The central notion of the ‘official’ 9/11 account, is that of the perpetrators. Namely Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda. As this particular operation was based in Afghanistan, it seemed logical that this country would be the first target of the US “War On Terror”… a concept seemingly born in the aftermath of 9/11. Eventually, this ‘battle for freedom and democracy’ would expand into 2 wars and an eye on several other areas in the Middle East.
Because this quest stemmed from an event that had all the hallmarks of a ‘false flag event’, it seemed logical that (by extension) the War On Terror would also need to scrutinised for it’s credibility. Truth researchers didn’t need to look very far before they had serious questions to ask. In the fullness of time, mass public opinion was galvanised not so much by the questions of 9/11, rather the increasing questions of the morally and legally curious, conceit of this particular series of theatres.
Millions were awakened to the true nature of our politicians and the dealings of corporate methods. People marched through the streets of the world’s cities carrying banners that showed the growing sentiments of an increasingly aware populace. The implications were (and still are) huge. The true legacy of 9/11 is the creation of the largest social revolution, possibly, in the history of modern civilisation. It is for this reason alone that the powers that be, feel compelled to reinforce their perspective of history. A total fear of mass realisation.
It could be contended that had the West not reacted in any large scale way, 9/11 may have eventually been consigned to the quiet hole of history and those that attained awareness of global machinations would have remained in a very small minority, fringe group. The threat posed by our current global consciousness can be witnessed by the likes of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s numerous speeches about “global mass awakening” and the dangers it poses. Our news media daily reminds us the fight for freedom in these countries, highlighted by yet another death of a western soldier. It is this, not a daily reminder of the events of 9/11, that shows the true façade behind the ‘official’ mask.
The first war has been scrutinised for signs of the real agenda. Soon after 9/11, many pointed out the significance of the history behind the alleged 9/11 perpetrators. It has never escaped attention that Al-Qaeda (and by association Bin Laden) was born from “Soviet Era” days of the Mujahideen. With USSR’s intervention in Afghanistan to tackle the increased threat from the Mujahideen, the US had found the perfect opportunity (what with Cold War tensions) to ingratiate themselves in the situation.
History shows that during the Carter and Reagan administrations, the CIA (probably under the auspices of Bush Snr, Rumsfeld, Brzezinski and the like) financed, equipped and trained the Mujahideen on a huge, multi billion dollar scale. It should be noted (for the nitpickers) that the UK, Saudi Arabia, China, Pakistan and other countries, also played a role in this particular endeavour. However, it was the US that held the lion’s share of involvement, for the longest period of time.
It is also well documented that Bin Laden occupied a prominent position amongst the CIA backed operation. He was financed and equipped at length by the US in this period. With the end of the cold war, the Mujahideen collapsed into factional civil war engulfing the entire country. It was here that Al-Qaeda came into being, supported by the CIA, with the intention of becoming the dominant, victorious faction. A faction that in return would be most US friendly. “Former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook wrote that the word Al-Qaeda should be translated as "the database", and originally referred to the computer file of the thousands of Mujahideen militants who were recruited and trained with CIA help to defeat the Russians” (Wikipedia). Robin Cook is an integral player in the bigger picture and I will discuss him in my next blog.
History also shows that it may not have played out exactly as the US planned. The Taliban government became increasingly belligerent toward The West including stone walling the US gas pipeline from The Caspian Sea. Several companies including Unocal, a company with documented and lengthy connections to the administration in general (and George Bush specifically), had begun discussions with The Taliban in 1996 to begin construction of said pipeline. With things still stalled in 1998, a U.S. congressional hearing recorded a Unocal representative testify that “a gas pipeline through Afghanistan can't happen until there is a single internationally recognized stable government there“. He urged the US Government to use its influence to help find solutions to “all of the region's conflicts". By the end of 1998, Unocal had withdrawn it’s plans due to “lack of support and funding”. However, it is interesting that in 1999, it was discovered that the U.S. had paid the entire annual salary of every single Taliban government official in hopes of securing a stable government in Afghanistan in order to allow Unocal to build the pipeline. In May 2001, it was revealed that the US had given $43 million to Afghanistan, becoming the largest donor to Afghanistan for two years in a row. Within 8 months of 9/11, the US gas pipeline was given the go ahead.
Another interesting aspect is Afghanistan’s production of Poppy Opium. There are detailed accounts going back hundreds of years showing The West’s involvement in the influence of the Opium trade. Again, the CIA has had extensive involvement in the global drug trade and not for morally righteous reasons either. You need only look into the Iran Contra scandal to see the connections. By 2000, Afghanistan was responsible for 75% of the world’s Opium production. It seems strange that in July of the same year, The Taliban decided to ban cultivation of Opium Poppies in Afghanistan. By 2005, Opium production was surging again. In fact USA Today reported that the country was “in danger of becoming a narcotics state”.
There was also the inevitable boom in business for other companies. To paraphrase Donald Rumsfeld, “War is big business!”. The companies that secured the biggest deals were again (surprise, surprise), damningly connected to key administration individuals. Halliburton, of which Dick Cheney was CEO, gained massive middle eastern deals in the wake of 9/11 and the subsequent wars. These are just a few examples of the benefits that 9/11, and it’s repercussions, gave to US business and finance.
Many have claimed that 9/11 was the justification needed to create these theatres of war. It’s a big accusation to make… but not without precedence. In June of 2001, the US government had already discussed the possibility of a limited military action against The Taliban. By July (strangely coinciding with the ban on Opium cultivation), the US had restructured this “limited military action”. Now there were detailed invasion plans on the drawing board, with an inception date of October 2001... What a coincidence.
Documents show that US involvement in various peacekeeping operations were scheduled to continue no later than early September 2001. Both CBS and USA Today reported that The White House had approved plans to invade Afghanistan on September 4th, 2001. From this point on, huge numbers of US military troops, equipment and vehicles were dispatched to The Persian Gulf in anticipation of this plan.
Of course, one week later, we have 9/11. Within an hour or so of the initial events, Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda, The Taliban and Afghanistan were all blamed. By October (the pre-9/11 invasion date), the ‘coalition of the willing’ was there.
Unfortunately, this was only the beginning…
To Be Continued...
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
“Meet the new Agenda… same as the old Agenda!”.
Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you: The NEW New World Order! Same as the old one, just given a new lick of paint and a new label. The past few weeks have presented us with an incredible and (if it wasn’t so tragic) almost comical insight into new developments forming in “The Agenda”. To the novice, it would almost appear as if the “powers that be” don’t know their arse from their head. I’m not sure though that this situation can be dismissed so flippantly.
As I’ve written in previous posts, I tend to be a bit pragmatic and as a result I don’t buy into the whole N.W.O. zeitgeist in it’s entirety. I must be clear though: I never say I don’t believe it at all though. I struggle with some of the Annunaki bits and I also don’t buy into some of the 2012 Apocalypse / Rapture / End Times stuff (my non-denomination / almost non-spiritual ethos gets in the way a bit!). I do believe that there is an ultra powerful, minority cabal trying to steer the world according to a loose-ish plan. I call it “The Agenda“ (because agendas are flexible and subject to change), but I’m also ok with the New World Order tag.
I read an article a few days ago (I won’t name the source because I don’t think it was worth the webpage it was written on!!), pointing out the possibility of the Euro currency collapsing and the immanent ceiling smash of the US debt. This individual pointed out a load of other old bobbins and then declared: “THE NEW WORLD ORDER (if there ever was one) HAS FAILED”.
As I chuckled to myself I thought, “bless ‘em, if only it were that easy!”. Not wanting to be a pessimist, I really do hope the day comes soon when enough people spread the word, stand defiantly against these N.W.O. filth that call themselves human beings and finally stop them. I’m just not sure that we’re there yet though.
Proving a “conspiracy” or cover up is the zenith of any researchers work. In my early days, I remember getting really excited when I managed to obtain the PDF minutes of over half a dozen or so Bilderberg Group meetings. I also remember how disappointed I was when I naively thought I could get the detailed minutes for every meeting there had ever been! It was rewarding though, that I had managed to prove its existence to myself and consequently opened up other roads of research.
With The Agenda it is much harder. I sometimes wish there was a file I could present to people that has “Top Secret” across the top and has a detailed confession of intent signed by the perpetrators. I am convinced The Agenda exists (you can see the ramifications all around us every day through political, military and commercial conduct) although I think that stating the intentions and timetable of it, does the “Truth” cause an injustice. It also opens the door for articles like the one I referred to a few paragraphs back. Because it didn’t play out as we insisted, were we were wrong?… Actually, how can anybody know it’s over or never existed if we never knew what the sequence of events were to begin with?! You also have to bare in mind that those who perpetrate the agenda are not all on the same page. Perhaps their ultimate goal is the same, but their methods sometimes differ.
The shifting of the ground in the last few weeks and months has thrown a curveball at our perceptions of this agenda. An example would be the curious chain of events regarding the International Monetary Fund (IMF) & The World Bank, which many believe to be one of the main weapons in the creation of the N.W.O. It develops with the arrest of IMF director Dominique Strauss Kahn (DSK) on sexual assault charges. DSK was believed to making plans to run against Nicolas Sarkozy in the next French presidential elections. It was also believed that DSK sought to replace the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency with a de facto IMFUN financial tool commonly known as special drawing rights (SDRs), a plan which China fully endorsed in 2009.
Here's a section from an article by Victor Thorn called: “Was Arrest of Top IMF Bankster Part of Planned Sting Operation?":
“To show his resolve, DSK pulled the trigger on Feb. 10 via an IMF report that specifically mentioned the introduction of this supranational one-world currency that challenged the dollar’s dominance. CNN’s website reported the matter, as did other sources. Back in January, DSK appeared on BBC Radio to speak of his plans for a global central bank. He boasted, “Never in the past has an institution like the IMF been as necessary as it has been today. . . . Now is the time to do it, and I think we’re ready to do it.””
To muddy the waters more so, DSK was a close friend of Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou. It is well documented that Greece has received substantial financial bailouts from the IMF (via The EU) which has failed to secure its economy. If DSK had remained in his position, it is possible the following could have occurred: Yet more bailout would be issued unsuccessfully, the US economy could have collapsed immediately and permanently, the Petro-Dollar system for trade in Oil could have collapsed and China would almost certainly become the largest economy in the world. DSK was charged with allegations though and removed from his position awaiting trial.
This week, we’ve had an E.Coli outbreak in Europe. Ignoring the oddness that this strain is resistant to over 8 types of antibiotics (unheard of before with E.Coli), Germany and France immediately blamed Spain for the outbreak, which has had a devastating effect on their already faltering economy. Coincidence abound, Spain was also due an IMF bailout any day. The true source of the outbreak (in Germany, I believe) has been revealed and an apology issued to Spain. The damage however has been done. Russia has allegedly decided not to import European fruit and vegetables for the foreseeable future. In another twist, Spain has also been implicated (allegedly!) in the original financing of Cluster Bombs that have been recently used on civilians in Libya. Cluster Bombs are apparently illegal because the they disperse as mini-mines that can go unexploded for years.
And it continues… Today, Germany has told various countries (those on the IMF bailout list) that they are not doing enough to reduce the deficit. They have blamed early retirement, low working hours, etc., for the economic woes (blaming the masses again!). They have also told them that they probably won’t get further bailouts and that they should consider abandoning the Euro and reverting to their former currencies! Spain and Greece have been considering this for weeks now. Indeed, 60,000 Greek protesters gathered in Syntagma Square in Athens in the last few days to voice their concerned about the economic situation.
All this pales into the background if you consider that money isn’t really real anyway! The paper currency we use is just a usuary note based on the gold reserves that a country continuously re-loans out to all and sundry. In fact, it’s not really even that! It’s just a data transaction… But I digress into a subject for a later date! If you want learn more about the way Global Economics work, I suggest checking out Max Keiser of The Keiser Report on RT news.
So what does all this mean? If the endgame needs all countries to lose their sovereignty, this can be achieved either through unified states (countries are totally dependent on each other to survive) OR economic isolation (countries have nowhere to turn for support). With this in mind, the collapse of economies becomes irrelevant next to the bigger picture. The individual that wrote the article I referred to much earlier in this post, pointed out that single currencies and unified countries across one continent was all part of the New World Order plan… with total globalisation and control of the world populace as the ultimate goal.
Well the second part (I believe) is true. But I’m not sure whether one thing was mean’t to lead inexorably into the other… this was only assumed! Who is to say what the short term strategy is? Was the plan delayed or derailed at some point? This is why I refer to it as The Agenda.. Remember, it is flexible and subject to change. Regardless of the current shape of nations and economies, the road to the end was always mean’t to include: increased fear, anxiety, chaos, upheaval, uncertainty, ignorance and desperation… All in order to make us more grateful and compliant when the inevitable arrives. We’ll welcome it as our saviour with open arms! Will we S**t!! If that happens, I’m going out the same way I came into this world: kicking and screaming!
I think what we’re seeing now is a shifting of the pieces… a transition into the next phase. We need to be mindful that even if we don’t know the shape of things to come, we must be ready. I always say this again and again, but it’s the best advice I can give anyone: Learn your stuff, be aware and spread the word. Your perception is your greatest weapon. Use it to shine a light of truth in those dark corners where lies and deceit make their abode. Use it to expose the rest that sits in plain sight... the stuff that we see, but others maybe don't.
I’ll leave you with some gems from a truly wonderful human being (I say, as I try not to swallow my own tongue!). These are the words of the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski:
“The whole world has become politically awakened” the people are becoming "consciously aware of global inequities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation.”
"Mankind is now politically awakened and stirring” which “makes it a much more difficult context for any major power, including currently the leading world powers.”
Let’s show him what we can do, eh?!
Till Next Time…
Peace & Long Life!
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
