2015: Re-shaping The Future

Welcome to 2015! If Hollywood is to be believed (specifically the film “Back to the Future – Part 2”), this is the year that we should all be wearing self-lacing shoes, self-drying jackets and our pants inside out! More interestingly, the film also suggested that everybody would have access to a whole wealth of advanced technology such as: anti-gravity vehicles, incredibly accurate weather prediction (possibly weather modification), and free energy (certainly in the form of Mr Fusion!) If we adhere to the doctrines and dogmas of the mainstream scientific “P.R.” machine (and, by extension, the façade of perception managed/socially engineered everyday “life”), then very little that was predicted in the film has come to pass. Some people will point out the accuracy of the communication and entertainment based technology (such as large plasma screen TVs on every wall of our homes) in the film, but the similarities seemingly end there. I find it curious that the perceived “great leaps and bounds” of technological innovation during the last several decades have been largely entertainment (or should I say “distraction”) based. To understand the implications of this, you need look no further than the machinations of social engineering outfits like The Tavistock Institute and the designs espoused in the works of writers like Tavistock futurist Aldous Huxley – specifically his novel “Brave New World”.


The reality of existence is that most things are allusion and illusion, designed to misinform our sense of certainty and distort our sense of normalcy. Films like the “Back to the Future” trilogy act like a proverbial “double blind”. The technology that really does exist in the world is well beyond that which we perceive to exist and probably beyond those imagined in the world of Hollywood. Those of us who try to stay informed with alternative forms of knowledge know this to be true. I personally began to glean a little understanding of this subject when I became aware of the life and works of scientific pioneer Nikola Tesla about 20 years ago. He, for me, is one of several touchstones of research into the free energy subject. Over the years since, I have learned that those points of reference were only the beginning of my journey down the proverbial “rabbit hole” of research – particularly upon discovering the research of John Hutchison and Dr. Judy Wood’s ground-breaking book “Where Did the Towers Go?” (See: http://www.drjudywood.com/ ) The term “free energy” is something of a misnomer these days as it is often used to obscure the true implications of the subject – particularly when it comes to investigating the use of directed free-energy technology on 9/11. In any case, these technologies do exist. Never doubt that they do. Their existence has been protected and hidden from the prying eyes of the majority of humanity for a long time. In the spirit of 2015 and looking to the future, I would suggest that people take up the challenge of informing themselves of the reality of this subject. Andrew Johnson has used a wonderful phrase to some up this subject: “Infinite Energy – But not for the Masses.”  (See: http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=314&Itemid=55 )


It is time for this paradigm to change, so that the shape of everybody’s future can be remoulded for the better.


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

Getting Serious about "Sirius" - Andrew Johnson

Here is an excellent article written by Andrew Johnson reviewing the recently released film: "Sirius" - the long term project involving Dr Steven Greer. Andrew has made some interesting and important observations about the project, that relate to some research I am currently doing. I have reposted the article below. The original article, containing all weblinks relevant to the subject, can be viewed here:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=374&Itemid=51

Getting Serious about "Sirius" - Andrew Johnson - 06 May 2013
I wanted to post a review of the new Sirius film because of the long “build up” to its release –and the apparent level of attention it has garnered on the internet. It seems to have a substantial and fairly well-organised marketing campaign behind it – such as ads embedded on websites (e.g. http://www.openminds.tv/ as of 28th Apr 2013).

At one time, I may have been more enthusiastic about the release of such a film. In the last few years, I have become sceptical of the way Dr Steven Greer has been “doing things”, even though he is the reason I got "into this stuff" heavily in 2003. Over 4 years ago, I ended up writing an article, about why I have no confidence in what Greer has been doing. A related article has been written by my friend, David Shewchuk, and this was posted  on Henry Makow's site. It's fairly short and very worthwhile reading – even though it covers some of the troubling events which have occurred in connection with Greer’s investigation into the UFO evidence (such as the death of New Mexico congressman Steven Schiff).

Advertising and Marketing
Before discussing the Sirius film’s content, I would just like to note what adverts/postings for the film typically show online. Various embedded panels will show “Watch Sirius instantly for $9.99; Available for a 72-hour rental period; Buy the DVD for only $19.99”. One puzzle to me is that it is said that the film has been “crowd-funded”, yet it is now being sold – so do the crowd funders get a share of the returns? Maybe not – I don’t know how these things are set up. Now, of course films with production values like Sirius are expensive to make – if you choose to make them in the way that Sirius is made. Perhaps I am biased – because I try to give away all the material I compile either for free or at close-to-cost price.

Nevertheless, because of the glitzy-packaging of information in today’s CGI-loaded visual media, I can appreciate a requirement for more “attention grabbing production”. One could argue for lengthy periods about the relative merits of “giving away things for free” and/or “making things cheaply” or giving them a “professional, contemporary feel and look.” Higher production quality can attract higher numbers of viewers or hold viewers’ attention for longer, perhaps. Or, if viewers are truly interested in the information, does a more basic and less expensive presentation suffice?

The Beginning of the Film
The setting at the very beginning of the film, a lecture by Steven Greer – and people are entering the building – and being body-scanned by a security person of some kind. Soon after this is shown, the narrator (Thomas Jane) says “Most people don’t know what a dead-man’s trigger is…” – well, googling this phrase reveals some odd definitions – most relating to TV or movies, it seems. However, it seems to be a peculiar way of starting this film. In the first 7 minutes of the film, Ted Loder and Laurance Rockefeller are mentioned. It is not mentioned (not that it necessarily should be) that Loder is Greer’s cousin, but no real evidence of any kind at all is discussed – and it becomes clear that the style of the film is one of “docu-drama” – or something similar to that. The film runs for about 1 hour and 50 minutes (but there are an additional 6 minutes of “credits” at the end, listing those who helped fund the film).

Atacama Humanoid - Evidence
Let us now turn to one of the “items” which is given the most exposure in the film – the so-called “Atacama Humanoid” (“Ata”). As far as I can recall, this only came onto Greer’s “Radar Screen” after the Sirius film was first announced. Stories of this were circulated on alternative talk shows like “Coast to Coast” for some months – yet the “humanoid” itself was discovered in 2003 – again over 10 years ago. Thankfully, the documentation about “Ata” can be found (free) on the “Sirius Disclosure Website” in a Synopsis by Steven Greer, a Report and Summary by Dr. Garry Nolan and a report on Radiographic Imagery (X-rays) of the being by Dr Ralph Lachman. Neither the film nor the documentation give a definitive answer for what “Ata” actually is. The film briefly discusses that tests show that the mitochondrial DNA is more human-like than non-human. Curiously, there is no discussion of any nuclear DNA tests on the being. Readers who have followed Lloyd Pye’s “Starchild” research would probably agree that the Starchild Skull is rather more compelling evidence of a non-human (and non-primate) being (but superficially human in appearance) than what the data from “Ata” has so far shown.

Another analysis of some of the photos by “Paolo V” suggests “Ata” it is indeed a foetus and not a 6-year old child. Paolo V  suggests the lower 2 ribs have not developed and so there are only 10 in total. He points out the lack of developing/developed teeth (which would be seen, in some form, in a 6-year old child).

I have to point out that the “Starchild” skull – and much other evidence outside the “Greerosphere” is not mentioned in any way, shape or form in the Sirius film.

UFO Evidence Discussed or Mentioned
The film jumps around between different areas of evidence – and has a of “flash editing” in many places – switching between one of Greer’s lectures or “retreats” and then segments of witness testimony. Copying directly from my notes, the following topics are touched on – just within the first 18 minutes of the film: Black budgets, Ancient nukes (brief appearances by Michael Cremo and David Wilcock), ET’s/UFOs in paintings etc, Sightings from 1950’s onwards, Wilbert Smith (captioned “Wilbur Smith” in the film), footage from the “Tether” incident (Space Shuttle Mission STS75), bits of testimony from some Disclosure Project witnesses, footage from one or more CSETI expeditions and then the 1992 Gulf Breeze sightings (Florida), which Dr Greer contends was initiated by what his group were doing in attempts to communicate with ET’s at that time.

UFO-related topics that are covered include the Phoenix Lights (1997) with Dr Lynne Kitei and also Fyfe Symington’s “U-turn” about them, some Space Shuttle Footage. MUFON is also mentioned and we get to hear most of Dr Robert Jacobs’ account of his experience as a USAF photographer in 1964, but it’s not as well-presented as in James Fox’s 2003 documentary “Out of the Blue” (which Greer was also involved with). Statements by Carol Rosin and Clifford Stone are also shown.

Free Energy Evidence Discussed or Mentioned
The film covers many different important topics – with perhaps only 1 or 2 minutes devoted to each one. Energy related topics include a mention of John Searle, Thomas Townsend Brown, Dr Eugene Mallove, T Henry Moray and Tom Bearden (but for Tom Bearden, please also see this article). Tom Valone also appears several times to discuss some of his experiences.

9/11 and Secrecy
The events of 9/11 are covered very briefly, and a, somewhat generalised, statement is made that “it is hard to concretely prove 9/11 was a false flag attack”. This is followed by short coverage of Kennedy’s “Secrecy” speech, Cynthia McKinney’s question to Donald Rumsfeld on 10 Sep 2001 about “the missing trillions” and there is mention of SAPS, USAPS and Black Projects. Of course, no kind of link between 9/11 and Black Projects is implied or openly stated – the only possible clue that is given is that these things are covered one after the other in the film… No mention is made of the direct, established connection between the “free energy” issue, cold fusion and 9/11, as shown in the research of Dr Judy Wood in her book “Where Did the Towers Go?”.

Consciousness and Contact
One of the other topics mentioned is the all important one of Consciousness and the analogy of how our consciousness seems to be something like a TV set which we can “tune” to allow us to decode certain signals or frequencies. This is not covered in depth (as with most topics in the film). Also, several segments of Greer’s CSETI retreats – to different locations – are intermingled with other footage. (Some footage has selected faces of people pixelated out). It is mentioned that Greer has been involved with training people to contact ET’s using methods such as Coherent Thought Sequencing and Remote Viewing. (You can sign up for a trip/course at www.etcontactnow.com or find more information at www.cseti.org). I became quite interested in these aspects a few years ago, but did not explore them in depth, nor did I go on one of Greer’s retreats.

Further Additional Notes and Topics Covered
There is the necessary inclusion of Eisenhower’s warning about the Military Industrial Complex from his 1961 leaving address. And then there is mention 24 countries “opening their UFO files” to scrutiny (although the nature of what has been revealed is not really discussed – and most of the documents released simply discuss sightings by military and other personnel)

Conclusion
Having viewed the film, I would contend that in terms of the actual evidence discussed, there is little which is new in this film – indeed, apart from the “humanoid”, I would describe the film as a kind of “video blog” about Dr Greer, punctuated with segments from the Disclosure Project witness testimonies recorded over 10 years ago. The “Ata” evidence is inconclusive, though Dr Greer does not seem keen to admit this – nor does he acknowledge more solid, tested evidence that is readily available.

As mentioned above, there are huge “holes” in the film – such as the absence of any discussion or even a mention of the evidence which proves the links between topics in the film and how the WTC was destroyed.

Also absent in the discussion of “contact” is what is being communicated – and who – or what is on the other side of that communication. Perhaps I am being unfair – it is implied that feelings of peace, love and good will are to be communicated – which is all very good – and fine, though I suppose I am the sort of person looking for more specific concepts or information to be communicated in some ways. And if more specific information cannot be communicated, why isn’t it said that… “There's a starman waiting in the sky. He’d like to come and meet us - But he thinks he'd blow our minds”?

And, a key question is why is this film called Sirius? No explanation (that I could detect) is made in the film? Is it some encoded reference to the fascinating history of the Dogon Tribe? Sirius is not “a place” I have previously seen associated with any of Greer’s postings or published research.

Also introduced in the film is the “Sirius Technology and Research Initiative” – which sounds very similar to “SEAS Power”, Aero2012 and “The Orion Project”. Indeed, the page above makes the links between the two quite clear – whilst providing little or no information about what previous initiatives have achieved – only information which can be found on other websites. (As already mentioned and linked above, I wrote about this at length in an article called “Something in the Aero”.)

So, overall, Sirius is like a “Greer-centric” version of Foster Gamble’s “Thrive” documentary (which I also made a short posting about) – with less information in it and more of a “UFO/ET” slant. In both films, the most important information and links (re 9/11) are firmly omitted.
Overall, the film may serve a purpose in arousing the interest of certain types of people in the topics that are covered in the film. Beyond that, people will need to look elsewhere for much of the necessary detail and also, more critically, for the information which is left out. I think if they were going to spend money on an online rental of the film, it would be a waste – as you can watch much better documentaries – such as “Out of the Blue” for free, or get new or second-hand DVD’s from places like Amazon.

What is more worrying to me is that Greer is yet again asking people to contribute money to his “Sirius” initiative, as he did with Seaspower, Aero2012 and the Orion Project, yet he has apparently no new information and no new “plan”. (When this question was asked of Greer in an interview with him at the time of the Citizen’s Disclosure Hearings, he became somewhat uncomfortable talking about it – claiming that peoples’ lives had been threatened in the Orion Project. So how will the same thing not happen in this latest initiative – and what did the $3 million Orion Project achieve?)

I hope that this article has served to supply some thoughts and information which are not generally available and it will encourage readers to think and research carefully – so that we can achieve the sorts of things that are talked about in films like “Sirius” and “Thrive”. It has become clear to me that unless the figures featured in these films (and the researchers and producers who make them) fully acknowledge the obstacles in our way – as I have written about elsewhere on this website – then significant and rapid positive change is far less likely – because the same mistakes will be repeated endlessly, as they seem to have been in Steven Greer’s case since at least 2001.

Andrew Johnson will be presenting his talk "Infinite Energy - But Not For the Masses" at the "Awakened State" Alternative Research Conference in Edinburgh on Saturday 11th May 2013. http://www.awakenedstate.co.uk/

Further dates include:
Penzance Truth Action - Secrets in the Solar System - May 15th 2013 - Lugger Hotel
Truthjiuce Hull - 911 Finding the Truth - Weds 12 June 2013
Huddersfield - 5th UK Exopolitics Conference - 28th Sept 2013

You can also watch his most recent interviews on Richplanet TV by clicking the links below:
Apollo Conspiracy:
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=145&part=1
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=145&part=2
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=145&part=3
Ask The Astronauts
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=146&part=1
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=146&part=2
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=146&part=3
 Life On Mars
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=150&part=1
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=150&part=2
http://www.richplanet.net/starship_main.php?ref=150&part=3

Dr Judy Wood - UK Presentations

Dr Judy Wood - author of "Where Did The Towers Go?", will be speaking at several venues across the UK over the next few weeks. For anybody who is unaware of her work, this will be unique opportunity to hear her talk about her extensive and exhaustive research into 9/11 - research which truly lifts the lid on what really did happen to The Twin Towers and has huge implications regarding Free Energy Technology.

Following her appearance (this weekend) at the Breakthrough Energy Movement (BEM) Conference in Holland, Dr Wood will be giving a number of presentations around the UK – in a packed schedule. She will be giving an updated/augmented presentation following on from the ones she gave in October 2011 in the UK. It is hoped that at least one of these will be filmed and made available online and/or in DVD format.

For full details of dates and venues, visit:
http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=360&Itemid=60
Or for further information contact ad.johnson@ntlworld.com or lisajudy@nctv.com

The Truth Seeker's Guide.

Movements...

   If truth were a tangible place, like a town or city, it would be a very dangerous place to live! Despite appearing like a utopian destination and for all the benefits and worth of getting there, there would be times when it would erupt into a bloody showdown like an old western frontier town. Other times you might feel like you were living in one of those Soviet based, mock American towns of the 50s or The Village – the one immortalised by the excellent 60s show: The Prisoner. Problems are always made by people though. The place is enormously incidental.

   Truth is almost always a contrivance, utilised by some as a means to manipulate and understood subjectively by others. We can partly blame the way our conscious/subconscious mind interprets information and our ‘trust’ in the source of it, some we can blame on our predispositions and bias, the rest of the blame lies firmly at the feet of those who understand perfectly how to manipulate these psychological processes in others.

   The architects of the hidden state of global affairs are singularly powered by the vast majority of humanity’s ignorance (of a situation), mass apathy or willingness to just let them get on with it. There are those that are a little more informed or proactive though. Knowledge really is power, but how can you be sure that you really do ‘know’? And if you ever do ‘know’, how do you decide to act on it?

Large scale realisations have always spawned large scale

reactions and thus, a movement is always born. History is replete with examples. From the Suffragettes and the New Age movement to Anti-War and 9/11, mass social stirrings become driven by the promise of justice, enlightenment or change.  The driving forces of these movements are decent, honest and well-intentioned people who want to make the world a better place. Without them there could be no movement. But is it naïve to think that these movements have been created solely from a collective sense of conscience? That everybody shaping, developing and driving them are equally as honourable as those with the best of intentions?

   Sadly, history also shows us that certain individuals and groups have played a hand in the nature of these movements. It shows us that while some movements have been co-opted and usurped at some stage, others have been created or instigated by agents of the global agenda players (for one reason or another) and given what we know about these agenda players, we can only assume that their intentions were not to benefit the social majority.

   In the 1960s, those opposed to the war in Vietnam were gaining momentum in bringing the injustice and hypocrisies of the conflict to the world’s attention. It became the mandate of western intelligence and military organisations to do everything they could to infiltrate and discredit those who had the ability to sway public opinion, and distract the rest. The exposure of the MKULTRA project era alone, shows how intelligence agency sourced LSD was introduced far and wide into society with the intention (amongst others) of disassociating many from their political activism.

   As for those with a visible anti-war profile (writers, artists and musicians), a leaked memorandum dated April 26th 1976 shows how several government branches were tasked with painting these individuals as “scurrilous and depraved”, highlight their “living conditions and habits” and attempt to discolour their character with sexual indiscretions, drug charges, planting narcotics, sending in women to break up marriages, misinformation (to confuse and disrupt) and alerting the media to their activities. They even obtained handwriting specimens to fake documents, enflamed existing personal conflicts and animosities, and provoked rival groups in the hope of inciting hostilities and murders. (see: “The Covert War Against Rock” – Alex Constantine)

   The Cointelpro days of the 60s and 70s are extensively documented, with everything from The Black Panthers to the Yippies being infiltrated by various agency. Officially, this infiltration was justified in order to protect the larger public from “disruptive subversion”. In reality, much of their activities involved agitating members of these various groups, often pitting them against each other through various forms of subterfuge (such as blackmail.)

On the other side of the spectrum, the apolitical New Age

movement was equally exposed to subversion via agencies such as the FBI, CIA and NSA. During the early 70s, institutions such as Esalen made it possible for a huge increase in the number of agents to infiltrate the “human potential” movement.

   These are just a few examples of the global players utilising their apparatus to redirect the power of the masses.

  In recent times, we have learned (all too painfully) how governments have advanced agendas by getting everybody on board with a certain belief system. 9/11 was the conduit through which the mantra of “threats” from new “global enemies” could dogmatise the masses into accepting not only wars of aggression, occupation of foreign countries and policies of “regime change”, but also sweeping changes that curtailed individual rights and freedoms.

   The West (particularly NATO countries) has also taken huge liberties with the desire for freedom that has grown out of the post-9/11 world. There have been claims that many of the uprisings of 2011 were infiltrated by "agent provocateurs”. According to former CIA counterterrorist analyst Michael Scheuer, the US intelligence agency gave training and logistical support to the anti-Gaddafi “resistance” and that “Obama secretly authorised this covert operation.”

   Of course, this is nothing new. You need only research Operation Gladio to understand the extent to which these operations have been carried out in the past. Gladio was a “far-right secret army, operated by the CIA and MI6 through NATO, which killed hundreds of innocent Europeans and attempted to blame the deaths on Baader Meinhof, Red Brigades and other left wing groups. Known as 'stay-behinds' these armies were given access to military equipment which was supposed to be used for sabotage after a Soviet invasion. Instead it was used in massacres across mainland Europe as part of a CIA Strategy of Tension. Gladio killing sprees in Belgium and Italy were carried out for the purpose of frightening the national political classes into adopting U.S. policies.” (see: BBC Documentary, “Timewatch: Operation Gladio”, 1992, Director Allan Frankovich) The “Timewatch” documentary (surprising for the BBC… although it was pre-9/11) shows in detail how Gladio was a quintessential example of cointelpro / agent provocateur strategy.

   The aftermath of 9/11 has also had the effect of mobilising popular opinion. One of the few examples of an effective social mobilisation appeared in the fallout from the invasion of Iraq and the WMD farce. Millions of people took to streets of numerous cities to protest against an illegal war. The sheer outrage against government policies and particular individuals, such as Bush and Blair, reminded the powers that be of the potential threat from genuine people power...  something which scared them witless.

   The 21st century is a curious time for truth. More people are now waking up to the reality of a hidden history / global truth and the alternative community has become a force to be reckoned with. For possibly the first time, a battleground of sorts has appeared with various psychological weaponry, infiltration and armaments being deployed on all sides. As much as we might want to think in terms of black and white, good and evil, goodies and baddies, there have never really been any clearly defined boundaries in truth… especially now.

   With the power of the movement now stronger than ever, there are some very controversial questions to ask. It is becoming a question of “pick your side”, rather than “what do you think?” This kind of boxed mentality makes ‘Truth’ a very dangerous place indeed… recognising and questioning it, even more so. Never the less, these questions are a responsibility of truth. Why does enlightenment need to have a representative middleman? They say that the truth speaks for itself, so why all of a sudden does it need to be led by the hand?

Questioning the nature and intentions of certain individuals in modern

movements is like opening Pandora’s Box. Every question asked by a researcher about facets of 9/11 Truth or The Occupy Movement often invites attack or counter questions of personal intentions. Yet these are important questions to ask. Andrew Johnson’s book “9/11 – Finding the Truth” raises some very important questions about the connections between certain prolific researchers and assorted military/industrial complex players and their associates. It also shows a clear and multi-pronged attack upon those supporting the idea of a connection between 9/11 and directed free-energy technology (specifically the work of Dr Judy Wood.)

   “Nanomanagement: The Disintegration of a Non-Profit Corporation” by Michael Armenia discusses (albeit from a biased perspective) the collapse of ‘Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth’. Appendix C (page 236) includes the March 12, 2009 draft of the “Volunteer Vetting Procedures” of those wishing to be involved with the group. These extensive investigation procedures specify being careful to watch for those who could potentially be destructive for the movement. The ‘destructive’ criteria include those who have researched “no planes”, “directed energy weapons” and “Judy Wood.” Why is this so? ‘No-planers’ and ‘DEW’ researchers have something crucial to bring to any legitimate investigation of 9/11. Is this the reason why they are side-lined, attacked or discredited?

   I’ve heard it said that in order to get ‘non-truthers’ to take 9/11 seriously, the research needs to stay within the realms of possible /plausible reality. Only a cursory look at the directed free-energy research (relating to 9/11) shows something perfectly possible or plausible. The ramifications of this area of study are huge, maybe that’s the point. Such knowledge would need to be discredited and kept from mass public awareness, and therefore imply the necessity for subversion in some areas of 9/11 truth.

More recently, many have started to cast an eye over

aspects of the Occupy movement. Although it is much harder to point to specific concerns (unlike 9/11), it is hard to ignore the recent alleged connections between Occupy and say: George Soros, Adbusters, The Lucis Trust, and Ivan Marovic and Srdja Popovic . The last two chaps are intricately associated with OPTOR/CANVAS (Centre For Applied Non-violent Action And Strategies), which was founded as a “non-violent revolutionary group” by Serbians and responsible for driving the uprising that overthrew Slobodan Milosevic in the late 90s/early 2000s.

   Popovic claims that CANVAS is 100% privately funded with no involvement from the US government, yet it is alleged by many that OTPOR/CANVAS has become a powerful CIA front, creating the model for popular global uprisings. William Engdahl claims that OTPOR now operates as “revolutionary consultants” in over 50 countries and is geared toward finding ways to instigate “regime change”.

   Numerous individuals have come out in support of Occupy and spoken at various rallies. It is worth noting that some of these folk are big in the alternative world, yet whenever they take to these platforms of expression, they fail to even mention 9/11 or any other ‘bigger picture’ issues. Interesting that…

   On a more esoteric level, we have the likes of Kanye West (with his Rockefeller connections) spouting on about Occupy. The use of the human loudspeaker system (with its repetitive slogan aspect) and the bizarre uptake of the pyramid hand sign at rallies (allegedly symbolising a ‘point of procedure’ or something like that).

Also remember that Occupy was (in order)

totally ignored the mainstream media, then totally ridiculed, then labelled as a union-sponsored, anti-free market, pro-Marxist movement. Nowadays Occupy is often compared to the Tea Party and (much as it was) labelled as a “grassroots” movement… a buzzword that we should be very suspicious of. It almost appears as though it has now become credible in the eyes of the MSN and anything MSN speaks favourably about should be eyed very warily. I am always extremely cautious when the media changes their tune about something, let alone four times! There are also several pieces of footage floating around on the internet that show staged, small scale protests for the benefit of the cameras. One such piece was broadcast on RT, omitting the cue to the cameraman at the beginning.

   I suspect the origins of Occupy to be largely benign in nature, but this still doesn’t exclude the possibility of infiltration. It is well documented that the US Department of Homeland Security has already classified the Occupy movement as a “potential security risk”. Similar observations have been made by several western government agencies. They wouldn’t say such things and then let them just get on with it. It would actually be naïve to think that Occupy hasn’t already been infiltrated. The question is: to what extent?

   Before I am accused of sounding totally damning, I must make it clear that I have nothing against movements. I wrote, back in October, about the pride I felt when watching Occupy take to the streets across countless cities around the world. Social uprisings can change the world in wonderful ways. However, the voice of the few that starts to represent the many is exactly the same as that which we fight to expose. These people who steer or micromanage a cause (even with the best of intentions) can so easily be misdirected, misinformed or even corrupted.

   So what does this say about our little “town called truth” then?

   In order to decide what to do and how to act, we must first learn. As I pointed out in the first paragraph, the problems all stem from people. Unfortunately, there is no such thing as an original thought. To learn, we must study what others have already accumulated and it is here that personal agendas (good and bad) can get in the way.  We all know that there are high profile individuals (researchers & authors in the alternative community) who are slanted by an extreme left/right political perspective, xenophobic tendencies or spiritual/religious leanings. This is a shame because within their bias lies some well researched, important and factual information. If people fail to separate stance from facts, they can be so easily and blindly led… even when it seems like a just cause.

   No matter how enlightened we think we may be, remember that we are only the hair of gnat’s knacker away from sheep! The facts remain that, with regard to our cognitive processes, we either want to be led or need to be from time to time and in the case of early age it is a practical necessity that literally forms those processes. 

Despite all this, it is important to keep in

mind that you only as powerful or awake as you want to be. It takes time but it gets easier the more you do it. A little common sense (not in the traditional sense!!) can go a long way. Learn all you can lay your hands. Get in the faces of the knowledge bearers and ask questions, get them to point you to all the places that inspired / informed them and make up your own mind. If you don’t ask, you won’t get… and never be ashamed of asking. With enough wisdom, you’ll know how to act and when. You’ll know when it is the right time to say “NO!”

Until next time…
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

Andrew Johnson & Dr Judy Wood @ Truth Juice, Birmingham

   On Tuesday evening, I attended an event in Birmingham organised by ’Truth Juice’. These folks are an ever growing group of truth enthusiasts who hold regular talks by noted researchers on a variety of subjects across numerous venues in the UK. I was looking forward to this particular event because it hosted a talk by Andrew Johnson, who was discussing his ongoing investigation into 9/11 and the possibility of the more unconventional means used to perpetrate the event.

   It would also be an interesting night for several other reasons. For the first time, I would be going with a truth ‘novice’! My friend had only recently become aware of the possibility that 9/11 was something other than the illusion perpetuated in the mainstream, after hearing me talk on the subject. Secondly, I would also get a nice surprise when I found out that Dr Judy Wood (author of the seminal investigative work, “Where Did The Towers Go?”) had attended, unannounced, and would also be doing a presentation.

   The fact that 2 experienced researchers were now effectively fitting the time slot of one, meant that the event became slightly rushed at times. I was a little disappointed as I had to go to work at midnight and this resulted in my missing the closing minutes of Andrew’s Q & A session with the audience. I was also looking forward to a lengthy talk by Andrew, which had to be compressed a little to account for time. This is not to detract from the event though! Despite the breakneck speed (I was scribbling notes like the clappers!), Andrew was still as thorough as ever and he apologised to the audience, about the speed on several occasions. It also allowed for Dr Wood to speak as well, which I was pleased about and would have been impossible, otherwise…

   For those who don’t know, the work of Andrew Johnson and Dr Judy Wood (in relation to 9/11) considers the very strong possibility that some form of directed (and ultimately, weaponised) Free Energy Technology was utilised to destroy the buildings in World Trade Centre Plaza on September 11, 2001.

   Dr Wood kicked off proceedings with an hour long talk about the evidence relating to the destruction of the towers, beginning with a focus on the millions of tons of debris (or lack thereof) that should have remained. The audience were shown footage of the dust patterns, the upward “lathering” effect, the ground fumes (which many call smoke from heat or fires) that were in the immediate vicinity of very wet vehicle tracks, the unburned paper and trees phenomenon, the “glowing Cheetos” (as she called them) that sat atop unburned paper and the strange ‘slicing’ effect that had totally removed parts of buildings and, yet, left the adjoining sections seemingly untouched. Dr Wood stated that the term ‘pile’, at Ground Zero, was misleading and should be, more appropriately, renamed “the leftovers”.

   Next came some interesting facts about the location of WTC Plaza: bedrock, located 70 feet below the water table. The area also has something called the “Bathtub Wall”, which prevents the flooding of New York. It is strange to note that on 9/11, the “Bathtub Wall” suffered insignificant damage; inconsistent with the level it should have sustained if buildings of this size had ‘collapsed’. It was also interesting to note that the tunnels under the Hudson remained dry after they had been pumped of excess water. Wouldn’t they have sustained, at least, some cracks and leaks?

   The focus then came on to the seismic readings on 9/11. Seismographs measure something called a P-Wave (which precedes the main shock wave) during most Earthquakes or events which would produce a readable tremor. The destruction of the towers apparently produced readings absent a P-Wave. The readings were also inconsistent with an event of that magnitude. WTC 7 only measured 0.6, WTC 1 was the equivalent of a 20 storey building collapse and WTC 2 was the equivalent of a 16 storey building. Dr Wood also presented some in depth analytical data showing that a building collapse of that size should have taken at least 31 seconds.

   At this point, proceedings were interrupted briefly by somebody smashing a glass at the back of the room! Somebody at the back complained that they couldn’t hear Dr Wood and accused her of mumbling when she turned to face the projector screen. Whilst I appreciate people wanting to hear clearly (the microphone system was unfortunately down, so both speakers had to manage without), I felt it was disrespectful to called Dr Wood a ‘mumbler’. I will come to this individual shortly.

   Things quickly settled and proceeded onto the subject of the infamous ‘scorched’ and ‘rusted’ cars. Dr Wood acknowledged the debate over the towing of cars to locations much farther away from Ground Zero. She said that whilst this may be the case for many vehicles, it is not the case for all of them. She also pointed out the missing door latches on several vehicles and the eyewitness accounts of cars along West Broadway, that seemed to suddenly and inexplicably “spontaneously combust”. She also looked at the “Rolled Up Carpet” effect, the buckling of the tower’s outer wall cladding that should have occurred, but didn’t and the twisting and buckling effect on many of the steel girders.

   Dr Wood then discussed the behaviour of Hurricane Erin (that was due to make landfall on the morning of 9/11) and it’s abrupt change of direction. We were presented with several pieces of weather report footage that totally omitted Hurricane Erin from the weather maps, audio of a CBS weather anchor saying that the weather was “as nice as can be” and a bizarre commentary from a news anchor (after 9/11) saying, “If only a hurricane had hit on 9/11! The attacks may never have happened!”.

   The final segment, the principles of ‘field effect’ and, specifically, The Hutchison Effect was analysed. I am no scientist, so some of this difficult to explain. However, Hutchison’s work is well documented on the internet and extensive overviews of the Effect can be studied on both Andrew Johnson and Dr Judy Wood’s websites. The links for which are in the left hand ‘Links’ column and at the end of this post.

   Dr Wood closed the talk with the rhetorical question: “where did the towers go?!”. Some bright spark at the back of the audience shouted, “China!”. Dr Wood wittily replied, “Yeah! The upper atmosphere of China!!”.

   Dr Wood did a one on one Q & A session to speed up proceedings, by allowing others to go and get another drink, go to the loo, have a cigarette (my vice!), etc. Whilst outside having a smoke and chatting to my novice friend, I overheard a couple talking about the chap who had made the ‘mumbling’ remark. They remarked that this was the same individual who, not only broke the glass, but also made the “China” witticism. Shortly after, said chap came outside, with what was presumably his partner and said, “I don’t know why I’m listening to this!”. She replied, “Well why don’t you go home and complain to yourself, while I stay here and listen!”. At least somebody in the relationship had an open mind…

   Next up, Andrew Johnson began his talk about the various aspects of the notion of “Cover Ups” and the specific relationship with 9/11. I got the impression (I apologise if I’m wrong, Andrew!) that Andrew had picked up on the odd voices of dissent in the audience. He said, (re: the subject at hand) “If you think we’re lying, all the information is there… you can even email me!”. He pointed to the various areas of research and where to look for it. This aspect of the attempts by certain individuals to debunk and discredit the Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) and ‘No Planes’ research, was also a component of his presentation.

   Andrew Johnson pointed out a very important aspect of truth research and is something that I also try very hard to stay true to in my research: “Evidence is key before drawing conclusions”. Any such issues should be treated as akin to a “Forensic Investigation”. He pointed out the work of Dr Morgan Reynolds: far too much to discuss here so, please, investigate. Andrew launched into some mathematical equations for calculating the various aspects freefall time and speed, etc. Whoosh, over my head! Jotted them down and checked them out with a mathematician friend today. They are sound, by the way, but if you want to understand them more fully, please visit Andrew’s website or contact him.

   Following this was a fascinating dissection of the concept of the “Illusion Of Truth”. Perception is everything. He cited numerous examples throughout history, where perception is key. The Iraqi incubator babies incident was given as a very good example. The witness to this, who incidentally was cited endlessly in the MSN (and testified before the US Congress) as a simple nurse, turned out to be nothing of the kind and was in fact, the daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the US and who was part of the PR firm Hill & Knowlton.. Who were believed to have been hired to create a ploy as a pretext (or excuse) for the first war in Iraq.

   He also cited various examples such as The Project For The New American Century (“a new Pearl Harbour”) and Operation Northwoods, although he did raise some questions of validity regarding the Northwoods documents. Finally, this section covered the Zapruder film and inconsistencies between the locations of fatal wounds to JFK in the film and the wound locations in the autopsy photographs, suggesting that one or the other is fake. Andrew also highlighted the movements of eye witnesses (in the Zapruder film) which seem to defy the laws of physics. It would seem that there is a clear indication here, that the film has been tampered with (i.e.: re-edited). This prompted an “Oh My God!” and look of amazement from my novice friend. Result!

   Andrew then discussed the notion of the ‘No Planes’ perspective and the controversial debate regarding the use of ‘Holograms’. He looked at various pieces of footage of the ‘plane impacts’ and raised questions regarding the large ‘exit’ explosion… something that should have been confined to the ‘impact’ zone. It is strange that upon ‘impact’, the plane seems to disappear into the building completely, before any reaction or damage occurs. It does seem that there is almost certainly a delayed ‘fireball’ effect. There is also the issue of a plane which is substantially constructed from carbon fibre and aluminium… could this penetrate 3 inch steel girders, let alone the rest of the buildings?! He pointed out that many have said, “Well it was the speed of the plane… 500 mph is pretty fast”. However, he noted that 700ft above sea level, a plane can only travel, at most, 300 mph because the air is thicker. The plane would have literally shaken itself apart. Despite this, there were no bits of the plane breaking off before ‘impact’….
He also discussed the dispersal and damage pattern of fuselage sections and the landing gear, which don’t seem to match the damage that a plane (hitting these buildings in the way they did) would have sustained.

   Andrew played an audio section of a phone call between Michael Herzakhani (who captured key footage of the impact) and Canadian researcher Jeff Hill, where Hill asked Herzakhani to confirm that he shot the footage. “You have to call CNN”, he says. “They have all the rights to the video, I can’t even talk about it…sorry”.

   As time was against him, things sped up and I tried to make notes as quickly as possible. Further discussion included: Edna Cinton viewed in the hole… no heat or flames, contradictions in the Black Box story, No serial numbers of any plane parts at WTC have ever been published and the various eyewitness accounts: some hearing a plane but not seeing it and others, vice versa. It was interesting that 2 witnesses that stood right next to each, totally contradicted each other’s account of the second plane. He also posed the notion that maybe the numerous exercises taking place on 9/11 have been woven into (possibly the source of) the ‘official’ accounts of the events of 9/11.

   The talk then moved onto the apparent attempts by many 9/11 (and non 9/11) researchers to distance themselves from, discredit and even debunk the work of Dr Judy Wood, Andrew Johnson and anyone else who follows a similar line of investigation. Andrew explained how he was invited to be a member of 9/11 Scholars For Truth and that he did get involved for a while. He cited people like Steven Jones, who he assumed was a genuine individual. He felt it was of the utmost importance to educate people about 9/11, this being the original perspective of the cause. He eventually realised that a key component of the cause was also discerning the possible cause, but found that more and more, this seemed increasingly unimportant to some. Andrews says, “I was being used to put out disinformation. I trusted these people”.

   He now believes that the focus of the cause has become exclusively: Thermite, Thermate, Space Thermite, Nano Thermite, Paint on Thermite, etc., yet, “No one wants to analyse it for fear of exposing the flaws… (People are) being trained to think about this and this alone: Thermite”. He cited various individuals involved in the movement who once supported Dr Wood and now lambaste her work. He also referred to John Moffet who said about Dr Wood, “She is not a scientist, she is a crackpot… she does not follow the basic tenets of science”. This seems an unusual remark given that Dr Wood’s research is almost exclusively scientific in principle and she has more letters after her name than I’ve got fingers and toes!… That’s a slight exaggeration, of course!

   Andrew briefly discussed the Qui Tam cases, highlighting that NIST have been sued twice for fraud relating to Data Quality Act (DQA) and the issue of correcting fraudulent documentation. As was pointed out, NIST and contractors have had extensive involvement with Directed Energy Research and Development projects. Bit of a coincidence me thinks! Several other companies of note (of a similar nature) include Applied Research Associates, Boeing, Lockheed Martin (of which Norman Mineta was Vice President, prior to joining the Commerce Department) and SAIC. If you’re not in the know, please look into them. Andrew also pointed out the interesting inclusion of a plane in Architects and Engineers For 9/11 logo…

   The talk rounded off with a quote from Lenin: “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves”. Andrew made it clear that he didn’t want people to just believe him. “I want you to check the evidence. Think for yourself and use your initiative”. Wise words to anybody looking for the truth…

   My novice friend was disappointed that the latter end of the talk became centred around the attempts by some to debunk the DEW / No Planes perspective. As I explained, if somebody was continually discrediting your work in order to create a wholly inclusive perspective (that is incidentally difficult to prove), wouldn’t you want to expose it? My friend said “In an ideal world, the evidence I’ve seen tonight should speak for itself”. “Sadly, we don’t live in an ideal world”, I said.

   This seemed to be reinforced in the closing Q and A. When asked about the ‘molten metal’, Andrew said, “we don’t know what it was”. Some donkey in the audience (I’m not as magnanimous as Andrew, sadly!) said, “it looks like Thermite to me!”. Andrew wisely replied, “It might be, it might not… we don’t know”. From my perspective, I believe that “The beginning of wisdom is… I don’t know”.

   Some have unfairly said that proponents of the DEW perspective are aggressive, rude and unwilling to listen. I’m beginning to think that is an apt description of those who oppose the DEW perspective. Both Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson were accommodating, polite and friendly to everybody that attended, even the nay-sayers. They really went out of their way to give the audience a thorough and thought provoking night.

   As an aside, I must stress that I don’t believe that the DEW debunkers are indicative of the entire Truth movement. In fact experience has shown me that the majority are often open to alternative perspectives. Sadly though, it is the minority that are influencing the movement and, as a result unfairly influencing some in the larger community.

   I must also thank those who organised the event, for making me welcome and for the tea and cakes! They did a great job and I really hope that Truth Juice is around for a long time to come.

I had a chance to natter with Andrew before his talk, about various, serious and amusing, aspects of our work. We chatted about Project Pegasus (of all things!) and he told me that I could become a life time member of Project Pegasus for only $100!!:  http://www.projectpegasus.net/lifetime_membership 

He knows of my blog, that I would be covering it in this post and if he didn’t mind this. He said, “I know where you live so if you write anything bad, I’ll come round and kick your arse!”
I hope I’ve dodged the bullet!!

• Andrew Johnson's website - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php
• His book "9/11 - Finding The Truth" - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=238&Itemid=60
• Dr Judy Wood's website - http://drjudywood.com/
• Her Book "Where Did The Towers Go?" - http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/ 
• You can also view a version of this presentation from earlier this year - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psESV3Nfsdk (slides not that clear)
  

Till Next Time.
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
(P.S. Andrew has read my post and said my
arse is safe - in fact he offered to send me a nice cushion to sit on!!)


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html