Everything But the Kitchen Synch – Part 1

I'm big on synchronicities, as my recent article "Foxes, Saturn, Kubrick, Doctor Who and The Singularity" (http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/foxes-saturn-kubrick-doctor-who-and.html) will attest! With the additional significance of the upcoming THIRTEENTH (surely significant) anniversary of 9/11, it felt appropriate to repost this article by Matthew Hancock. The article can also be found on Andrew Johnson's website checktheevidence.com - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=399&Itemid=60
Enjoy!



Everything But the Kitchen Synch – Part 1
by Matthew Hancock, 07 Sep 2014

Can You Hear It?

Do you ever get the feeling that the Universe is trying to tell you something?  If so, what do you usually do about it?  Are you the kind of person that shrugs it off (link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkcKQmr7kRc ) or are you the kind of person that acts on it?

For a long time I’ve been somewhere in the middle.  But recent synchronicities have taken things to a new level for me and at this point it’s almost as if I have no choice but to up my game – and I suspect the same goes for many others.  Some people are of course way ahead of me and have been walking the walk for many years, but the rest of us have largely just been talking the talk, at best.  Anyway, the point is that the vast majority of us, myself included, really have to do a much better job.  The future of humanity depends on it.

Part of what I’m attempting here is to pass on the message that the Universe is indeed trying to tell us something, individually and collectively, and that far too many of us have not been responding.  At this stage in the game that is not only unacceptable, it is suicidal – on a global scale.  A quote that I am fond of is worth using here, which comes from the late radio host, author and political activist Bill Cooper [1], who said: “the truth will set you free.  But first it will piss you off.” [2] If my own experience is anything to go by, Cooper could also have added “and depress the hell out of you,” literally, ideally.

The “Chain” of Obedience – Order-Followers Have Always Been The Problem

We are already in a police state in the West, and elsewhere.  And unless we collectively stop what we’re doing, develop a clear and true understanding of what is and has been happening in the world, and put as much effort as humanly possible into correcting the situation, the chains are going to tighten and the entire world is going to become the worst police state in known human history, and we would only have ourselves to blame.  We all know it, deep down.  And as human beings, we can work together and change the situation for the better – we are more than capable of doing that if we choose to make that our goal and to dedicate our lives to achieving it, above all else.

I don’t believe that the Universe wants us to allow a global totalitarian dictatorship into being.  I think the Universe wants us to recognise the nightmare that we have collectively consented to, and to do exactly what needs to be done to remedy this increasingly intolerable reality.  And presumably it has wanted that for a very long time, but for thousands upon thousands of years there has been a dark force controlling this world, using a myriad of methods from an imaginative variety of violence to the propagation of limiting belief systems, from viciously clamping down on any perceived threat to supplying the people with an authorised controlled opposition that tells us exactly what we want to hear but never leaves a dent in the control structure.  Humanity keeps getting derailed from its true calling: to free ourselves – mentally, physically and spiritually – and to end slavery in all its forms, not just the 12 Years A Slave (link 1 - www.imdb.com/title/tt2024544, link 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-Wxqt7qabo) variety that we are always encouraged to believe is the only conceivable variant.

The good news is that the Universe can and will help us if we choose to accept our true calling.  For this reason, one of the limiting belief systems propagated by the control system – i.e. that (an outdated reductionist subset of) science is the new infallible God, with its model of the Universe as a piece of clockwork – would have us believe that such things are impossible, so why even bother?  Such a disabling of the mind and the will is the general purpose of psychological warfare, and it has to be said that the levels of apathy and the lack of critical thinking skills in the general population are a testament to the success enjoyed in recent decades by the kind of creatures that engage in activities such as mass psychological warfare.  Make no mistake; they are winning the war – and it is a real, ongoing war that affects every living being on this planet, as well as the generations to come – which presumably is one of the reasons why they believe they can now get away with the kind of blatantly fake “terrorist” events marketed by the consistently disgraceful news media in recent years, months and days.  Such propagandists in the media are quislings [3], with very few exceptions if any.

Before moving on I think it’s important to briefly clarify that science itself is of course not the problem.  The scientific method is an essential tool in the pursuit of truth, if only it was (or ever possibly could be) used authentically and sincerely in the politicised, control system-backed, authorised mainstream version of science that generally serves those funding the research – and their masters – as opposed to serving humanity, hence the suppression of free energy technology, cures for cancer and other diseases, and more generally any knowledge that could potentially pose a real threat to the control system.

Synchronicity

So now let’s talk about synchronicity.  What is it and why should we care about it?

Synchronicity is basically a meaningful coincidence, or a meaningful event or experience that appears to be coincidental.  But given the idea that everything is connected to everything else, and that at a fundamental level there isn’t really a clear division between one thing and another thing – as the world of quantum physics seems to have confirmed in recent times – then it could be argued that there are no random coincidental events at all because “this magical ether, which enfolds all of us, is always communicating all the other bits of intelligence from everywhere else.  And in fact that intelligence is embedded in this space, in this ether, in this oneness all the time.  So really, synchronicity is an indication that you are becoming very aware of your place in the world, to a profound level.  And when you do that, a nice way to say it is to say that the Universe (or God, if you prefer) can see you.  What this means is that your consciousness has reached a level where it can receive the signals that were always there but you didn’t used to pick up on them.  And now you are doing, what seems to happen is that synchronicities – fortuitous, serendipitous events that have a happy connection to the way you’re thinking at any moment in time – increase.  More and more magical synchronicities pop up all over the place because your consciousness, your radar on top of your head has grown in its sophistication and it’s picking up more and more and more.  And the depth of signal and the fidelity of that signal, the strength of that resonance is also increasing.  So you can interact with the world at a much greater level. …

And the reason synchronicity increases is because you’re also broadcasting a signal.  You’re not just receiving any more; you are now broadcasting.  And you can only do that when your consciousness is at a certain level, which is why, ordinarily, coincidence is very infrequent; because usually we’re caught up in the hubbub of everything, in the turmoil of daily life and we don’t think clearly, we’re not really in a position to receive any signals.  When you work on yourself, when you clarify what you’re doing and who you are, what it’s all about, you begin to purify your consciousness. …  And that’s when we start to broadcast our own signals and the Universe can hear us as well.  And then we have this beautiful thing which we (now) call synchronicity, which is where events in the world take on much more meaning, and the connection and the apparent randomness flip around; randomness decreases and connection increases.” [4]

Synchronicity can obviously manifest in many different ways, depending on what you are thinking about at any given time and what signal you are receiving and/or broadcasting.  In fact, given a mind that has at least partially thrown off its state-sponsored shackles and limiting belief systems (or never accepted them in the first place) there can only be infinite potential, which is handy.  The above description from Neil Kramer would also suggest that a general increase in consciousness, individually and/or collectively, goes hand in hand with an increase in the number of synchronicities that are experienced and, in many cases, an increase in the level of profundity of such experiences.  That has certainly been the case for me, and in my opinion synchronicity is an example of one of the ways in which the Universe can help us, is helping us and will continue to help us raise our consciousness in a continuous, and much-needed, positive feedback loop.


Wise words from AJ – no, not Alexander the Great (link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=044lyBwzZt4)

Before moving on to some examples of the synchronicities I want to highlight, I would like to point out something that Andrew Johnson said in an interview with Deanna Spingola (link to mp3 - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/audio/911/2012-06-07%20Deanna%20Spingola%20-%20Dr%20Eric%20Larsen%20-%20Dr%20Judy%20Wood%20-%20Andrew%20Johnson%20-%20911%20Cover%20Up.mp3, youtube video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4DZkdq9pQM&t=1h41m55s) which I happened to listen to while the idea for this article was developing in my mind.  Andrew Johnson has of course worked closely with Dr. Judy Wood for several years now, in raising awareness of Dr. Wood’s work on the evidence of directed free-energy technology that has already been weaponised and is known to have been used on 9/11, (link - http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/) and in highlighting the mind-boggling, paradigm-shifting, control system-shattering importance of Dr. Wood’s work, and in exposing the cover-up of this information by the second layer of deception collectively known as the “9/11 truth movement”.

Andrew Johnson:  When people discover this information and they begin to process it, it’s almost like fate is choosing them – or they’re choosing it themselves.  I’ve almost stopped writing to people about it now because I’m finding it working better if people contact me and want some further information.  You know, they’ve got to a certain point and just need some clarification or something.  They’ve already begun that process of discovery under their own volition – they haven’t had it forced on them in any way.

But it is very very difficult.  And going back to these groups like Architects and Engineers and all these other groups, they’re designed to get in the way of that process of personal discovery.  In other words, those groups have done the discovery for you, and taken responsibility for it, and then portrayed that in a certain way and re-presented it to the public, rather than somebody starting from zero.

What’s in a Name?

It is interesting to note (for me at least) that in the authorised version of history, often peddled by the mainstream media, we’re told that US president Abraham Lincoln was dedicated to freeing the slaves, whereas in reality he actually said the following (link - http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/greeley.htm): “My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union, and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave I would do it … What I do about slavery, and the colored race, I do because I believe it helps to save the Union; and what I forbear, I forbear because I do not believe it would help to save the Union. I shall do less whenever I shall believe what I am doing hurts the cause, and I shall do more whenever I shall believe doing more will help the cause.”

Lincoln was of course assassinated – in one of a series of bizarre “coincidental” parallels with JFK (link - http://coincidenceandsynchronicity.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/abraham-lincoln-and-john-f-kennedy.html) – and was succeeded by a man called Andrew Johnson.  Similarly, one could argue that the authorised perception of the so-called “9/11 truth movement” is that it is there to free the slaves – albeit more of a mental rather than a physical kind of slavery – whereas in reality the (mis)leaders of said movement are knowingly suppressing the most important information, misrepresenting the facts and generally keeping the followers of the movement in the dark.  For me personally (and a growing number of others) the so-called “9/11 truth movement” was succeeded by a man called Andrew Johnson.

As already mentioned, Johnson has documented many of the shenanigans of the so-called “9/11 truth movement” (link 1 - http://tinyurl.com/911ftb, link 2 - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms//index.php?option=com_content&task=category&sectionid=1&id=1&Itemid=60) as well as highlighting the paradigm-shifting and potentially control system-shattering importance of the work of Dr. Judy Wood. (link - http://drjudywood.com)  I don’t know about you, but what springs to my mind at a time like this is the following question: if all the world’s a stage and all the men and women merely players, then who would play the role of the person that gets behind that curtain and exposes the Wizard of Oz for what he really is?  Well, Judy Wood (BS, MS, PhD) wouldn’t she?

Who Wants Unlimited Free Energy for Humanity, and Who Doesn’t?

I have been aware of Dr. Wood’s work for a few years now, and thanks to Dr. Wood, Andrew Johnson and a few others, I have also recognised the scale of the cover-up of 9/11, not only through the continuously deceitful mainstream media, but also through the majority of the so-called alternative media.  We expect such inauthentic behaviour from the mainstream media – or at least we should do by now – which is populated largely by people who have more or less overtly made a deal with the devil in order to (among other things) secure a more cosmetically pleasing cage, [5] replete with more shiny things than a house slave could ever possibly need.  And from their first class cages they seem to want (or seem to be compelled in some way) to watch the whole world sink further and further into Hell, smug in the knowledge that at least they tried to put those pesky “conspiracy theorists” in their places on the way down.  And they would have gotten away with it too, if it wasn’t for more and more of us getting a Scooby Doo. [6]

But the alternative media is supposed to be, well, alternative, isn’t it?  Well yes, in an ideal world – but not in this one.  This one is run by and for megalomaniacal psychopaths who see the bulk of mankind as an inferior species that exists only to serve them and their psychotic desires, and only for as long as they say we can exist [7].  They see us as their slaves, and collectively we seem to have agreed with them, at least in effect, so far.

If mankind was given unlimited access to free energy it could potentially irreparably damage the control structure and its inherent master-slave dynamic, therefore – from the psychopathic lunatics’ perspective – that must not be allowed to happen, hence the cover-up of real 9/11 truth in the “alternative media” (with a growing number of exceptions) as well as throughout the mainstream media.  That is not to say that every single person who promotes or facilitates the promotion of red herrings such as the provably false theories of bombs or nukes in the Twin Towers and/or thermite (or all the variants thereof) is knowingly lying to the public and consciously participating in one of the most damaging and self-enslaving cover-ups in all of human history.  But some of them definitely are (link 1 – http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/richard-gage-architects-and-engineers-for-911-truth, link 2 - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=350&Itemid=60, link 3 - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=375&Itemid=60, link 4 - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=389&Itemid=60, link 5 - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=397&Itemid=60), and they have been placed into positions from which they could do the most damage, and have done just that.  So let’s not kid ourselves about what we’re really up against here.  Uncomfortable truths must be accepted over comfortable (or less uncomfortable) lies 100% of the time if we are ever going to get out of this mess.

The Right Honourable “Members” of Orwelliana

So in this context of real 9/11 truth and the known existence of free energy technology, step forward Matthew Hancock MP.  My name, the author of this article, happens to be Matthew Hancock.  So imagine my surprise when someone of the same name was in the papers recently (link - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/fracking/10995052/Fracking-Matthew-Hancock-fails-to-name-a-single-village-that-supports-it.html), trying to convince anybody who would listen that hydraulic fracturing a.k.a. “fracking” is a good thing – rather than the insanely dangerous and completely unnecessary attack on the ecosystem that it so obviously is – and that there is “broad support” and people are actually in favour of it.  When pressed he was unable to name a single community for which this is true, but that’s MPs for you.  It is their job to lie to us, to take the rotten tomatoes from the general public in this pathetic, seemingly endless Punch & Judy show for “grown-ups” routine and to serve the aforementioned psychopathic lunatics who actually run things behind the scenes, operating from a level well above party politics.

Now, Matthew Hancock MP is obviously an MP, therefore he is an inherently corrupt individual [8].  As the current energy minister – although the government department is currently called the Department of Energy and Climate Change, as dictated by the higher-ups’ need to institutionalise the laughable concept of man-made global warming, recently re-branded (by necessity) as the far more acceptable, albeit empty term “climate change”:  Has the climate ever not been changing?  Is it even possible for the climate not to be changing?  Can we see through these moronic slogans and sound bites yet?  Yes we can! – as the current energy minister there is no possibility that he has not been vetted for years and, having obviously been approved, there is no possibility that he will carry out any meaningful action that results in the widespread awareness of the existence of free energy technology, let alone the widespread availability of such technology.  Mr. Hancock MP will toe the party line all the way; pretending that the man-made global warming farce hasn’t already been exposed as the Club of Rome-invented scam and lie that it is [9]; insinuating that over-population is the source of all our “energy problems”; talking the talk about “looking at” (politician-speak for “not doing anything about”) the energy cartel and the so-called government’s [10] undeniably telling complicity, typically marketed as well-meaning incompetence, etc. etc.

No, Matthew Hancock MP will not serve the public or attempt to carry out any effective action that could help to bring free energy to humanity.  As an MP that’s simply not his job, certainly not as the energy minister – don’t forget that these are Orwellian times we’re living in; 1984 + 30.  In reality, if we are ever going to bring free energy to humanity the first pre-requisite is to cut out the wilfully obstructive middle man.

I mention Mr. Hancock MP only to note the profound synchronicity, and to speak my mind about the contempt that the powers that shouldn’t be must have for the general public in order to even attempt to palm us off with this insulting version of “democracy”, let alone to keep the same scam going, decade after mind-boggling decade.  Then again, they do say “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it,” do they not?

From the psychopathic perspective, it ain’t broke.  From a normal human perspective, it ain’t even sane.  So let’s do something about it.

I ain't got time for your politics
Or your masqueraded Machiavellian tricks
Goodbye, you know I ain't got time

-- “Why Not Nothing?” by Richard Ashcroft, from the album Keys to the World
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Footnotes
 
1)      Bill Cooper was murdered by the state on November 5, 2001 – within 2 months of 9/11 – having predicted elements of the attack, including the fact that it would be blamed on Osama Bin Laden (link 1 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V5tmogd9xp4, link 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KKT5XxJ1sbQ)
2)      Jesus Christ – whether you perceive him as the literal son of God who died for our sins, as the astrotheological Sun of God, as a spiritually advanced teacher with a message of enlightenment, as an allegorical figure, as a personification of a group of teachers, as nothing more than a fictional character who happens to have had some truthful statements attributed to him, as a combination of some of the above, or as something else entirely –  said “And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free,” (John 8:32) so it’s important to emphasise that the knowledge of the truth is what is required, not merely the existence of the truth.  And of course after the knowledge of the truth, must come action based on the knowledge of that truth, otherwise what was the point in gaining the knowledge?
3)      A quisling is a traitor who serves as a puppet of the enemy occupying his/her country, an uncomfortably useful word which I learned recently from reading Dr. Eric Larsen’s book The Skull of Yorrick: The Emptiness of American Thinking at a Time of Grave Peril – Studies In The Cover-Up Of 9/11.
4)      Neil Kramer on Synchronicity + His Book The Unfoldment - Interviewed by Ted Torbich (link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8z_S1HQjpDE ) Incidentally, Neil Kramer happens to be an anagram of “line marker,” which seems appropriate for someone who “delineates” or describes such things so well.
Here is Neil Kramer’s website - http://neilkramer.com/ There is a lot of excellent material there.  Most of it is freely available and there are also some items for sale.
5)      I do not watch Coronation Street, the longest running soap opera in the world, which the Tavistock Institute was involved with bringing to many millions of TV screens in order to modify behaviour, en masse, by way of TV programming.  But over the years I have occasionally had to sit through some of it when visiting relatives.  I have noticed on more than one occasion the use of the phrase “Who rattled your cage?”, an expression of annoyance at the interference in somebody else’s business, or something similar.  From the perspective of psycholinguistics, this is a fairly blatant suggestion that psychological enslavement and imprisonment is to be accepted as the norm, rather than resisted and overcome.
6)      Cockney rhyming slang: Scooby Doo = clue.
7)      See for example the Georgia Guidestones, which can be seen in the pictures section of Alan Watt’s website (link - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/pictures.html) Anyone unfamiliar with Alan Watt (not to be confused with the late English philosopher Alan Watts) should listen to a few dozen of his “blurbs” - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/radio/Special_Talks_2006.html for one of the best educations on the system in which we live, that money (or no money in this case) can buy.  After that you might want to buy the books - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/books.html
See also the recent gruesome Channel 4 series Utopia - http://www.channel4.com/programmes/utopia/episode-guide in which a plan is hatched to release a deadly virus so that the terrified public would willingly take a particular vaccine, which had been prepared by the sinister and psychopathic “Network”, and would sterilize those who took the vaccine, in the hope of ultimately reducing the global population to 500 million, the very figure under which “humanity” must be maintained according to the Georgia Guidestones. Throughout the TV programme Utopia there is also a persistent mockery of “conspiracy theorists” and people who believe in the easily verifiable facts about the existence of such shadowy and satanic groups.
See also the breathtaking psychopathy of George Bernard Shaw, founding member of the Fabian Society. (Link 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hQvsf2MUKRQ,  Fabian Window - https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjpa0gZxXueeLrzwOTlmYas7EUcsPMRzAdedwqQj7eh5JWvTaqA9KRH53TAYAKsT3z3TS7wPlZK8vaefLb-wZzPxQ-INib9QEbIDN5YbM_9IBIzFsFDTt3WQRLIPHIj8t-ZUWHc0VVEiBSo/s1600/gbs-fabian-stained-glass-window.jpg)
8)      There are people who command an enormous amount of respect, such as Catherine Austin Fitts (link - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWpzBHL4I3I) who argue that there are good, honest, sincere politicians that are exceptions to the rule.  Maybe there are one or two in the USA, and it’s not impossible that there are one or two more in the UK, or maybe even a handful on either side of the Pond, but given the inherent corruption in the entire system in which they are operating, such people cannot hope to achieve much good from within that system.  Either way, Matthew Hancock MP is evidently not one of the exceptions.
Incidentally, as the minister of state for energy, Matthew Hancock MP is under the secretary of state for energy and climate change, a position that is currently held by liar Ed Davey MP.  Davey took over from liar Chris Huhne MP after Huhne was forced to resign “when he was charged with perverting the course of justice over a 2003 speeding case. His then wife had said that she was in the car at the time and thus accepted the licence penalty points on his behalf. Chris Huhne denied the charge until the trial began on 4 February 2013, when he changed his plea to guilty, resigned as a member of parliament and left the Privy Council. He was sentenced to eight months in prison at Southwark Crown Court, along with his former wife Vicky Pryce for the same offence, on 11 March. He served 62 days …” (Link - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Huhne)
The one before that was the current chief liar in opposition Ed Miliband MP. (link - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secretary_of_State_for_Energy_and_Climate_Change)
9)      “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we suggested that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.  In their totality and in their interactions, these phenomena constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples.  But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for causes.  All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome.  The real enemy then is humanity itself.”
King, Alexander and Schneider, Bertrand, The First Global Revolution, p 85.
See also May 30, 2007 Alan Watt Blurb (i.e. Educational Talk)
Crisis Creation by the Club of Rome - Clubbing Us to Death (link to mp3 - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/Blurbs/Alan_Watt_Blurb_CrisisCreationClubOfRome_May302007.mp3 - link to transcript - http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/transcripts/Alan_Watt_Blurb_CrisisCreationClubOfRome_May302007.html)
10)  Government = Mind Control, from the Latin gubernare (to control) and mens (mind). This has been highlighted in several excellent and extremely important presentations by Mark Passio - http://www.whatonearthishappening.com/videos

The Climate of Fear & 9/11 - Exposing the Greatest Cover-Up

With the imminent arrival of the thirteenth anniversary of 9/11, the public has once again been exposed to the manufactured “climate of fear” paradigm. Such a phenomenon has perhaps always existed throughout history and has been an effective tool for the powers that be to control the unwitting masses. The phenomenon has come into sharper focus over the last hundred or so years, thanks largely to the social engineering experiments of outfits such as The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. In the early decades of the twentieth century, the Institute’s study of “retrogressive psychology” [1] allowed the global agenda players to take advantage of many aspects of the human psychology; notably creating a kind of “crisis strategy” or “shock doctrine” [2] with which to manipulate and manage mass perceptions and emotions. One example in particular was the Institute’s extensive studies of post-traumatic stress caused by the bombings of Germany and Japan during WWII – via the Strategic Bombing Survey. [3]

Many significant social engineers had substantial connections to The Tavistock Institute. Edward Bernays encouraged mass irrationality by tapping into the deepest of human fears, for the benefit of the ruling elite. He called it “guiding from above.” Another, Walter Lippmann, is often credited with being one of the first to categorize the paranoid fear of nuclear destruction that became associated with the proverbial “Cold War”.

In the BBC documentary “The Power of Nightmares” [4], Adam Curtis examined how the threat of the Soviet Union was greatly exaggerated by the US elite in order to manipulate and control the perceptions and emotions of the masses. Elements of the US Neo-Conservative political cabal began perpetuating the notion that the USSR’s military capability was growing rapidly. Neo-Conservative heavyweight Donald Rumsfeld managed to convince US President Gerald Ford to set up an “independent” inquiry (called “Team B”) to prove that the Soviets intended an imminent nuclear strike against the US. However, the inquiry was far from “independent” – one member was fellow Neo-Con Paul Wolfowitz, whilst the chairman (Professor Richard Pipes) was a staunch critic of the Soviets. Additionally, the CIA had been watching the Soviets for some time and concluded that there was no truth to the inquiries claims. Team B actually examined all of the CIA’s data and found little evidence of a threat. Despite this, the inquiry claimed that the threat was very real and even argued that Soviet weapons systems were so advanced that they “defied detection”! They even fabricated evidence to support these conclusions.

On the basis of Team B’s “findings”, public information films were made to vilify the Soviets and raise the global profile of the US. The campaign was a whirlwind of propaganda and psychological manipulation. A “grand vision” for America’s future was established, with the intention of bolstering national pride and creating a sense of purpose amongst US citizens. The psychological precepts of mythology and fairy tales were utilised – having been recognised as an effective model for reshaping cultural preconceptions. A world of certainty was crafted, with clearly defined parameters establishing who the “good guys” were, who were “bad”, and how dire the circumstances would be if the “bad guys” ever gained the proverbial upper-hand. Ironically, years later, it was discovered that the CIA’s intelligence had been less than solidly reliable regarding Soviet capabilities. However, as this was not known at the time, it had no bearing on the enquiry’s conclusions or the subsequent psyop that ultimately engulfed much of the Western World.

 

Such scenarios have repeatedly surfaced in subsequent decades. The central mechanism of perception management in these scenarios is the mainstream news media. The media often  features “special reports” (known in the industry as “over the horizon” pieces) which present various “doomsday” scenarios such as asteroid collisions, alien invasions, solar flares, “climate change”, economic collapse, etc. These pieces often come with the addendum that mankind is on the brink of the proverbial abyss. We are told how society will (under such circumstances) probably be plunged into the Dark Ages, gangs of looters will stalk the streets, food and water will become scarce, the skies will darken and so on! The traumatic effect upon the viewer often undermines the ability to stand back and examine the issues in a critical, objective and unbiased manner. The scenarios presented are often cemented in our psyche as “inevitable certainties”.

The reason this occurs lies with the level of “legitimacy” that we apply to the information given to us. If we have no way of judging the accuracy of the information, our cognitive processes fall back upon the level of trust we have in the “apparent” source of the information. The level of trust determines the value of the information - and every subsequent source of information that is connected to the subject. This psychological process (when we do not know the original source or accuracy of a piece of information, but “trust” those who relate it to us – i.e.: the mainstream news, etc.) is called “source amnesia”. [5]

Mass conveyance of a manufactured or exaggerated concept can also saturate public consciousness to the point where we (the masses) will determine the degree of its inevitability. This is largely perpetuated by nothing more than a mass naïve trust in those who first conveyed the information or a collective herd mentality. It has happened time and time again in recent history. Notable examples include the aforementioned “The Cold War”, “Population Growth”, “Climate Change”, and the “War on Terror”.

As the 1990s drew to a close, the storm clouds of the Neo-Con cabal once again loomed on the horizon. In 1997, these individuals formed a Washington think-tank called the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). The work of this group was published in a document called "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" in September 2000. PNAC was effectively charged with creating a blueprint document outlining an aggressive military plan for the US during the coming years. This would be accomplished by the waging of "multiple simultaneous large-scale wars.” [6] The report singled out a number of countries that were in the American military's cross-hares:

"According to the CIA, a number of regimes are deeply hostile to America - North Korea, Iraq, Iran, Libya and Syria." [7]

The report concluded that:

"The process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." [8]

Pearl Harbor was a false-flag event that swayed public opinion into supporting America’s entry in WWII. On September 11, 2001, exactly one year after “Rebuilding America's Defenses”, the world was delivered the promised “New Pearl Harbor”. In the decade that followed, the West would wage war against Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya, and attempt to do the same with Iran, North Korea and Syria. It seemed that the folk from PNAC had a staggering ability to predict the future. Even more bizarrely, just a few months later, these individuals would end up literally running America.

The stage was set for one of the most elaborate and contrived perception management operations ever conceived. Since then, we (the masses) have been repeatedly exposed to the “climate of fear” paradigm. Not a day has gone by when the news media haven’t talked about extremist nutters making bombs and planning terrorist atrocities, vague amorphous armies, organisations and psychopathic dictators plotting the downfall of the Western world, civilian passenger planes being hijacked, blown up or shot down by various parties (more recently associated with our old “Cold War adversaries”.) Throw into this mix a few stories about out of control viruses and epidemics, social unrest, technology gone mad, and you might well feel that there really was a lot to be afraid of.

Of course, such a reaction is the desired intention of the orchestrated “climate of fear” paradigm. Many people look toward the news media and our “leaders” for reassurance and answers and ultimately end up feeling even more confused and uncertain. Notably, one key figure in the last fifty or so years of US politics (Zbigniew Brzezinski) once openly admitted that said mechanisms are a key part of the contemporary “War on Terror” paradigm.


“The vagueness of the phrase was deliberately (or instinctively) calculated by its sponsors. Constant reference to a "war on terror" did accomplish one major objective: It stimulated the emergence of a culture of fear. Fear obscures reason, intensifies emotions and makes it easier for demagogic politicians to mobilize the public on behalf of the policies they want to pursue.” [9]

At certain times during the year, the “climate of fear” mechanism kicks into overdrive. Recently, we have heard about new (potential large scale) military campaigns in Iraq and Syria. Russia has also been touted as a new (or old) bogeyman – once again bringing echoes of the fear driven days of the Cold War to mind. We’ve even been taunted by a potential Ebola pandemic on the horizon. There is one thing that these recent doom-mongering scenarios all have in common. Their timing coincides with the forthcoming anniversary of 9/11. Despite the fact that so many of these scenarios have their roots in 9/11, it is amazing how few people remember the catalyst. Perhaps this is testament to the effectiveness of perception management – particularly in the mainstream media.

Perhaps the greatest cover-up in living history is the one that was perpetuated in the wake of the events of September 11, 2001. The events of that day seemed almost “hyper-real” and could easily have occurred in the plot of some hokey political thriller novel, film or TV show. Within a few years of 9/11, I became aware of certain oddities – such as pre-9/11 insider trading that benefited those who had premises in and surrounding the World Trade Centre complex and the airline companies whose planes were allegedly “hijacked” on the day. I was also highly suspicious about the lack of disproportionate damage and confiscated surveillance camera footage during the events at The Pentagon. Additionally, there were any number of anomalies surrounding the destruction of the WTC7 building – particularly the BBC’s reporting of its destruction well in advance of the actual event. As for the destruction of the towers themselves, it was clear that there was something wrong with the official story.

Several years later, I became aware of two volumes of research that presented the most complete evidence of a cover-up on 9/11. Dr. Judy Wood (B.S. in Civil Engineering, M.S. in Engineering Mechanics / Applied Physics, and Ph.D. in Materials Engineering Science.) spent several years assembling a huge body of work - showing how evidence of directed free-energy technology was apparently utilised on that day in New York. Crucially, the evidence is such that it can be quantifiably measured and can be found in her landmark book “Where Did the Towers Go? – The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11”. [10]

Dr Wood’s work examines multiple pieces of evidence – here are a few key facts that I believe are the most compelling:
•The disproportionately small seismic readings measured as the WTC was destroyed.
•The lack of the distinctive S (known as “Secondary” or “Shear”) and P (“Primary” or “Push-Pull”) wave in the seismic readings.
•Sizeable fluctuations in the Earth’s magnetic field at the time of the “plane impacts” and the destruction of the WTC.
•The rate, speed and nature of the destruction of the WTC.
•“Weird Fires” documented in the vicinity of the WTC.
•The lack of an appropriate amount of debris following the destruction of the WTC.
•The relatively undamaged sub-basement areas of the WTC and the “Bathtub Wall” - that prevents the Hudson River from flooding this area of Manhattan.
•The bizarre behaviour (and almost non-existent reporting) of Hurricane Erin that was due to make landfall in New York on the morning of 9/11.

The second book is Andrew Johnson’s book “9/11 – Finding the Truth”. [11] Not only does his book examine the evidence featured in Dr. Wood’s work, but it also exposes several key organisers within the so-called “9/11 Truth Movement” who have deliberately attacked Dr. Wood’s work and character. These same people have tried to obscure the larger implications of the reality of the directed free-energy technology which was employed in the destruction of the WTC complex.

These books / collections of evidence tell us what really happened to the World Trade Centre complex on 9/11 – a true and verifiable account, quite unlike what mainstream outlets presented to us. Currently, in my opinion, it is difficult to definitively say exactly who planned and perpetrated the destruction seen on 9/11. Similarly, the reasons why it was done and why it involved certain targets is also unclear. This prevents many people, even those who disbelieve the official fable, from investigating the available evidence. That is, they cannot see a reason for a cover up, or the promulgation of a “false conspiracy”, so they don’t even look.

What we can know (from studying the evidence) is that the story of four hijacked airliners, two of which “crashed” into the twin towers of the World Trade Centre and subsequently resulted in their “collapse” is nothing more than a hugely elaborate smokescreen. When studying the evidence collected by Dr. Wood, it becomes clear that an advanced weapons technology was used. This proves that the science and technology available to the agenda players is far in advance of the publicly-perceived level of such technology. 
 

Studying 9/11 in depth allows us to observe the larger global agenda mechanisms at work. Put simply, the greater lie precedes a truth which has been hidden. The 9/11 smokescreen has been successfully “wafted” across governments and into political leaders, military forces and intelligence agencies, the mainstream news and entertainment media industry, and so on. Given the scale of this lie, there will always be people who believe that those in the media and elsewhere, who helped perpetuate the lies, are complicit in hiding the “who did it” and “why they did it”… One can then suggest that senior figures in media organisations must know the “who did it” and the “why they did it”.

Sceptics and disbelievers imply that a cover up of the scale of that necessary to keep all the evidence secret would be so big that it would involve thousands or millions of people and so the cover up could not exist. However, the cover up works because the vast majority of people have a belief in the lie and an apathy or ignorance of the truth. It doesn’t take a psychologist to realise that “the greater the lie, the more people are willing to believe in it”. Continual and widespread repetition of a lie can go a long way – something the mainstream media has down to a fine art! Think about it. Can you accurately recall your gut instinct of 9/11 when you initially became aware of it? How did you find out? I suspect that most people would have been told, “Oh, terrorists hijacked a plane and flew it into the tower.” The media told the world this lie within moments of the first “plane impact”. How would they have known - that Islamic extremists had commandeered airliners – almost instantaneously… how could anybody know with such “certainty”, for that matter!?

The 9/11 cover-up demonstrates the reach and power of the agenda players. They can “snuff out” huge numbers of people without “batting an eyelid”. It is a frightening realisation and underlines how the 9/11 lie (in and of itself) has been an effective deterrent to anybody who dares to question the truth. I have witnessed the power of the 9/11 lie first-hand. I know of many open-minded people who will quite happily entertain the notions of extra-terrestrial life, mind control technology, secret societies and occult conspiracies, and so on. Yet, when the subject of 9/11 comes up (particularly the connection to directed free-energy), they seemingly shut down all critical thinking and see nothing more than the lie – even when presented with compelling and quantifiable evidence. Why is this?

The 9/11 continues today. Not only has history been completely falsified in keeping with the lie, not only has it fuelled the many excuses that the powers that be continually use to justify the reasons for psychological manipulation and perception management of the masses, but it also continues amongst the ranks of certain groups and individuals who “claim” to be fighting to “expose the truth” about what happened on 9/11. An article posted by Andrew Johnson in February 2014 (entitled “9/11 and Cold Fusion – a Possible Attempt to Rewrite History?”) evidentially examines the continuing nature of the latter phenomenon. I have also reposted the article here on this website and included the links to both in the footnotes of this article. [12]

There are many people – for all manner of reasons – who would quite happily consign 9/11 to a closed page of the history books.  We are often told that to keep the subject alive in the public consciousness is disrespectful to the memory of the victims, that it fuels the fires of extremism throughout the world, that there are no real answers to be found and that the events were as “officially” accounted. These are convenient notions (and in some cases outright lies) designed to keep people from seeing the truth. It should always be our obligation to ask questions and expose lies wherever they exist.  If nothing else, we owe it to ourselves, to our loved ones, to all of our fellow human beings, to always seek out the truth.
If those who perpetuate lies and cover ups had their way, each and every one of us would be mindless automatons – born into servitude, both living and dying the same way. Our freedom lies with our ability to question and examine our “reality”.


If we bury our heads in ignorance, then there really is little hope.
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.

[1] An incredible amount of detailed information on this subject can be found here: http://www.moderntimesworkplace.com/archives/archives.html The Material relates to Tavistock pioneer Eric L. Trist – notably: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations Foundation (History, Research and Publications 1941 – 1989), "The Social Engagement of Social Science: A Tavistock Anthology" - Volume I - The Socio-Psychological Perspective, Volume II - The Socio-Technical Systems Perspective, & Volume III - The Socio-Ecological Perspective. See also: Dr. John Coleman, "Conspirators' Hierarchy - The Story of The Committee of 300", 1992 - http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_committee300_00.htm#menu
[2] Naomi Klein has written an interesting book on this related subject called “The Shock Doctrine” – Knopf Canada, 2007, ISBN 978-0676978001
[3] See: Tavistock Institute Quotes - http://www.whale.to/b/tavistock_q.html
[4] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Power_of_Nightmares See also: https://archive.org/details/ThePowerOfNightmares-Episode1BabyItsColdOutside
[5] The “academic” perspective is that source amnesia is an “episodic memory disorder” – an affliction rather than a common psychological trait - see: https://www.boundless.com/psychology/definition/source-amnesia/ However, the trait appears to be quite common in human behaviour, at least on a superficial and generic level.
[6] "Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century", September 2000 (pg. 6 / pdf version: pg. 18) http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/pdf/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf
[7] Ibid. (Pg. 51 - 52 / pdf version: pg. 64 - 65) Iraq is heavily emphasised, being referenced 24 times in the reports seventy-odd pages (ninety pages in the pdf version).
[8] Ibid. (Pg. 51 / pdf version: pg. 63)
[9] Zbigniew Brzezinski, "Terrorized by 'War on Terror'", The Washington Post, March 25, 2007 - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/23/AR2007032301613.html
[10] Dr Judy Wood’s website: http://www.drjudywood.com/ See also: Dr. Judy Wood, “Where Did The Towers Go? – The Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11” - http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/
[11] Andrew Johnson, “9-11 – Finding the Truth” - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=238&Itemid=60 His thoroughly extensive research (on a variety of subjects) can found at the website: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/

[12] Andrew Johnson, “9/11 and Cold Fusion – a Possible Attempt to Rewrite History?” (03 Feb 2014) See: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=389&Itemid=60 & http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/911-and-cold-fusion-possible-attempt-to.html


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html