that a “world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals”, and that “low class elements… must be brought under control, i.e., must be housebroken, trained and assigned a yoke and long-term social duties from a very early age”.
The document also discusses the finer details of specific factors in the process. Monitoring all associations, relations, communication, loyalties, documentation, banking, assets, debts, claims, eating and drinking habits, fuel consumption, entertainment likes and dislikes, religious faiths, political tendencies, hobbies, hospital records… in fact every aspect of our lives in relation to this continuing system. It also proposes creating controlled situations such as: the availability of opportunities and commodities, output of advertising, news and the media, emotional distraction and the disintegration of the family unit.The ultimate goal seems to be the creation of ignorance, preoccupation, conformity, apprehension, and isolation; and the removal of self identity, defence mechanisms, faith, knowledge, awareness and social cohesion.
SWFQW’s opening passages make a claim of authenticity, based on the inside knowledge of several (one retired) individuals employed by or connected to Military Intelligence. For a long time, the story of it’s origins, placed it’s discovery in an old surplus IBM copy machine (in 1986) by a Boeing Aircraft employee. This story was never truly substantiated though. Through inclusion in his various writings, some have laid claim of authorship at the feet of William Cooper (of “Behold A Pale Horse” fame), although he has fervently denied this. Another writer, Delamar Duverus (of the American Sunbeam), was also associated.
It seemed for a while that the mystery had been put to bed, when one Hartford Van Dyke stepped up to the plate. However, this is where the story starts to be become, at worst, murky; at best, truly Twilight Zone! Maybe I have been negligent in my research or I‘ve simply overlooked some information, but I can’t seem to get a consistent profile of Hartford Van Dyke. He appears to be an enigmatic and factually elusive fellow, who’s story initially appears contradictory from source to source and finally seems to vanish off the face of the earth.
From 2003 onwards, one Joan d’Arc (a writer for Paranoia Magazine) began researching Van Dyke in relation to SWFQW. This lead the publication of some letters written by Van Dyke (who was, at the time, involved in a legal dispute that led to a prison sentence), where he claimed to be the document’s author. He explained how his father had been involved in the true history of the “Pearl Harbour” incident. His father’s silence, regarding his knowledge of the incident, spurred Van Dyke Jr. down a ‘truth’ path.
Van Dyke claimed that he came clean about SWFQW, after somebody voiced concerns regarding it becoming a source of disinformation. He mused on how, in the early days, he had distributed numerous copies to several individuals. One such person was a military officer at McChord Air Force Base, Washington. It has been debated that this may have been the source of the ‘IBM Copy Machine’ story.
Van Dyke’s character and credibility has been coloured by much speculation. He has described himself as a "Non-Union Lawyer" and also as a "Commercial Lawyer", an exponent of the Commercial Lien Strategy of placing liens on law-breaking public officials on account of specific wrongdoing. It seems that this may be the reason for his incarceration, although he has never been fully specific himself about this. One source claimed that the official federal courts website contained the details of his trial, although a thorough search shows nothing relating to him. It seems that around the mid 2000s, he was still in prison…corroborated by letters he wrote about a hunger strike he had partaken. Although unsupported, one individual claims he was still in prison in late 2008. Other than this, I can find nothing more concrete. Is he still in prison? What was the true nature of his crime? If anybody knows, feel free to comment.
His crime may relate to allegations that have been levelled at him from other sources. One website claims he was allegedly convicted of "trying to pass $3 million in bogus currency that featured a photo of the Queen of England". Another site connects him with Roger Elvick, who some credit as the founder of the “Redemption Process” or “Commercial Redemption”. These movements connect to the fraudulent nature of The Federal Reserve and aspects of the current legal and economic system, amongst other things. Others have associated Van Dyke with the “Freeman On The Land” movement. One, bizarrely, claims he is a proponent of The Theosophical Society! Those who have an interest in decrying Van Dyke’s claims seem to support him and vice versa. The whole thing is puzzling and for these reasons, I simply don’t know what to think about his claims of authorship.
Regardless of ownership, some have questioned the authenticity of SWFQW through it’s use of terminology and language. Some say that it is clumsily written. Others say that a government or think tank document would not use terms such as: “ruling elite” and “pecking order”. There are also the references to UPCs, bar codes and credit cards… which some say didn’t exist at the time. If SWFQW was written in the late 1970s, then they were all in existence. Even if written earlier, there is evidence of these inventions from the 1950s onwards… even if only small scale applications or theoretical.
There is also the question of the equations and diagrams. A few weeks ago I spent a huge amount of time contacting some trusted individuals who were either trained, educated or worked in the fields of electronics, mathematics, engineering, physics, etc. I also contacted some fellow truth researchers who had a similar background. Not everybody got back to me (fair enough, they’re busy people!), but a good few did (many thanks… you know who you are!). There were also a couple of other people that I’ve more recently got acquainted with and wanted to speak to on the matter, but time was against me! Not having a huge understanding of this area (I get the basics!), I wanted to pick the brains of some reliable and learned folk. I posed the question: (trying to ignore the nature and implications of “Silent Weapons”) Do the included equations and diagrams have a basis in fact?
The almost unanimous conclusion was this: taken alone, the equations are difficult to dismiss. They do have a fundamental grounding in electronic, mathematical and scientific principles. They are not simply gibberish. Whoever conceived them, knew what they were doing. What did surprise me was: they all (even fellow researchers) did not want me to refer to them individually for fear of damaging their credibility. Maybe that was because of the context in which I’m writing… who knows, but I will respect their wishes.
Lastly, there is the obvious factor. It’s not proof, but it makes you wonder. Above and beyond most damning documents, “Silent Weapons” shows an incredible amount of foresight regarding the times we now live. We have all become prisoners of a corrupt and corporate banking system that exists on the principles of usuary, paper currency with no intrinsic value. We have a system based on inflation and interest rates, that would not continue without debt, loans and bailouts. We may as well have a currency system based on the value of pin pong balls for all the good it would currently do us. More tellingly, few ordinary folk realise the scale of obfuscation regarding this monetary enslavement.
It is the quintessential ‘Silent Weapon’…
Furthermore, the degradation of our privacy, communities, emotional and psychological well being, independent media and culture is shockingly real. Even if “Silent Weapons” doesn’t exist as a bona fide “official” document, it still serves as a stark reality call regarding the world being pulled over our eyes today.
Next Up: Global Governance 2025
Till Next Time!
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
