2015: Re-shaping The Future

Welcome to 2015! If Hollywood is to be believed (specifically the film “Back to the Future – Part 2”), this is the year that we should all be wearing self-lacing shoes, self-drying jackets and our pants inside out! More interestingly, the film also suggested that everybody would have access to a whole wealth of advanced technology such as: anti-gravity vehicles, incredibly accurate weather prediction (possibly weather modification), and free energy (certainly in the form of Mr Fusion!) If we adhere to the doctrines and dogmas of the mainstream scientific “P.R.” machine (and, by extension, the façade of perception managed/socially engineered everyday “life”), then very little that was predicted in the film has come to pass. Some people will point out the accuracy of the communication and entertainment based technology (such as large plasma screen TVs on every wall of our homes) in the film, but the similarities seemingly end there. I find it curious that the perceived “great leaps and bounds” of technological innovation during the last several decades have been largely entertainment (or should I say “distraction”) based. To understand the implications of this, you need look no further than the machinations of social engineering outfits like The Tavistock Institute and the designs espoused in the works of writers like Tavistock futurist Aldous Huxley – specifically his novel “Brave New World”.


The reality of existence is that most things are allusion and illusion, designed to misinform our sense of certainty and distort our sense of normalcy. Films like the “Back to the Future” trilogy act like a proverbial “double blind”. The technology that really does exist in the world is well beyond that which we perceive to exist and probably beyond those imagined in the world of Hollywood. Those of us who try to stay informed with alternative forms of knowledge know this to be true. I personally began to glean a little understanding of this subject when I became aware of the life and works of scientific pioneer Nikola Tesla about 20 years ago. He, for me, is one of several touchstones of research into the free energy subject. Over the years since, I have learned that those points of reference were only the beginning of my journey down the proverbial “rabbit hole” of research – particularly upon discovering the research of John Hutchison and Dr. Judy Wood’s ground-breaking book “Where Did the Towers Go?” (See: http://www.drjudywood.com/ ) The term “free energy” is something of a misnomer these days as it is often used to obscure the true implications of the subject – particularly when it comes to investigating the use of directed free-energy technology on 9/11. In any case, these technologies do exist. Never doubt that they do. Their existence has been protected and hidden from the prying eyes of the majority of humanity for a long time. In the spirit of 2015 and looking to the future, I would suggest that people take up the challenge of informing themselves of the reality of this subject. Andrew Johnson has used a wonderful phrase to some up this subject: “Infinite Energy – But not for the Masses.”  (See: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=314&Itemid=55 )


It is time for this paradigm to change, so that the shape of everybody’s future can be remoulded for the better.


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

The Climate of Fear & 9/11 - Exposing the Greatest Cover-Up

With the imminent arrival of the thirteenth anniversary of 9/11, the public has once again been exposed to the manufactured “climate of fear” paradigm. Such a phenomenon has perhaps always existed throughout history and has been an effective tool for the powers that be to control the unwitting masses. The phenomenon has come into sharper focus over the last hundred or so years, thanks largely to the social engineering experiments of outfits such as The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. In the early decades of the twentieth century, the Institute’s study of “retrogressive psychology” [1] allowed the global agenda players to take advantage of many aspects of the human psychology; notably creating a kind of “crisis strategy” or “shock doctrine” [2] with which to manipulate and manage mass perceptions and emotions. One example in particular was the Institute’s extensive studies of post-traumatic stress caused by the bombings of Germany and Japan during WWII – via the Strategic Bombing Survey. [3]

Many significant social engineers had substantial connections to The Tavistock Institute. Edward Bernays encouraged mass irrationality by tapping into the deepest of human fears, for the benefit of the ruling elite. He called it “guiding from above.” Another, Walter Lippmann, is often credited with being one of the first to categorize the paranoid fear of nuclear destruction that became associated with the proverbial “Cold War”.

In the BBC documentary “The Power of Nightmares” [4], Adam Curtis examined how the threat of the Soviet Union was greatly exaggerated by the US elite in order to manipulate and control the perceptions and emotions of the masses. Elements of the US Neo-Conservative political cabal began perpetuating the notion that the USSR’s military capability was growing rapidly. Neo-Conservative heavyweight Donald Rumsfeld managed to convince US President Gerald Ford to set up an “independent” inquiry (called “Team B”) to prove that the Soviets intended an imminent nuclear strike against the US. However, the inquiry was far from “independent” – one member was fellow Neo-Con Paul Wolfowitz, whilst the chairman (Professor Richard Pipes) was a staunch critic of the Soviets. Additionally, the CIA had been watching the Soviets for some time and concluded that there was no truth to the inquiries claims. Team B actually examined all of the CIA’s data and found little evidence of a threat. Despite this, the inquiry claimed that the threat was very real and even argued that Soviet weapons systems were so advanced that they “defied detection”! They even fabricated evidence to support these conclusions.

On the basis of Team B’s “findings”, public information films were made to vilify the Soviets and raise the global profile of the US. The campaign was a whirlwind of propaganda and psychological manipulation. A “grand vision” for America’s future was established, with the intention of bolstering national pride and creating a sense of purpose amongst US citizens. The psychological precepts of mythology and fairy tales were utilised – having been recognised as an effective model for reshaping cultural preconceptions. A world of certainty was crafted, with clearly defined parameters establishing who the “good guys” were, who were “bad”, and how dire the circumstances would be if the “bad guys” ever gained the proverbial upper-hand. Ironically, years later, it was discovered that the CIA’s intelligence had been less than solidly reliable regarding Soviet capabilities. However, as this was not known at the time, it had no bearing on the enquiry’s conclusions or the subsequent psyop that ultimately engulfed much of the Western World.

 

Such scenarios have repeatedly surfaced in subsequent decades. The central mechanism of perception management in these scenarios is the mainstream news media. The media often  features “special reports” (known in the industry as “over the horizon” pieces) which present various “doomsday” scenarios such as asteroid collisions, alien invasions, solar flares, “climate change”, economic collapse, etc. These pieces often come with the addendum that mankind is on the brink of the proverbial abyss. We are told how society will (under such circumstances) probably be plunged into the Dark Ages, gangs of looters will stalk the streets, food and water will become scarce, the skies will darken and so on! The traumatic effect upon the viewer often undermines the ability to stand back and examine the issues in a critical, objective and unbiased manner. The scenarios presented are often cemented in our psyche as “inevitable certainties”.

The reason this occurs lies with the level of “legitimacy” that we apply to the information given to us. If we have no way of judging the accuracy of the information, our cognitive processes fall back upon the level of trust we have in the “apparent” source of the information. The level of trust determines the value of the information - and every subsequent source of information that is connected to the subject. This psychological process (when we do not know the original source or accuracy of a piece of information, but “trust” those who relate it to us – i.e.: the mainstream news, etc.) is called “source amnesia”. [5]

Mass conveyance of a manufactured or exaggerated concept can also saturate public consciousness to the point where we (the masses) will determine the degree of its inevitability. This is largely perpetuated by nothing more than a mass naïve trust in those who first conveyed the information or a collective herd mentality. It has happened time and time again in recent history. Notable examples include the aforementioned “The Cold War”, “Population Growth”, “Climate Change”, and the “War on Terror”.

As the 1990s drew to a close, the storm clouds of the Neo-Con cabal once again loomed on the horizon. In 1997, these individuals formed a Washington think-tank called the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). The work of this group was published in a document called "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" in September 2000. PNAC was effectively charged with creating a blueprint document outlining an aggressive military plan for the US during the coming years. This would be accomplished by the waging of "multiple simultaneous large-scale wars.” [6] The report singled out a number of countries that were in the American military's cross-hares:

"According to the CIA, a number of regimes are deeply hostile to America - North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Libya and Syria." [7]

The report concluded that:

"The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." [8]

Pearl Harbor was a false-flag event that swayed public opinion into supporting America’s entry in WWII. On September 11, 2001, exactly one year after “Rebuilding America's Defenses”, the world was delivered the promised “New Pearl Harbor”. In the decade that followed, the West would wage war against Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, and attempt to do the same with Iran, North Korea and Syria. It seemed that the folk from PNAC had a staggering ability to predict the future. Even more bizarrely, just a few months later, these individuals would end up literally running America.

The stage was set for one of the most elaborate and contrived perception management operations ever conceived. Since then, we (the masses) have been repeatedly exposed to the “climate of fear” paradigm. Not a day has gone by when the news media haven’t talked about extremist nutters making bombs and planning terrorist atrocities, vague amorphous armies, organisations and psychopathic dictators plotting the downfall of the Western world, civilian passenger planes being hijacked, blown up or shot down by various parties (more recently associated with our old “Cold War adversaries”.) Throw into this mix a few stories about out of control viruses and epidemics, social unrest, technology gone mad, and you might well feel that there really was a lot to be afraid of.

Of course, such a reaction is the desired intention of the orchestrated “climate of fear” paradigm. Many people look toward the news media and our “leaders” for reassurance and answers and ultimately end up feeling even more confused and uncertain. Notably, one key figure in the last fifty or so years of US politics (Zbigniew Brzezinski) once openly admitted that said mechanisms are a key part of the contemporary “War on Terror” paradigm.


“The vagueness of the phrase was deliberately (or instinctively) calculated by its sponsors. Constant reference to a "war on terror" did accomplish one major objective: It stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear. Fear obscures reason, intensifies emotions and makes it easier for demagogic politicians to mobilize the public on behalf of the policies they want to pursue.” [9]

At certain times during the year, the “climate of fear” mechanism kicks into overdrive. Recently, we have heard about new (potential large scale) military campaigns in Iraq and Syria. Russia has also been touted as a new (or old) bogeyman – once again bringing echoes of the fear driven days of the Cold War to mind. We’ve even been taunted by a potential Ebola pandemic on the horizon. There is one thing that these recent doom-mongering scenarios all have in common. Their timing coincides with the forthcoming anniversary of 9/11. Despite the fact that so many of these scenarios have their roots in 9/11, it is amazing how few people remember the catalyst. Perhaps this is testament to the effectiveness of perception management – particularly in the mainstream media.

Perhaps the greatest cover-up in living history is the one that was perpetuated in the wake of the events of September 11, 2001. The events of that day seemed almost “hyper-real” and could easily have occurred in the plot of some hokey political thriller novel, film or TV show. Within a few years of 9/11, I became aware of certain oddities – such as pre-9/11 insider trading that benefited those who had premises in and surrounding the World Trade Centre complex and the airline companies whose planes were allegedly “hijacked” on the day. I was also highly suspicious about the lack of disproportionate damage and confiscated surveillance camera footage during the events at The Pentagon. Additionally, there were any number of anomalies surrounding the destruction of the WTC7 building – particularly the BBC’s reporting of its destruction well in advance of the actual event. As for the destruction of the towers themselves, it was clear that there was something wrong with the official story.

Several years later, I became aware of two volumes of research that presented the most complete evidence of a cover-up on 9/11. Dr. Judy Wood (B.S. in Civil Engineering, M.S. in Engineering Mechanics / Applied Physics, and Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science.) spent several years assembling a huge body of work - showing how evidence of directed free-energy technology was apparently utilised on that day in New York. Crucially, the evidence is such that it can be quantifiably measured and can be found in her landmark book “Where Did the Towers Go? – The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11”. [10]

Dr Wood’s work examines multiple pieces of evidence – here are a few key facts that I believe are the most compelling:
•The disproportionately small seismic readings measured as the WTC was destroyed.
•The lack of the distinctive S (known as “Secondary” or “Shear”) and P (“Primary” or “Push-Pull”) wave in the seismic readings.
•Sizeable fluctuations in the Earth’s magnetic field at the time of the “plane impacts” and the destruction of the WTC.
•The rate, speed and nature of the destruction of the WTC.
•“Weird Fires” documented in the vicinity of the WTC.
•The lack of an appropriate amount of debris following the destruction of the WTC.
•The relatively undamaged sub-basement areas of the WTC and the “Bathtub Wall” - that prevents the Hudson River from flooding this area of Manhattan.
•The bizarre behaviour (and almost non-existent reporting) of Hurricane Erin that was due to make landfall in New York on the morning of 9/11.

The second book is Andrew Johnson’s book “9/11 – Finding the Truth”. [11] Not only does his book examine the evidence featured in Dr. Wood’s work, but it also exposes several key organisers within the so-called “9/11 Truth Movement” who have deliberately attacked Dr. Wood’s work and character. These same people have tried to obscure the larger implications of the reality of the directed free-energy technology which was employed in the destruction of the WTC complex.

These books / collections of evidence tell us what really happened to the World Trade Centre complex on 9/11 – a true and verifiable account, quite unlike what mainstream outlets presented to us. Currently, in my opinion, it is difficult to definitively say exactly who planned and perpetrated the destruction seen on 9/11. Similarly, the reasons why it was done and why it involved certain targets is also unclear. This prevents many people, even those who disbelieve the official fable, from investigating the available evidence. That is, they cannot see a reason for a cover up, or the promulgation of a “false conspiracy”, so they don’t even look.

What we can know (from studying the evidence) is that the story of four hijacked airliners, two of which “crashed” into the twin towers of the World Trade Centre and subsequently resulted in their “collapse” is nothing more than a hugely elaborate smokescreen. When studying the evidence collected by Dr. Wood, it becomes clear that an advanced weapons technology was used. This proves that the science and technology available to the agenda players is far in advance of the publicly-perceived level of such technology. 
 

Studying 9/11 in depth allows us to observe the larger global agenda mechanisms at work. Put simply, the greater lie precedes a truth which has been hidden. The 9/11 smokescreen has been successfully “wafted” across governments and into political leaders, military forces and intelligence agencies, the mainstream news and entertainment media industry, and so on. Given the scale of this lie, there will always be people who believe that those in the media and elsewhere, who helped perpetuate the lies, are complicit in hiding the “who did it” and “why they did it”… One can then suggest that senior figures in media organisations must know the “who did it” and the “why they did it”.

Sceptics and disbelievers imply that a cover up of the scale of that necessary to keep all the evidence secret would be so big that it would involve thousands or millions of people and so the cover up could not exist. However, the cover up works because the vast majority of people have a belief in the lie and an apathy or ignorance of the truth. It doesn’t take a psychologist to realise that “the greater the lie, the more people are willing to believe in it”. Continual and widespread repetition of a lie can go a long way – something the mainstream media has down to a fine art! Think about it. Can you accurately recall your gut instinct of 9/11 when you initially became aware of it? How did you find out? I suspect that most people would have been told, “Oh, terrorists hijacked a plane and flew it into the tower.” The media told the world this lie within moments of the first “plane impact”. How would they have known - that Islamic extremists had commandeered airliners – almost instantaneously… how could anybody know with such “certainty”, for that matter!?

The 9/11 cover-up demonstrates the reach and power of the agenda players. They can “snuff out” huge numbers of people without “batting an eyelid”. It is a frightening realisation and underlines how the 9/11 lie (in and of itself) has been an effective deterrent to anybody who dares to question the truth. I have witnessed the power of the 9/11 lie first-hand. I know of many open-minded people who will quite happily entertain the notions of extra-terrestrial life, mind control technology, secret societies and occult conspiracies, and so on. Yet, when the subject of 9/11 comes up (particularly the connection to directed free-energy), they seemingly shut down all critical thinking and see nothing more than the lie – even when presented with compelling and quantifiable evidence. Why is this?

The 9/11 continues today. Not only has history been completely falsified in keeping with the lie, not only has it fuelled the many excuses that the powers that be continually use to justify the reasons for psychological manipulation and perception management of the masses, but it also continues amongst the ranks of certain groups and individuals who “claim” to be fighting to “expose the truth” about what happened on 9/11. An article posted by Andrew Johnson in February 2014 (entitled “9/11 and Cold Fusion – a Possible Attempt to Rewrite History?”) evidentially examines the continuing nature of the latter phenomenon. I have also reposted the article here on this website and included the links to both in the footnotes of this article. [12]

There are many people – for all manner of reasons – who would quite happily consign 9/11 to a closed page of the history books.  We are often told that to keep the subject alive in the public consciousness is disrespectful to the memory of the victims, that it fuels the fires of extremism throughout the world, that there are no real answers to be found and that the events were as “officially” accounted. These are convenient notions (and in some cases outright lies) designed to keep people from seeing the truth. It should always be our obligation to ask questions and expose lies wherever they exist.  If nothing else, we owe it to ourselves, to our loved ones, to all of our fellow human beings, to always seek out the truth.
If those who perpetuate lies and cover ups had their way, each and every one of us would be mindless automatons – born into servitude, both living and dying the same way. Our freedom lies with our ability to question and examine our “reality”.


If we bury our heads in ignorance, then there really is little hope.
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.

[1] An incredible amount of detailed information on this subject can be found here: http://www.moderntimesworkplace.com/archives/archives.html The Material relates to Tavistock pioneer Eric L. Trist – notably: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations Foundation (History, Research and Publications 1941 – 1989), "The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology" - Volume I - The Socio-Psychological Perspective, Volume II - The Socio-Technical Systems Perspective, & Volume III - The Socio-Ecological Perspective. See also: Dr. John Coleman, "Conspirators' Hierarchy - The Story of The Committee of 300", 1992 - http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_00.htm#menu
[2] Naomi Klein has written an interesting book on this related subject called “The Shock Doctrine” – Knopf Canada, 2007, ISBN 978-0676978001
[3] See: Tavistock Institute Quotes - http://www.whale.to/b/tavistock_q.html
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Nightmares See also: https://archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares-Episode1BabyItsColdOutside
[5] The “academic” perspective is that source amnesia is an “episodic memory disorder” – an affliction rather than a common psychological trait - see: https://www.boundless.com/psychology/definition/source-amnesia/ However, the trait appears to be quite common in human behaviour, at least on a superficial and generic level.
[6] "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century", September 2000 (pg. 6 / pdf version: pg. 18) http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
[7] Ibid. (Pg. 51 - 52 / pdf version: pg. 64 - 65) Iraq is heavily emphasised, being referenced 24 times in the reports seventy-odd pages (ninety pages in the pdf version).
[8] Ibid. (Pg. 51 / pdf version: pg. 63)
[9] Zbigniew Brzezinski, "Terrorized by 'War on Terror'", The Washington Post, March 25, 2007 - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/23/AR2007032301613.html
[10] Dr Judy Wood’s website: http://www.drjudywood.com/ See also: Dr. Judy Wood, “Where Did The Towers Go? – The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11” - http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/
[11] Andrew Johnson, “9-11 – Finding the Truth” - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=238&Itemid=60 His thoroughly extensive research (on a variety of subjects) can found at the website: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/

[12] Andrew Johnson, “9/11 and Cold Fusion – a Possible Attempt to Rewrite History?” (03 Feb 2014) See: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=389&Itemid=60 & http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/911-and-cold-fusion-possible-attempt-to.html


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

75 Years On: The War of the Worlds Psyop - Part 2

No One Would Have Believed…

On October 30th 1938, Orson Welles and a band of radio actors and players took to the airwaves of the Columbia Broadcasting System radio network (CBS) to broadcast a Halloween episode of the radio drama anthology series “The Mercury Theatre on the Air”. The episode was an adaption of H. G. Wells’ “The War of the Worlds”.

The broadcast is now legendary as having had something of a psychological effect upon certain members of the public. According to many sources, a staggering number of people were affected by the show. It has been claimed that many listeners believed that the broadcast was real (to some degree) and began (in various manners) to investigate the veracity of the fantastic claims that Martians really had invaded the Earth.

Over time, it has become clear that there are some contradictions in the numbers of people cited as having reacted in any meaningful manner to the broadcast. Although it is known that an estimated six million Americans listened, stories citing large scale panic and fear seem to have originated from overblown newspaper articles published in the following days and weeks.

“A wave of mass hysteria seized thousands of radio listeners between 8:15 and 9:30 o'clock last night when a broadcast of a dramatization of H. G. Wells' fantasy, "The War of the Worlds," led thousands to believe that an interplanetary conflict had started with invading Martians spreading wide death and destruction in New Jersey and New York. The broadcast, which disrupted households, interrupted religious services, created traffic jams and clogged communications systems, was made by Orson Welles, who as the radio character, "The Shadow," used to give "the creeps" to countless child listeners. This time, at least, a score of adults required medical treatment for shock and hysteria.”
“Radio Listeners in Panic, Taking War Drama as Fact” – New York Times, October 31st, 1938. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WOTW-NYT-headline.jpg

Many of the personal stories recounted by a number of affected listeners became the subject of psychological papers published (on the subject) in subsequent years. The principle source of study came from a report by a group of social scientists, published in a volume entitled “The Invasion from Mars: A Study in the Psychology of Panic” by Hadley Cantril, Hazel Gaudet and Herta Herzog. Although the report claims that "at least a million of them (listeners) were frightened or disturbed", the statistical data utilised is curious. "Much of our information was derived from detailed interviews of 135 persons. Over 100 of these persons were selected because they were known to have been upset by the broadcast!" A dozen or so personal accounts are recalled in the report.

As a scientific study, I find it less than reliable when an analysis uses the collected data of 135 witnesses (100 of which were pre-chosen for their panicked reaction) and draws conclusion citing testimony numbering in the thousands or millions. It may well be the case that a larger number of people did experience fear and panic, but did they really react in such an extreme and large-scale manner? More substantive evidence, more than a study of 135 people, would clearly be required to form such a conclusion.

History quietly glosses over the fact that the CBS broadcast was far more than a mere artistic endeavour. At the time, a crisis of looming war was brewing in Europe and it was increasingly questioned what role America would play if the crisis escalated to a global affair. All arms of the media were gradually co-opted as a “war propaganda” machine (something which has historically always been the case in wartime), so the nature of CBS (with its documented historical association to the military industrial complex) should have, at the very least, raised a few eyebrows.

This is also interesting given that part of Hadley Cantril’s study concluded that many listeners did not think that the broadcast portrayed an invasion from Mars, but rather an invasion by the Germans.

The study may have had a much broader significance in relation to other issues – also subject to the machinations of perception management. Curiously, the psychological study produced by Hadley Cantril was cited in The Brookings Institute Report (more accurately known as “Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs”), submitted to the Committee on Science and Astronautics of the United States House of Representatives on April 18th, 1961.

The section "Implications of a discovery of extra-terrestrial life" is now infamous and considered by many as an “admission” of the existence of extra-terrestrial life. The section also proposed possible scenarios for such a discovery and the larger social implications. The report also questions how leadership should handle information and under what circumstances leaders might or might not find it advisable to withhold such information from the public. Whilst the report makes no real mention of the role that the entertainment media may play in such a scenario, page 226 (note 37) makes a peculiar reference to Cantril’s study as a “useful” guide in dealing with the social implications.

Those involved with the Brookings Report (at least at the upper levels) would almost certainly have known of the players involved with the “The War of the Worlds” psyop, so why did they recommend Cantril’s report specifically? I will leave you to decide the implications of why this study alone was cited in the report.

Those ultimately behind the inception of the Halloween broadcast paint an even clearer agenda picture. The Radio Research Project (R.R.P.) was a social research project funded by the Rockefeller Foundation to look into the effects of mass media on society. Whilst it has always been acknowledged officially that R.R.P. studied the broadcast in the following decade, it is now well-known that the radio play was instigated at the behest of R.R.P. and the elite Rockefeller family.

The Rockefeller Foundation began funding the Radio Research Project in 1937 “to find the effects of new forms of mass media on society, especially radio. Several universities joined up and a headquarters was formed at the School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Research_Project

Those involved include the aforementioned Hadley Cantril (then a psychologist at Princeton University's Department of Psychology), Paul Lazarsfeld (Director of the Radio Project), Theodor Adorno (Chief of the Music Division), Gordon W. Allport (another of Lazarsfeld's assistants) and Frank Stanton (then a researcher from CBS sent to help the project.)
The individuals involved had a staggering degree of direct involvement with the elite and the principles of global governance.

Allport was a pioneering psychologist, instrumental in establishing the ‘values scale’ system – a key component in the burgeoning field of public relations. Crucially, Allport went on to be the Tavistock Institute's leading representative in the United States.

Theodore Adorno was also an associate of the Tavistock Institute. His name crops up a fair bit in alternative research, due to his huge role in the explosion of the youth culture and the pop music scene in the early 1960s. Dr John Coleman has written at length about “The Aquarian Conspiracy" – “a living organism which sprang from ‘The Changing Images of Man’ report prepared by Stanford Research Institute.”
(URH (489)-2150-Policy Research Report No. 4/4/74. Policy Report prepared by SRI Centre for the study of Social Policy, directed by Professor Willis Harmon.)

Coleman asserts (perhaps controversially in some eyes!) that Adorno allegedly worked with the Tavistock Institute to modify a 12-atonal musical notation system consisting of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken from the music of the cult of Dionysus and the Baal priesthood. Coleman even asserts that, “Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like the Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the ‘music’.” It is worth taking the time to research this subject, if you haven’t already. However, I will leave you to draw your own conclusions…
Dr. John Coleman, “Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300”, pg.58

Frank Stanton, a member of the hugely agenda-driven Council on Foreign Relationships (CFR), was former executive of CBS broadcasting. He became head of the CBS News Division and eventually president of the network. He was also chairman of the board of The RAND Corporation. RAND has a detailed historical association with global governance and the military industrial complex – notably, also, with psychological warfare and mind control research.

Hadley Cantril was an active and influential member of the Council on Foreign Relations. In 1939, he established the Office of Public Opinion Research (OPOR) at Princeton. OPOR conducted analysis of the effectiveness of “psycho-political operations” (psyops/propaganda) of the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) – the forerunner of the CIA.

His wartime work with The Rockefeller Foundation and (CFR member and CBS reporter) Edward R Murrow helped to establish the Princeton Listening Centre in order to study Nazi radio propaganda and how to apply such techniques to OSS propaganda. Out of the Listening Centre came a new government agency: The Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service” (FBIS), which eventually became the US Information Agency (USIA). USIA was a propaganda arm of the National Security Council.
http://www.mackwhite.com/tv.html

In the final part of this blog series, I will look at the significance of Rockefeller involvement in the “War of the Worlds” psyop and connect some of the dots with the broader scope of global agendas.

To be concluded…

http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/75-years-on-war-of-worlds-psyop-part-1.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/75-years-on-war-of-worlds-psyop-part-2.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/75-years-on-war-of-worlds-psyop-part-3.html


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

75 Years On: The War of the Worlds Psyop - Part 1

Some of my regular readers may be wondering where I have been of late. The truth is that I’ve been hunkered down, furiously writing my first book. The book encompasses themes that I have regularly visited here at The Truth Seeker’s Guide – namely the occasions where aspects of the science fiction genre have crossed paths with the broader canvas of cover-ups, elite shenanigans and global agendas. Whilst researching this subject, I have uncovered some mind-boggling stories from the last hundred or so years, that evidentially places a sizeable number of science fiction luminaries close to the heart of global governance.

Although I am making good progress with the book and can see the end in sight, I’m not there yet! However, this month has presented me with an opportunity to post some of the material from a chapter of the book (which I have split into several parts), which delves into one of the most bizarre broadcasting events of the twentieth century. October 30th 2013 marks the 75th anniversary of the airing of Orson Welles’ “The War of the Worlds” radio play.

This blog series looks at the broadcast itself and some of those individuals connected behind the scenes (individuals associated with larger global agendas), as well as some of the implications and broader legacy of the broadcast.
 
Part One - The War and the Wells
It is generally considered that the mainstream media “psyop” phenomenon (a psychological operation – designed to steer and manage the perceptions of the masses) is predominantly perpetuated by news and current affairs programming. However, one of the earliest examples from the mainstream media does not pertain to an earthly tale of foreign powers or political intrigue; rather it is, perhaps unbelievably, a story about a Martian invasion of Earth that sets the stage! I refer here to the infamous broadcast of “The War of the Worlds” on October 30th 1938.

I will examine some of the finer details of this broadcast in part two of this blog series. Here, I will look at the man behind the origin of this particular story. In 1898, H. G. Wells published “The War of the Worlds”. The novel was one of the earliest science fiction stories to detail a conflict between mankind and an extra-terrestrial race. The novel is one of the most commented-on works in science fiction. To this day, it has never gone out of print. There have been numerous adaptions including several big screen versions, television films and serials, plays and even a musical.

Herbert George Wells’ contributions to the science fiction genre (particularly “The Time Machine” and the aforementioned “The War of the Worlds”) scarcely hid his political and social observations. Although not the first, Wells was a pioneer in galvanising the futurist concept of the Utopian/Dystopian paradigm. Most importantly, Wells played a widespread role in the agenda of global governance.

Wells also understood many scientific principles. In 1884, “Wells won a scholarship to the Normal School of Science (later the Royal College of Science in South Kensington, now part of Imperial College) in London, studying biology under Thomas Henry Huxley. As an alumnus, he later helped to set up the Royal College of Science Association, of which he became the first president in 1909.”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells#Teacher

Wells had a passion and enthusiasm for the belief in an elite-orchestrated collective that could administrate the masses and steer global agendas. Although some will argue that his views on this vision were benevolent, orchestrated in the best interests of all mankind; there are some clues to a slightly more obscure perspective.

In “The Time Machine”, he observed the gap between the elite and the masses and described this world as “perfect”. “Once, life and property must have reached almost absolute safety, the rich had been assured of his wealth and comfort, the toiler assured of his life and work. No doubt in that perfect world there had been no unemployed problem, no social question left unsolved.”

Wells is often cited amongst alternative researchers, due to his authorship of the 1940 piece, “The New World Order”. The book contains many hallmarks of global governance and is, in some places, an almost “how to” guide. In the book, Wells wrote: “There will be no day of days when a new world order comes into being. Step by step and here and there it will arrive, and even as it comes into being it will develop fresh perspectives, discover unsuspected problems and go on to new adventures. No man, no group of men will ever be singled out as its father or founder.”
http://www.telelib.com/authors/W/WellsHerbertGeorge/prose/newworldorder/newworldorder012.html

Although some will scoff at the term “New World Order” and the inherent implications, it is revealing that those who occupy the world political stage have referred to the encompassing term on countless occasions. A cursory internet search will find videos where the likes of Ronald Reagan, George Bush (Junior and Senior), Barack Obama, Bill Clinton, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, John Major, and so on, have all used the term in major speeches.

Wells was an avid supporter of eugenics. In 1904 he discussed a survey paper by Francis Galton, co-founder of eugenics, saying: “It is in the sterilisation of failure, and not in the selection of successes for breeding, that the possibility of an improvement of the human stock lies.”
http://galton.org/essays/1900-1911/galton-1904-am-journ-soc-eugenics-scope-aims.html

There are also obvious connection between The Fabian Society and Wells. It is worth taking the time to research The Fabian Society, as this particular entity has played a huge role in shaping the last 120 years of global governance. Wells’ membership is very well documented and his views on socialism, race and eugenics were widely shared amongst earlier members of the society. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._G._Wells#The_Fabian_Society

With this in mind, it is possible that the contemporary “New World Order” model could be (to some degree) Fabian in origin. Indeed, some researchers assert that this is actually the case. In time, Wells allegedly distanced himself from The Fabian Society. Several sources show his increased critical stance toward them due to “a poor understanding of economics and educational reform.”
Margaret Cole (1974), "H. G. Wells and the Fabian Society". In Morris, A. J. Anthony. Edwardian radicalism, 1900–1914: some aspects of British radicalism. London: Routledge. pp. 97–114. ISBN 0-7100-7866-8.

I should also point out that Wells was a member of “The Coefficients” - formed by early Fabians such as Lord Robert Cecil and Bertrand Russell. These “Coefficients” eventually formed into ‘The Round Table”. The Round Table (of which H. G. Wells was also a founding member) was a think tank that gave birth to the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA - which ultimately spawned The Tavistock Institute) and its American cousin, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). For over a hundred years, these organisations have been extensively involved with global governance.
http://modernhistoryproject.org/mhp?Article=FinalWarning&C=5.1

Wells penned the “Declaration of the Rights of Man” for Lord Sankey which was eventually adapted to be the basis of the UN’s “Declaration of Human Rights”. Many researchers have tied the United Nations to various global agendas.
Roger Normand and Saran Zaidi, “Human Rights at the UN - The Political History of Universal Justice”. See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/37003915/Human-Rights-at-the-UN

There is also the claim that he was a high ranking freemason. His writing does contain references to masonry such as his vague parody of the practice in the short story "The Inexperienced Ghost" (“Masonic Lodge of Research, the Quatuor Coronati Lodge 2076”) and the line delivered by the curiously named “Dr Cabal” – explaining his role in creating a “brotherhood of efficiency, the freemasonry of science” in “The Shape of Things to Come”. His 1929 work, “Imperialism and the Open Conspiracy”, probably comes closest to the themes of masonry.  There are, however, no discernible references to Wells amongst “official” masonic literature.

Some claim that, because of the implications, great steps have been taken to remove all references to him within masonry. This may well be the case. However, it does not afford us the luxury of making the assumption without, at least, a touch of quantifiable evidence.

These aspects of Wells, that I have covered here, do not wholly constitute his huge legacy in relation to the global agenda though. Whether by design or by fault, it is perhaps telling that Wells’ “The War of the Worlds” became the chosen narrative with which to frame one of the greatest perception management psyops ever conceived.

To be continued…

http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/75-years-on-war-of-worlds-psyop-part-1.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/75-years-on-war-of-worlds-psyop-part-2.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2013/10/75-years-on-war-of-worlds-psyop-part-3.html


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html