London 2012 - Part 3: “Close Encounters of the Olympic Kind”

Before I start I just want to reiterate my stance, whilst addressing the information I’m presenting on the London 2012 Olympics subject. The information gathered (in all parts of this blog series) is mostly the collective findings of others and doesn’t necessarily reflect my own position. Where possible, I will interject my own thoughts and stance, but please don’t assume that I’m encouraging a specific viewpoint – especially that of false-flag (or any other kind of) terrorism at The Games! The point is to present an overview of the varying information and beliefs out there. It is vital that we all keep a balanced perspective and draw our conclusions in our own ways. As I have stated in the first two parts of this series, I will address my own theories in the final section of these blogs. Remember that we will all know soon enough if anything is to occur! The story (and speculation!) is rapidly changing - this means that information can become outdated pretty much as soon as it’s posted. This is especially difficult for me as I am often very busy in my non-truth / music related work (more so, lately!), so I don’t get the chance to post, drop in on other people’s work or keep up to date with information, anywhere near as much as I’d like to. With this in mind, I just want to take the opportunity to say many thanks, as always, for your continued readership and the support and encouragement I receive from you all. I truly appreciate it.

 In part two, I addressed the subject of illusion in relation to the Olympic Games. The two seem to go hand in hand, as witnessed on several occasions. The opening and closing ceremonies of The Games seem to be a showcase of ritual, symbolism and trickery, which is often interpreted by the viewer as “magical”. One such notion (which falls into this arena) is the Olympic flirtation with the Extra-Terrestrial phenomenon.

The most well-known of these occurrences took place during the Los Angeles Olympic Games in 1984, where (as part of the ceremonies) a huge UFO descended over the stadium and deposited an alien creature who “saluted” all those involved in The Games. The scene was reminiscent of the movie “Close Encounters of the Third Kind”, with the craft using music to communicate back and forth with the Olympic stadium. Strangely, before the “alien” addressed the crowds, there was a laser battle in the air accompanied by some incidental music from “Star Wars”. If this was a one-off, then there probably wouldn’t be anything to speculate about. Yet with the continual and numerous references to Aliens and UFOs (in relation to The Olympics), you do have to ask why?

 This kind of connection has been quite apparent during the run up to the London Games. When “Lord” Coe unveiled one of the earliest promotional videos, which presented an animated construction of the stadium, many wondered what significances could be gleaned from the sight of numerous pod craft buzzing around the London skyline, what look symbolically like giant steel Alien robots lumbering through the streets, and a huge mother ship – all of which form parts of the stadium. After the stadium is filled with people, the entire structure breaks apart and is sucked into a spiral vortex. It is very similar to certain alien invasion movies, such as “Skyline” - which I will address again shortly.

 We have also had the “loveable” mascots: Wenlock and Mandeville. This pair of one-eyed oddities, look like they belong up a child’s nose! The child angle is appropriate given the intended target audience for the mascots. When unveiled, countless school children were asked about them and the response was fairly unanimous: “they’re aliens!” The official blurb said that they were formed from droplets of steel during the stadium construction.

 Interestingly, there has been a well-known video circulating the web lately. The animated short: “Olympic Aliens – Man Vs. Alien”, was allegedly made by a bunch of school children and features ETs firing arrows toward the Earth from a nearby planet. The intended target is the Olympic stadium.

 In 2010, Eddie Izzard presented the “Games Maker volunteering” advert with the opening lines: “Ladies and gentlemen of the world… and other worlds who may be listening… The greatest show on Earth!” Recent ads associating BT Infinity and The Games showed shafts of blue light coming from the sky and energising the participating athletes. The scene illuminates the London skyline and is eerily reminiscent of the scenes from “Skyline” – where descending plumes of blue energy herald an alien attack upon humanity.

 Speaking of the sci-fi movie / Olympic angle, it cannot have escaped anyone’s attention how often they have crossed paths. The Olympic rings are visible in the background of a scene in the 1996 movie “Independence Day”. The motif appears as a boy watches the ET arrival on TV. The film also has some interesting 9/11 clues and foreshadowing. Another movie with a connection is M Night Shyamalan’s alien invasion flick: “Signs”. The morning after Mel Gibson and Joaquim Phoenix’s characters witness a creature on their roof in the dead of night, a police woman asks them who they might have seen. They discuss how fast it moved, which quickly dovetails into a conversation about the agility of Olympic athletes.

 One of the most notable associations is integral to the plot of Carl Sagan’s “Contact”. The film of 1997 follows an almost identical narrative route as Sagan’s original novel from 1985. The plot revolves around an ET message intercepted from space. The initial message (of repeated prime numbers) is embedded with a retransmission of “Earth's first television signal broadcast powerful enough to escape the ionosphere and be received in interstellar space; in this case, Adolf Hitler's opening speech at the 1936 Summer Olympics in Berlin.” (Wikipedia) The Berlin Games boasted a closed-circuit television system and radio network that reached 41 countries, with many other forms of expensive high-tech electronic equipment. This event began the ever more elaborate means to which The Games would be utilised as a MSM illusory psyop.

 There is a noteworthy line in the film, spoken by enigmatic aerospace tycoon S.R. Hadden (played by John Hurt): “The powers that be have been quite busy lately, falling over each other to position themselves for the game of the century, if not the millennium.” This quote functions on multiple levels…

 There are also connections in certain areas of music. The London based band: "The Winter Olympics", released a song entitled: "They Launched a Probe" with an interesting accompanying video. It begins with the London skyline (London attractions, buildings and monuments silhouetted in the background) followed by hundreds of Alien ships descending upon London. There is also a craft in orbit which fires a beam directly at London. http://thewinterolympicsband.tumblr.com/Bio

 Returning to the publicity machine for a moment, I was curious about a similar connection that was touted by UK’s Sun newspaper, some time ago. A manmade crop circle was commissioned by the newspaper before London won the bid to host the Olympic Games, “the official story as to their reason for doing so was to help in London’s bid for the Olympic Games.” The headlines included: “Aliens Back Our Bid” and ”London Bid Is Out Of This World”. The circle was created by John Lundberg’s outfit “Circlemakers” and became part of a slew of similar style formations. http://www.circlemakers.org/olympics.html

 The true nature of Crop Circles is a subject for another blog entirely, however Richard D Hall’s film “Crop Circles – The Hidden Truth” revealed some important issues relating to manmade formation and (particularly) John Lundberg. In the film he addresses the “Project Blackbird” debacle of 1990 – where UK government agencies and the military became involved in investigating / debunking / discrediting (take your pick!) the phenomenon. RDH raises compelling circumstantial evidence about the background of Lundberg. He noted that in the past, the website carried a recruiting banner for MI5. He also looked at the html source code for the site. The second keyword (after "crop circle makers") is MI5.

 Other keywords include security service, British security service, spy, intelligence, CIA, espionage and terrorism. One of Lundberg’s articles (dated 06/03/2004) says, "Well, it looks like veteran crop circle researcher Colin Andrews might be forced to go get a real job! He's posted an urgent appeal for funds on his website... If all else fails maybe Colin could join MI5's psyops department and retrain as a crop circle maker..." RDH questioned the nature of Circlemakers’ funding and discovered another item on the website: "You'd be surprised how expensive running a successful website can be, don't panic, we're not going to ask you for money... our retainer from sources we'd rather not disclose has kept our virtual head above water." http://www.richplanet.net/cropcircles.php

 It does raise the question of why The Sun has used crop circles (of all things) to promote The London Olympic Games, and also why they decided to recruit individuals who are (potentially) military intelligence assets…

 I also have reason to believe that this “alien” aspect may be incorporated into The London Games’ closing ceremony. Recently revealed images from the dress rehearsals show an unusual laser light show which is very reminiscent of those seen in Jeff Wayne’s stage version of his musical “War of the Worlds”. I must stress that this does NOT mean that I am suggesting it is part of an alien false-flag scenario… just that it has possibly been incorporated into the “entertainment”.

 It is odd how numerous stories have appeared in the MSM regarding readiness for the “inevitable alien arrival”. Here are a few examples:

• “We'll probably have a close encounter this century says leading physicist who warns governments to be ready” (16 July 2012) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2174136/Aliens-Well-probably-close-encounter-century-says-leading-physicist-warns-governments-ready.html#ixzz21BHYjOCq
• “Extra-terrestrial False Flag Operation to Begin in August, 2007?” (Sun Jun 24, 2007) http://exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-50.htm
• “Krugman Repeats Alien Invasion Defence Idea to Save Economy” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/06/21/paul-krugman-alien-invasion_n_1612973.html?utm_hp_ref=weird-news
• “MI5 have heard that little green men are planning to touch down in Stratford this July” (Stratford is, of course, where the Olympic Games are being held.)
• “The U.S. military is making plans in case of an alien invasion” - MSN Australia Alien Invasion Interview

And, obviously, this piece of farce from Nick Pope:

• “Keep an eye on the skies for saucers during the Olympics Games, warns former MoD UFO expert” http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2155885/Keep-eye-skies-saucers-Olympics-Games-warns-MoD-UFO-expert.html#ixzz214ThgbL5

 In the earlier days of his research, Ian R Crane alluded to a possible false-flag alien attack scenario which could perhaps be unveiled at The London 2012 Games - although he has, more recently, expanded his views to encompass much more of the information available. Numerous others have subsequently suggested his  original instincts also. I am not attacking (to be clear) this line of research or their credibility when I say that I do feel it is unlikely (unless it was pulled off incredibly realistically) that such an event will occur. As with the false-flag terrorist scenario, it seems a little too obvious and (unlike a false-flag terrorist attack) I suspect that even the sleeping masses would struggle to swallow it. However the question does still remain: why the connection?

 It is possible that keeping the subject at the forefront of folk’s minds, accommodates the needs of the moment or an agenda further down the line. Some suggest that it is predictive programming, readied for when the “alien aspect” needs to be trotted out. Others believe that it is an acclimatisation program, preparing us for a managed (but far from complete) disclosure of the ET phenomenon. There is also the possibility that it is a carefully orchestrated disinformation programme. I will reserve my judgement here though.

Many thanks to Andrew Johnson, who recently posted some very timely observations by Richard D Hall.

“I could be wrong but see what you think.  The Daily Mail has put out a lot of news items now suggesting alien visitation and possible invasion.  However, I do not think these articles are intended for “Joe Public” and to manipulate the masses general frame of mind.  WHY?  Because these articles never appear in the actual printed Daily Mail, they usually only appear in the “Science” section of the on line Daily Mail.  My parents sometimes get the Daily Mail and whenever anything is printed related to aliens or 9/11, etc., they cut it out and give it to me.  None of these alien stories have been in the printed papers.  If this WAS a move to get the public to accept aliens, and accept a possible alien invasion they would have put them in their main newspaper.”

“People like you and me and people who mistrust the mainstream get a lot more information online.  I think the whole alien invasion information could be targeting the truth movement to try and get everyone in the truth movement on the “alien false flag” band wagon.  So when they carry out their al Qaeda / Iranian false flag attack, the majority of whistle-blowers can be discredited by telling the public that these people are nuts, they were saying a minute ago that aliens would invade the Olympics and now they are saying the government did it... There are certain people who have been pushing the alien theory more than others.

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Cognoscence/message/5801

It is certainly worth considering this perspective.

 It is important to remain level headed, keep an open mind in these situations and try never to say “never”. There is a huge amount of credible research out there regarding holographic technology and certain aspects of projects such as “Bluebeam”, which cannot really be dismissed…. AND, we must also consider the DEW technology which was almost certainly utilised on 9/11. However, just because the means to perpetrate an “event” exists, it doesn’t necessarily mean it will be used at the London Olympic Games.

 We all know that if a terrorist attack or alien incursion doesn’t take place during the events, people will simply say that nothing happened or was ever going to happen. It could also have the effect of making much of the alternative community look like a right bunch of melons. However, “nothing obvious happening”, does NOT mean that nothing has happened, is happening or will happen… far from it. I will be addressing this misperception of London 2012 shortly.

 This part of the blog series completes (thank goodness!) my look at some of the speculative aspects of The 2012 Games… at least until I present my own wacky ideas in the concluding part. From here on, I will look at what has been apparent for a while – tons of strangeness ranging from architecture and symbolism, to numerology and ritual.

I will leave you with this wonderful observation from "So Long, and Thanks for All the Fish" by Douglas Adams:

“You mean they actually vote for the lizards?”

“Oh yes,” said Ford with a shrug, “of course.”

“But,” said Arthur, going for the big one again, “why?”

“Because if they didn’t vote for a lizard,” said Ford, “the wrong lizard might get in."

Until next time…

The Truth Seeker’s Guide.

Part 1: "The Culture of Fear" -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-1-culture-of-fear.html
Part 2: “Zion, Messiahs, Plagues… Oh My!” -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-2-zion-messiahs.html
Part 3: "Close Encounters of the Olympic Kind" -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-3-close-encounters-of.html
Part 4: "Shadows and Symbols" -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-4-shadows-and-symbols.htm
Part 5: “London Calling” -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-5-london-calling.html

Part 6: "And Finally... Some Mind Games!" -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-6-and-finally-some.html

The Opening Ceremony of The London Olympics 2012 -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/the-opening-ceremony-of-london-olympics.html

The Who Sell Out - London Olympics Closing Ceremony -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/the-who-sell-out-london-olympics.html

The Paralympic Games, Saturn Worship and Other Oddities -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/the-paralympics-saturn-worship-and.html


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

Exopolitics Great Britain 2012

The UK Exopolitics (GB) Conference 2012 is in the planning stages. The conference is hugely important as it is a platform for some of the most respected researchers in the field and an opportunity to spread the word about issues that really should be in the public consciousness.

Exopolitics is the study of "the art or science of government as concerned with guiding or influencing governmental policy towards extraterrestrial phenomena and extraterrestrial beings" (Stephen Bassett)

The conference has been held in Leeds since 2009 and has played host to the likes of Ian R Crane, Richard D Hall, Andrew Johnson, Anthony Beckett, Nick Pope, Lloyd Pye, Stephen Bassett, Richard Dolan, Mary Rodwell, David Griffin, Steven Jones, Alan Foster, Bryce Zabel, Gary Heseltine, Richard C Hoagland, Gerard Aartsen, Richard Lawrence, Max Burns, Robbie Graham &  Bridget Barclay.

Supporting this event is crucial in allowing the conference to expand in 2012. Please show your support by visiting the following links and maybe buying a box set of DVDs featuring lectures from the three annual events. Exopolitics GB needs as much financial support as possible so please do what you can.

All The Best!
The Truth Seeker's Guide

WEBSITE
http://www.exopoliticsgb.com/

DVDS
http://www.richplanet.net/more.php
http://www.exopoliticsgb.com/catalog/conference-dvds

Richard D Hall interviews Anthony Beckett & Andrew Johnson on Richplanet TV -
includes highlights of the 2011 Conference and what to look forward to in 2012
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=86&part=1
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=86&part=2
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=86&part=3


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

BBC's "9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip"

   Television coverage of the 10th anniversary of 9/11 has been somewhat different from what I expected. Granted there are still a few days to go yet, but it appears that the media propaganda machine has been completely bewildered as to how to go about their annual reconviction of the ‘official’ story. In the UK, the BBC, ITV and Channel 4 have all (aside a rehashed and laughable 9/11 Conspiracy Files ‘update’ from the BBC) taken the softly, softly approach this year, with the emphasis truly being on the tragedy/loss of life angle. Such programs (a correct use of the word if ever used) were book-ended with a reminder of said ‘official’ account of events and filled with endless examples of lives ended and families torn apart. Whilst I truly feel for these people and always endeavour to try never to besmirch or make a mockery of their memory, this approach is slightly more misleading than people may initially think. It is, sadly, one of the many callous examples of how broadcasters (especially the BBC, but  numerous others also) use to emotionally manipulate the sentiments and rationality of the viewer.

   The BBC finally decided to shift the gears today and present to us “9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip” on BBC Three. It was presented by comedian Andrew Maxwell, who took five “conspiracy theorists” on a trip to America to see if they could get them to “change their mind” about their particular views. They consisted of Charlotte Scott Hays, Emily Church, Shazin Nurse, Rodney Chavrimotoo (hope that’s right!) and, the now infamous, Charlie Veitch.

   The first five minutes set the standard BBC tone, with a voice over by Mr Maxwell, where he reinforced the ‘official’ story and stated that he was “as certain as certain can be that Osama Bin Laden ordered the attacks”. This was followed by an introduction to the five “theorists”, interspersed with shots of them crying and shouting at each other. Without going to far off track, you may remember (from my “Popcorn For The Mind” blog series) that I looked into the media use of “love-bombing”, “divide and conquer” and “herd mentality” tactics in it’s programming. It’s certainly something worth looking out for in a re-watch of this program. These first five minutes are classic examples of social engineering aspects, with all the hallmarks of certain organisations: from Tavistock to Common Purpose. Methods that would have raised a knowing smile from the likes of researcher, Brian Gerrish!

   Andrew Maxwell pointed out that it was “unbelievable” that there were people out there who questioned the “truth” about 9/11. He first took the group to WTC Ground Zero, believing that by simply going there it would change their mind and giving them a “reality check”. This trite act is akin to taking a group of Ufologists to the desert in New Mexico and hoping they’ll raise their hands to the sky and shout, “My God I’ve Seen The Light!”. It trivialises any real attempt to present a critical analysis of 9/11 research, right off the bat.

   He went on to declare that the 9/11 Commission was “totally independent”… you only have to look into the people involved (including the farcically initial period with Henry Kissinger) to know that this is just a biased and misleading comment.

   The specific theories were represented by half a dozen of the (what I consider anyway) weaker aspects of 9/11 speculation. “Amateur pilots couldn’t have done it”. The program then went on to take the group to a flight school where one was taken up in a tiny two man plane and proceeded to fly it above Manhattan for ten minutes. The ‘expert’ flight instructor commented that “if you’re tender with the controls, you’ll probably land it first flight”. He claimed it was easy to navigate and land on a runway, but also said that it was “easier to fly a big jet”. If that were the case, then why isn’t everybody flying jets for British Airways within a day of signing up?! They then dropped in a sound bite of Shazin saying that she thought it would be easy to do it with a Boeing. Well I’m convinced already!…

   This section was closed with the statement: “All they had to do was fly straight and level”. Clearly this is a ridiculous observation. You need only look at the ‘official’ flight path, altitude and angle of Flight 77...

   Next up was the view that the US government screwed up their security procedures. This was quickly dismissed by a quick recollection of the ‘official’ account, with every aspect including the word “Did”. United Airlines pilot Buck Rogers (yes really!) made a staggering remark that there had never been one single aircraft hijacking in the US before 9/11. Where do these people learn their history?!

   At this point, it was obligatory to show the group arguing and shouting at each other, whilst Mr Maxwell (apt name!) called them “childlike” and “gullible”. Next stop was the controlled demolition theory. No physics, simple mathematics or laws of gravity here. Just demolition ‘expert’ Brent Blanchard (do some serious research on this man, you’ll be surprised what you find…) and his reassuring claim that “buildings NEVER fall OVER”, they are simply “compressed”. By now, Charlie Veitch was presented as having an epiphany: “It makes sense now”. The producers must have rubbing their hands with glee.

   Onto the means used to create a controlled demolition and Rodney was next to be ridiculed. “You would think that a science grad would be more rational”, said Andrew Maxwell (another example of nothing more than insult). Another ‘expert’ displayed combustion of a steel girder which was barely scratched, thus the “conspiracy theory” was definitively debunked. Charlie Veitch was, again viewed, voicing his opinion: “It’s becoming more and more unlikely that this stuff was used to bring down buildings… and planes DID mess up the buildings”. At this point, they showed Charlotte upset because “Charlotte has been relying on Charlie to back her up”.
Onto The Pentagon . The producers obviously didn’t want to touch this one at all, for fear of showing themselves up. They simply presented the ‘official’ commission approved animation of Flight 77’s impact… the one that removes an engine from the schematics in order that it fit’s the pattern of damage (see parts 7 and 8 of my 9/11 blog series, to understand this crucial evidence). Maxwell said here, “Do you think a missile could go in there unnoticed by the public… I think that’s nuts”. Please Mr Maxwell, much more of your profound knowledge and I’ll have to admit defeat and close my blog down…

   At this point I nearly choked from laughing when he said, “What’s more important, the truth or the right answer!”. If it wasn’t such a serious matter, I’d have almost mistaken it for a “Carry On…” film. More arguing and he accuses them of “sulking”. He finally shows himself for the dignified and morally superior being by walking off and saying, “Fuck Them!”. He then claims that the group “selectively hear things” and mentions something about Israel and MI5, claims that “Santa does not exist, how do you know he doesn’t exist… this is ludicrous”.

   A demonstration of physics followed, in order to explain the crash of Flight 93. This involved a pebble and a mound of flour, followed by the group throwing some eggs and water bombs. Seriously! You couldn’t make this stuff up!

   Onto voice analysis of the ‘passengers’ of ‘93 and an expert who bravely commented that the calls could have been edited or faked, however they were not really practical in “realtime”. Lots of crying for the finale, as the group met the mother of Mark Bingham. She said that her son often used his first name and surname in personal conversations because of habits he’d picked up in his profession  and commented that people “on the internet” had “not many brains”.

   The whole ordeal ended with more arguing and shouting and the final position of the group regarding 9/11. Charlie Veitch was praised as a “realist” because of his decision to renounce the “conspiracy” path and join the rest of the sheeple. At which point I could pretty much feel my brain running out of my ears and decided that an hour in the company of the BBC’s psychological manipulation machine was more than enough…

Top: Andy Thomas & David Icke
Bottom Left: Andrew Johnson
Bottom Right: Ian R Crane

   Overall, it was pretty much what I’d come to expect and wasn’t really surprised. I’ve maybe been a bit hard on Charlie Veitch and Andrew Maxwell. Sometimes, to coin a phrase, “they know not what they do”. I absolutely blame those further up the chain of command for ever approaching the matter in such a shallow and superficial way… but that was always inevitable. Imagine if someone in the BEEB had decided to take the likes of David Icke, Ian R Crane, Andrew Johnson and Andy Thomas on such a road trip?!! They probably could have only used about two minutes worth of footage. In fact, I can safely say that it would NEVER have happened.

   These people are ultimately afraid of the truth ever being revealed. There are literally hundreds, possibly thousands, of aspects that raise serious questions about the legitimacy of the ‘official’ 9/11 story. You cannot analyse a lie, cover up, inside job or “conspiracy” in one hour, with a superficial glance at 7 or 8 aspects. It simply won’t do. The fact that they keep coming back to the well, time and again, in such a derogatory manner is indicative of their need to continually reinforce dogma divert people from recognising their fears. And they are afraid, don‘t ever think they aren‘t. They are afraid of the implications, of people waking up, they are afraid of the reveal and they are afraid of YOU. Afraid because you can think and reason, learn and speak of it. Try not to get bogged down in semantics and arguments because, like the road trip, they’ll use that against you.

Be sensible, level headed and informed. I say this all the time but, at the risk of sounding like a scratched record, the truth really does speak for itself.
If we’re wise, we can show them how it’s really done!
Till Next Time,
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.

See also:
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/more-bbc-conspiracy-road-trips-on-way.html


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html