From the moment Gil Scott-Heron penned the classic - “The Revolution Will Not Be Televised”, countless individuals have searched for the true meaning of his words. Since the advent of television, it is claimed that many a revolution has unfolded on the box, for all to see. The truth is that, really, all we see are varying amounts of people making a statement about something for a period of time. This is not to trivialise such matters… as I will explain.
Context is everything. Why does a revolution happen? There can be a million reasons. Television shows us what it wants us to believe. It sometimes gives us the numbers, the cause, the purpose, the goals, etc, but where is the true context? In terms of television, the only way to know for sure, is if it was a revolution of one person and it came directly from his/her mouth. Even then they could be lying! In which case, you would never truly know what it was all about.
Years after “The Revolution Will Not…” was written, Heron shed some light on it’s meaning. He said that, “modern revolutions take place in the mind”. This cuts to the heart of the role that the media (and specifically MSN - Mainstream News) plays whenever it goes anywhere near uprisings, protests and revolutions. MSN wants to control your mind - it’s as simple as that! The only time you will get close to understanding what is really unfolding during an uprising, is if it matches with their agenda and suits their purposes.
The current “Occupy Wall Street” campaign has finally gone global and MSN does not have a clue what to do about it! It may have started as a protest against the”1%” that controls the world economies, but it has become (nothing short of) a mass social awakening. Beside the financial issues of unemployment, job losses, austerity measures, healthcare, pensions, student debt - that have been on display, there are also people taking about censorship, government corruption, oppression, slavery and imprisonment. There are anti-war campaigners, civil liberty groups, anti-nuclear groups, 9/11 truthers, anti-N.W.O. protesters… It is an amazing sight to see and it’s still growing in numbers.
Naturally, many will not realise this. The MSN has it’s own varied takes on the matter and quite frankly, if it wasn’t such a serious matter, their coverage would be laughable. Several news outlets have ignored it as much as possible and when they couldn’t, their approach was typically dismissive. American MSN (FOX, CNN, MSNBC, etc) coverage centred on painting campaigners as “Hippies, Students and Antagonists” who “stunk of sweat and urine”, whilst “sitting around playing Peruvian Bongo drums”. One anchor said it was time that they “stop crying and leaching off hard working tax payers, so that you can hang out, like hippies, complaining on Wall Street”. Another said that the those involved were “nasty and ridiculous”. All this from the great minds behind a multi-billion dollar funded, social engineering, mind control Psyop. They certainly got bang for their buck! I personally find it utterly offensive and derogatory.
In the UK, ITV and SKY have also avoided it where possible. They have bombarded us with 20 minute long stories about Wooten Bassett, the ‘tragedy’ that is the resignation of Liam Fox and (in the case of SKY) hours of coverage of the trial of Michael Jackson’s doctor! On Saturday 15th October (the big day for the campaign), one outlet stated that the total number of campaigners in London numbered just over a hundred people. This was clearly a lie. Many reputable web sources can prove that the number was a LOT more.
The BBC probably realised that not discussing it was damaging their credibility (as if they have any left!) and decided to give the protests SOME attention. However, within every report was the conviction that the movement was “disparate, with no real coherence”. They also showed (on what seemed like a loop) a alleged ‘campaigner’ who said, “When people lose faith, the only option is to riot!”. There’s that old BBC favourite again - Riot…
Despite MSN’s attempts to underplay the significance of events, the scale of it is getting through. Both RT News and Press TV have devoted significant time in their schedule to show the numbers involved and report some of the lesser known occurrences. It seems that by weekend’s end the number of cities that played host to some form of protest, was over 1500. I have extensively sourced the locations and have put together a US and Europe map to give you an idea of the scale. It is by no means definitive though:
This is doesn’t even include cities in the Middle East that have taken to the streets in solidarity. There has also been numerous cities in Australia, Japan, Thailand, New Zealand, Hong Kong, to name a few that have participated. A huge number of cities in Latin America have also taken part in the weekend’s campaign.
RT News has also reported some interesting factors. In London, police have used the controversial “kettling techniques” on protesters. In Rome, police used tear gas and water cannons against them. There are also claims from several eye witnesses of ‘agent provocateurs’ in Rome. The strangest case occurred in New York when 20 people were arrested by police for attempting to withdraw their savings from Citibank! WHY?!
The movement has suffered some criticism for appearing leaderless. I actually prefer it this way! Leaders are often nothing more than puppets of the hidden controllers. There is no way to be sure that any form of leadership that comes to fore, will not be usurped in the ‘usual’ way. This movement needs time to grow for it to be truly realised. It may be that the very thing that I often hope for: “conscious (not conscientious) objection and rejection of control”, can grow out of this. Who knows… When somebody does come to the plate, I hope they stay true to their convictions and the spirit of the movement.
Patience allows growth. When you leave your parents for the first time, it’s very tempting to run back for safety. We have the chance to outgrow our masters, whilst avoiding becoming them ourselves. I have strayed a little from MSN in this post. Despite being connected, the “Occupy” campaign is too important to ignore…
Till Next Time.
Namaste and Peace Out!
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
In preparing some articles about Media Censorship and Bias, I have heard some news today that I felt needed bringing to the top of the list. It easily serves a contextual footnote to my forthcoming posts and complements the ongoing “Media War Against The Mind”, that is now reaching alarming levels of obviousness. Maybe not obvious to everybody, but more and more people are doing a ‘double take’ in reaction to apparent contradictions, one-sidedness and, often, bare faced lies in ‘Mainstream News’ (MSN).
The current news relates to the Iranian news broadcaster Press TV. All news outlets have an agenda of sorts, they only vary in degrees. There is no such thing as an independent news media. Discretion is always the watchword. It’s pretty obvious (to me anyway) that certain US and UK outlets (who shall remain nameless) should be avoided where possible, for they serve little more purpose than an Agenda orchestrated Psyop. The only valuable reason to keep an eye on them, is to observe the mechanisms of the said Agenda.
Censorship perhaps?!
Till Next Time (I hope!),
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
To paraphrase a well known saying, “the road to enlightenment is paved with varying intentions”. Whilst we on the road of truth and discovery sometimes lambaste those with a dark agenda, we are equally guilty of having ulterior motives. Granted, they may not be vicious, evil or manipulative… but we do have them. My intention here at The ‘Guide has always been to show those who may not grasp the full scope of the global agenda, a little evidence for the case. My hope is that this may spur them on to find some greater truths. I also hope that, through mass awareness, the people will recognise the systems that control them. Maybe if enough people can’t be fooled anymore, the agenda players will eventually find it impossible to proceed… and the mechanisms and goals will collapse under their own weight.
This had led me to a degree of belief and faith!… something I once thought impossible. I’ve always believed that knowledge and awareness is enough to find the greater truths. This may have been tainted by my misunderstanding of the term ‘belief’. It is a word I generally associate with religious / spiritual concepts or scientific principles, given that both require a degree of faith. Both Science and Religion require an unwavering faith in established principles. Both allow for reconfiguration if the circumstances change, but the belief always remains.
The underlying principle is a degree of conformity to these beliefs and it is here that I struggle. Conformity has never been my strong point because not all principles of conformity are flawless. Religion rests on so few evidential facts… Science constantly changes the rules… How can we place our faith in so little. Faith is not blind, but it does suffer from tunnel vision!
What is largely ignored, is the alternate path. Spiritual beliefs that exist away from organised religion can be tailored to accommodate and enhance our existence, without caging us. In much the same way, Fringe and Esoteric Science allows for the capacity to contemplate inconceivable notions… notions that allow us the imagine the impossible. Like organised Science and Religion, this path is also not without it’s flaws. It opens itself up to cranks and fly-by-night merchants who prey on those desperate for quick answers. But it is, free of dogmatism.
The great truism of existence is that we all desperately need answers and aspire to meaning. Today, more than ever in history, people need to know that all the suffering and confusion was not in vain. This is where I get controversial… however remember that this is simply what I believe. I don’t wish to take anything away from others.
The ‘true’ great truism is that the answers (mostly) are not there to be found… not anytime soon anyway. This doesn’t mean that we should give up though. For if we cant find out what life IS, we can definitely find out what it is NOT. Take truth seeking for example: I don’t know definitively what happened on 9/11 (the cause, the motive, the culprits, etc). But I DO know that it was not what they told me. I know something was covered up and until they can prove without a shadow of a doubt that it was not what the truth community (whichever belief you hold) believe… I will hold fast to mine. I personally don’t think they’ll manage it though!!
Sceptics and Believers alike,
Peace and love to you all.
Till next time!
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
Reading between the lines is sometimes the only way to get an idea of the bigger picture… the hidden agenda, as it were. Such is the case with the 2010 document: “Global Governance 2025: At A Critical Juncture” . This curiosity is the brain child of a collaboration between representatives of the US National Intelligence Council (NIC) and the European Union’s Institute For Security Studies (EUISS). The former is very important, not only because it falls under the control of the US President, but also due to the direct connections it has with the National Security Council, the Homeland Security Council, the National Intelligence Program and numerous branches of the US intelligence community. The latter is also hugely influential in matters of European security, defence and intelligence.
“Global Governance” also had extensive input from the Atlantic Council of the US (ACUS), The Trans-Atlantic Policy Network (TPN), The US State Department, The Committee On Foreign Relations of The European Parliament, The Centre on International Co-Operation (New York University), The World Economic Forum, PFC Energy and contributions from 8 different multi-national organisations involved in international affairs, media, research, strategy and security studies. So “Global Governance” is no hoax document!
Despite being largely unknown to many and almost totally ignored by mainstream media, the document is totally unclassified and easily downloadable from the internet. In fact, it has been estimated that there are over 5.5 million articles written on the net about “Global Governance”. So what is the significance of this opus?
Upon initial reading, there appears little that is damning about the contents. However this impression is extremely misleading. The report represents one of the first ‘official’ partnerships between US and European institutions, although anybody who knows anything about the history of The Bilderberg Group (for example) knows that that a document like this is simply building upon what has been a long established collaboration… and a, just as long, established agenda for global affairs. Like many other “damning documents”, it also makes use of a complex system of forecasting (or creating) trends and future shocks.
The report was created “to assess the framework and long term prospects of a global governance process”. It makes numerous references to an “international agenda” applied with “mutually agreed instruments”. However, it also goes out of it’s way to stress that it is not a proposal for ‘Global Government’, which the authors claim is a totally different and undesired outcome. What is being said here is technically true.
For a long time, I have been frustrated with certain notions that The New World Order or Agenda is a plan for a single government, single authority, single currency, etc. and taken, by some, literally. I have always believed that the agenda is a multi-tentacled beast, with no obvious face and certainly not wielding such obvious and blunt weapons as a global ‘whatever’…
In line with my belief, “Global Governance” seems to confirm this. With a universal agenda, it doesn’t matter how many faces there are, they’ll all be ultimately dancing to the same tune. The report states that “the main risk to be averted is the creation of different formats that mirror competing geopolitical conditions. Such a development would defeat much of the basic purpose”. It asserts that “a needed precondition is for all the stakeholders to trust the system, commit to collective action, and accept stronger perogatives of international institutions over their domestic governance”.
Initial to the process are organisations such as the G8 and G20, The BRIC countries, the IEA, OPEC, the OECD, the IMF, the Federal Reserve, The World Bank, etc. Regarding the perceived idea of G20 currently being centred on economic matters, the report states: “as issues become challenging or crisis driven, common interests may expand beyond facilitating an economic recovery, requiring the G20 to expand it’s AGENDA further”. You don’t have to be labelled a “conspiracy theorist” to see this happening right now.
Key also, is the involvement of NGOs (Non Government Organisations) and embracing “hybrid, public-private partnership (PPPs)… emerging as an important feature of global governance innovation”. Under the proposed ‘agenda’, it is interesting to see that the report notes: “There is institutional Darwinism and we will see the survival of the fittest institutions”. The rhetorical question should be asked, who sets the standard of ‘the fittest’? Those dictating the agenda presumably…
It also strangely refers to other institutions such as international business, big pharma, security agencies, the media and crisis management outfits like WHO and FEMA, as integral to the overall process. In relation to this, “Global Governance” hammers home this idea of ‘global threats’. Terrorism is obviously discussed, but also ‘Climate Change’, energy security, overpopulation and migration, dwindling resources, threats from biotechnology, infectious diseases and pandemics. This is where the report seems to have an epiphany of multiple “new pearl harbour” musings. An air of foreboding and fear is created in these discussions, however one conclusion is reached in relation to all these aspects: being able to control the outcome would ultimately advance the agenda.
On the matter of terrorism, security and potential state conflicts, a “proactive management of state fragility” is proposed. Including “political intervention” and “the threat of or use of military force”. This one speaks for itself really. The Japanese participant in the report, tellingly reveals “the world will be a sad place if by 2025 we have not legalised quick military intervention for humanitarian causes in case of failing states. We will need a new legal system for sending quick military intervention squads”. Humanitarian my arse! It’s just an excuse for quick regime change in those regions that won’t capitulate to the agenda.
Regarding ‘climate change’ (or more accurately, the myth of it), there is another example of seizing opportunities (engineered or otherwise): “a crisis such as an environmental catastrophe… could spark co-operation”. As for an event triggered by a bio weapon: “ a biological attack has a psychological impact that outstrips lethality, placing democratic governments under severe pressure to respond forcefully”. Is this a false flag event in the making?! Notice the emphasis on “psychological impact”…
In relation to the health of the population, “Global Governance” praises the work of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and their work with the Global Alliance on Vaccines and Immunizations. Firstly, I wouldn’t touch Bill Gates with a barge pole and I trust vaccination programs even less. Never the less, the report does mention flu pandemics and emerging diseases on several occasions… and emphasises that prevention is paramount.
The report also mentions that “rapidly falling costs will bring biotechnology within reach of the hacker community”. A remark presumably designed to point out that such advances can only be safe in the hands of the ‘agenda’ players. However, I don’t feel very safe when they make comments like: “future capabilities open the possibilities for designing humans with unique physical, emotional or cognitive abilities”. Sounds like The Borg to me!
One thing that all “Damning Documents” have in common, is the crucial role that modern communications and media outlets will play in shaping the agenda. “Widespread use of the internet - probably has been the most important vehicle spurring the expanded role of civil society groups and public opinion at large in ‘agenda setting’”. The report spells it out clearly with the following: “persuasion and legitimacy (require) as much attention as military, economic and political weight”.
What gives “Global Governance” an edge in the ‘damning documents’ stakes, is the inclusion of several “fictionalised scenarios”. These take place between now and 2025 and are used to highlight the preferred outcome of a global agenda in the future. The scenarios are real oddities though, given that they include events such as food shortages, pandemics, economic breakdown, the rise of China as the dominant superpower, the threat of a nuclear conflict between the US and China and huge tidal waves that wipe out millions of people.
The significance of these doomsday scenarios remains unclear. Are they shock tactics leading us to conclude they can only be avoided if the agenda exists? Are they subtle warnings of false flag events to come? Who knows.
What I have presented here is only a brief overview of a handful of the main “Damning Documents“ that relate to a global agenda for the future of mankind.. To really makes sense of any document that paints a suspicious picture, I suggest you seek them out and read them for yourself.
If nothing else, they confirm what we see around us everyday.
When presented with the facts, it becomes harder to dismiss these perceptions as the musings of paranoid nutters.
I could easily be called a nutter!
But I’m a nutter in the know!!
Knowledge is power.
Till Next Time…
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
As requested, here are the links to my June/July blog series entitled "The Un-Natural War", which covers some of the aspects of the unseen and man-made war against human beings. The blog series covers Chemtrails, HAARP, Exotic Weapons, Weather Modification, Fluoridation, Aspartame, Toxic Food, Vaccinations, Swine Flu, etc.
Enjoy!!
Part 1 - Chemtrails
Part 2 - Exotic Weapons
Part 3 - Toxic Goodness
Part 4 - Vaccinations
When examining the numerous “Damning Documents” that indicate the presence of a planned global agenda, the most hotly debated is the unusually named “Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars”. For not only does the item itself convey a seemingly unconventional approach to it’s subject matter, it also has a (now infamous and ambiguous) origin story… something that I will discuss further on.
“Silent Weapons” or SWFQW, purports to be an “Operations Research Technical Manual” (TM-SW7905.1). It is dated as being produced in 1979 and is discussed by many as being part of a series of similar training manuals. Claims have been made that it is a CIA training manual issued to high level agents, though this remains unconfirmed. The document also states that the principles of the work evolved from the “Operations Research” (O.R.) developed through the strategic and tactical methodology of military management in England in WW2. This line of research is intrinsically connected to the work of The Tavistock Institute. What a lovely pedigree… if true!
I will start with a brief overview of the document, so if you’re already familiar with it and want to read the rest of my post… skip the next few paragraphs! The aim of SWFQW is to explain the processes that have been engaged upon an unwitting public in order to better distract and control said population. These processes include an advanced (for the time) system of economic engineering which incorporates varying and all pervasive degrees of social control. However, the system would be applied through a system of automation (with checks and balances), take advantage of the inherent psychological and emotional flaws in human nature (ultimately using our own nature against ourselves) and enhancing those aspects of our day to day lives that advance the “quiet war”. The masses must absolutely not become aware of this self-proclaimed declaration of war. Therefore the approach would be need to be systemic and stealthy… hence the name: Silent Weapons.
Unlike “Report From Iron Mountain“ (which only vaguely states the use of a complex system), SWFQW goes to great lengths to explain it’s included methodology and models. The declaration of a “quiet war” was made possible by advances in engineering, electronics, computing, simplex methods of linear programming, the transistor and the creation of the Maser (throughout the 1940s and 50s), combined with the Rockefeller funded: “Harvard Economic Research Project” and US Air Force involvement. SWFQW states that “the combination was irresistible”. It also states that the process was initiated at a meeting of the “International Elite” in 1954. Some have claimed that this was the first Bilderberg Group meeting, but remains difficult to verify.
What makes SWFQW more unusual is the inclusion of mathematical equations and schematic diagrams to represent the processes. “These are used to apply values to human consumption, commodities, the ebb and flow of currency, etc, to establish a model for which predictions and manipulation methods can be developed. Methods that would have a controlling effect on the people and benefit those controlling the economic system”.
It also talks about the use of economic “shock testing” (based on the aviation model of measuring echoes or reflections of the recoil impulse in airframes), “paper inductance / inflation” (exchanging true value for inflated currency), “future shock”, “computer association of personal preferences” (via UPCs, bar codes, etc.), “identifying consumers” (initially via credit cards and ultimately through a “permanent tattooed body number invisible under ambient illumination”) and finally, “balancing the system” (via gradually “killing off the true creditors of this exchange” - the public).
What has truly earned SWFQW it’s damning label, is the “ruthlessly candid” approach it takes… “with no agonizing over religious, moral or cultural values”. It makes numerous references to the people as “beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent”, that a “world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals”, and that “low class elements… must be brought under control, i.e., must be housebroken, trained and assigned a yoke and long-term social duties from a very early age”.
The document also discusses the finer details of specific factors in the process. Monitoring all associations, relations, communication, loyalties, documentation, banking, assets, debts, claims, eating and drinking habits, fuel consumption, entertainment likes and dislikes, religious faiths, political tendencies, hobbies, hospital records… in fact every aspect of our lives in relation to this continuing system. It also proposes creating controlled situations such as: the availability of opportunities and commodities, output of advertising, news and the media, emotional distraction and the disintegration of the family unit.The ultimate goal seems to be the creation of ignorance, preoccupation, conformity, apprehension, and isolation; and the removal of self identity, defence mechanisms, faith, knowledge, awareness and social cohesion.
SWFQW’s opening passages make a claim of authenticity, based on the inside knowledge of several (one retired) individuals employed by or connected to Military Intelligence. For a long time, the story of it’s origins, placed it’s discovery in an old surplus IBM copy machine (in 1986) by a Boeing Aircraft employee. This story was never truly substantiated though. Through inclusion in his various writings, some have laid claim of authorship at the feet of William Cooper (of “Behold A Pale Horse” fame), although he has fervently denied this. Another writer, Delamar Duverus (of the American Sunbeam), was also associated.
It seemed for a while that the mystery had been put to bed, when one Hartford Van Dyke stepped up to the plate. However, this is where the story starts to be become, at worst, murky; at best, truly Twilight Zone! Maybe I have been negligent in my research or I‘ve simply overlooked some information, but I can’t seem to get a consistent profile of Hartford Van Dyke. He appears to be an enigmatic and factually elusive fellow, who’s story initially appears contradictory from source to source and finally seems to vanish off the face of the earth.
From 2003 onwards, one Joan d’Arc (a writer for Paranoia Magazine) began researching Van Dyke in relation to SWFQW. This lead the publication of some letters written by Van Dyke (who was, at the time, involved in a legal dispute that led to a prison sentence), where he claimed to be the document’s author. He explained how his father had been involved in the true history of the “Pearl Harbour” incident. His father’s silence, regarding his knowledge of the incident, spurred Van Dyke Jr. down a ‘truth’ path.
Van Dyke claimed that he came clean about SWFQW, after somebody voiced concerns regarding it becoming a source of disinformation. He mused on how, in the early days, he had distributed numerous copies to several individuals. One such person was a military officer at McChord Air Force Base, Washington. It has been debated that this may have been the source of the ‘IBM Copy Machine’ story.
Van Dyke’s character and credibility has been coloured by much speculation. He has described himself as a "Non-Union Lawyer" and also as a "Commercial Lawyer", an exponent of the Commercial Lien Strategy of placing liens on law-breaking public officials on account of specific wrongdoing. It seems that this may be the reason for his incarceration, although he has never been fully specific himself about this. One source claimed that the official federal courts website contained the details of his trial, although a thorough search shows nothing relating to him. It seems that around the mid 2000s, he was still in prison…corroborated by letters he wrote about a hunger strike he had partaken. Although unsupported, one individual claims he was still in prison in late 2008. Other than this, I can find nothing more concrete. Is he still in prison? What was the true nature of his crime? If anybody knows, feel free to comment.
His crime may relate to allegations that have been levelled at him from other sources. One website claims he was allegedly convicted of "trying to pass $3 million in bogus currency that featured a photo of the Queen of England". Another site connects him with Roger Elvick, who some credit as the founder of the “Redemption Process” or “Commercial Redemption”. These movements connect to the fraudulent nature of The Federal Reserve and aspects of the current legal and economic system, amongst other things. Others have associated Van Dyke with the “Freeman On The Land” movement. One, bizarrely, claims he is a proponent of The Theosophical Society! Those who have an interest in decrying Van Dyke’s claims seem to support him and vice versa. The whole thing is puzzling and for these reasons, I simply don’t know what to think about his claims of authorship.
Regardless of ownership, some have questioned the authenticity of SWFQW through it’s use of terminology and language. Some say that it is clumsily written. Others say that a government or think tank document would not use terms such as: “ruling elite” and “pecking order”. There are also the references to UPCs, bar codes and credit cards… which some say didn’t exist at the time. If SWFQW was written in the late 1970s, then they were all in existence. Even if written earlier, there is evidence of these inventions from the 1950s onwards… even if only small scale applications or theoretical.
There is also the question of the equations and diagrams. A few weeks ago I spent a huge amount of time contacting some trusted individuals who were either trained, educated or worked in the fields of electronics, mathematics, engineering, physics, etc. I also contacted some fellow truth researchers who had a similar background. Not everybody got back to me (fair enough, they’re busy people!), but a good few did (many thanks… you know who you are!). There were also a couple of other people that I’ve more recently got acquainted with and wanted to speak to on the matter, but time was against me! Not having a huge understanding of this area (I get the basics!), I wanted to pick the brains of some reliable and learned folk. I posed the question: (trying to ignore the nature and implications of “Silent Weapons”) Do the included equations and diagrams have a basis in fact?
The almost unanimous conclusion was this: taken alone, the equations are difficult to dismiss. They do have a fundamental grounding in electronic, mathematical and scientific principles. They are not simply gibberish. Whoever conceived them, knew what they were doing. What did surprise me was: they all (even fellow researchers) did not want me to refer to them individually for fear of damaging their credibility. Maybe that was because of the context in which I’m writing… who knows, but I will respect their wishes.
Lastly, there is the obvious factor. It’s not proof, but it makes you wonder. Above and beyond most damning documents, “Silent Weapons” shows an incredible amount of foresight regarding the times we now live. We have all become prisoners of a corrupt and corporate banking system that exists on the principles of usuary, paper currency with no intrinsic value. We have a system based on inflation and interest rates, that would not continue without debt, loans and bailouts. We may as well have a currency system based on the value of pin pong balls for all the good it would currently do us. More tellingly, few ordinary folk realise the scale of obfuscation regarding this monetary enslavement.
It is the quintessential ‘Silent Weapon’…
Furthermore, the degradation of our privacy, communities, emotional and psychological well being, independent media and culture is shockingly real. Even if “Silent Weapons” doesn’t exist as a bona fide “official” document, it still serves as a stark reality call regarding the world being pulled over our eyes today.
Next Up: Global Governance 2025
Till Next Time!
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
For anyone who spends anytime looking into aspects of a hidden global agenda, they will inevitably encounter a document entitled “The Report From Iron Mountain”. Whilst some have debated the validity of the ‘Report’ (including claims of genuine authorship, which I shall come to later), others cite it as an example of those, in the upper echelons of power, postulating strategies that could be implemented to advance the cause of an agenda.
Report From Iron Mountain was released into the public domain in the mid-1960s via one Leonard C Lewin. Lewin purported to have met with an acquaintance, who he ambiguously named “John Doe”. It seems that “John Doe” wanted to remain anonymous because of his alleged connection to The Report. Doe claimed to be one of 15 prominent individuals who had been approached to form a think tank called “The Special Study Group”. The group would be given unrestricted access to both top level documentation and any ‘expert’ who could assist with their research. The purpose of this research was to investigate alternate social, political and economic replacement systems that could be implemented, should the world achieve a state of “permanent peace”.
The Report claims that the Special Study Group met regularly for two and a half years before producing the final report. Doe claimed that the first and last meetings were held at Iron Mountain, an “underground nuclear hideout for hundreds of large American corporations” with “substitute corporate headquarters“, near Hudson, New York. It was at the last meeting here that the group debated the issue of The Report’s disclosure. Despite the group never explicitly being charged with (or sworn to) secrecy, the group decided it should remain classified. Only Doe believed that it should go public. The final report was submitted to the government ‘Interagency’ and shortly after both the said agency and the study group decided it should be suppressed indefinitely.
Whilst much of this could be accused of being plagiarised from the elaborate plot of a James Bond novel, it was the tone and content of the ‘Report’ that raised alarm bells for some. The document uses an almost unemotional, surgical and strategic like approach to analyse the potential systems that could replace the need for a military (and the global dependency on it) during permanent peacetime. Some of these replacement systems are shocking in their implications…
The Study Group takes it as a given that the entire global system would fall into wreck and ruin if “peace broke out”. The Report details how politics, society, culture, belief, economics and nation states are totally dependant on or connected to the military system and the need for war to allow it to function fully. It also highlights how global systems of codified law, institutions of policing, emergency war powers, distribution patterns, the class system, etc, had all been established and maintained via a model akin to “military victors dealing with defeated enemies”. Therefore, a military style contingency model or “war system” would need to be established as an inevitable replacement.
The first area of scrutiny is “Economic”. The Report claims that economic systems need to be inherently “wasteful” to survive: “modern industrial societies can be defined as those which have developed the capacity to produce more than is required for their economic survival”. It also surmises that “most of the major industrial advances known to history, beginning with the development of Iron, could never have taken place” without a war system. Whilst it would be difficult to argue with certain aspects of this notion, the alternatives proposed are surprising to say the least.
The initial proposed scenario of a social welfare system that gives everybody instant access to complete medical care, a full (degree level) education, housing (clean, comfortable, safe and spacious), mass public transportation, clean water, food, expanded forests and parks, the total end of pollution and a societal wide elimination of poverty (including a guaranteed annual income); appears Utopian. It was ultimately dismissed by the Study Group. Not because it wouldn’t work, but because it would only work in the short term. With all problems sorted, what would money be spent on next?! It is shocking to think that this proposal is considered “inadequate because it would be far too cheap”! The Report then considers the “development of a long range sequence of space research projects with largely unattainable goals”. It also considers the development of a “giant antimissile / missile complex”. Do either of the latter two sound familiar?
The second area is “Political”. This looks at the nature of national sovereignty and how nations need to be pitted against each other to create a “political authority from some source”, without resulting in a war scenario. The report considers a “well armed international peace force” little more than a military operation in disguise. It does wonder whether this could be combined with a large scale “economic threat”, but surmises that it would lack the “capacity to evoke credibility”. Something resembling this scenario is, coincidentally, playing out today.
The Report then discusses some shocking possible means to create political stability. “Uniting mankind against the danger of destruction by ‘creatures from other planets’”, whilst connecting the UFO phenomenon with this system to add legitimacy and commencing a program of cultural and artistic zeitgeist that could stir fear and apprehension in the population. The Report proposes that a similar scenario could be played out with the use of purposeful pollution that would heighten fears regarding Global Warming. In any case, the final conclusion here, is that “such a threat will have to be invented, rather than developed from unknown conditions”. If true, the implications of this scenario would be huge…
Next up is “Sociological”. Here, a non military-national service, to deal with “undesirables”, is discussed. Under this heading are: “the socially disaffected, the economically unprepared, the psychologically unconformable, the ‘hard core’ delinquents, the incorrigible ‘subversives’ and the rest of the unemployable”. It then points to the benefit of population control: in the form of artificial insemination, birth control medication that could be introduced through “water supplies and essential foodstuffs” (which the Study Group claim is already in development) and a “direct eugenic management” of population growth. The notion here is that “excess population is tar material”.
The document then touches on “Cultural And Scientific” aspects, with the opinion that the arts (without the stimulus of a war system) would become hollow and vacuous, serving no other purpose than merely decorative. Sadly, we are gradually seeing this today: in our music, art, television, cinema, literature, etc. It’s not happened totally, but it’s getting there.
The Study Group also talks about a modern social and psychological form of “slavery” that could act as an inhibitor. They surprisingly refer to the works of Wells, Orwell and Huxley, but point out that a modern system would need to utilise a modern “mythological or religious structure”. If true, I wonder at this point whether modern mass media and information dissemination has become a principle conduit of sociological and psychological slavery. Within this context, The Report’s idea of establishing the “antisocialist” and “undesirable” aspects of society as the “alternate enemy”, has credence.
Bizarrely, The Report then highlights “social purification” and “blood games… in the manner of The Spanish Inquisition”…
The final aspect is “Ecological”, where The Report reiterates various aspects already covered in the previous sections. It does make a strange comment though: “It must be kept in mind that the momentum given to scientific progress by the great wars of the past century, and even more by the anticipation of World War 3, is intellectually and materially enormous”. People wanted a World War 3?!!
The Report’s conclusions generally consider a military system as the preferable scenario. The Study Group does believe though, that the alternatives they presented are credible and realistically attainable if necessary.
Report From Iron Mountain (allegedly) contained, within it’s entirety, 604 exhibits of statistical support date. The Study Group claimed that these were left out for the purpose of “non-technical” people. These addendums have never surfaced, which has fuelled speculation about The Report’s nature as a possible hoax.
Additional to this data was a preliminary manual that explained a forecasting technique / information system (called Peace Games”) that was developed help The Study Group to “approximate the effects of disparate social phenomenon on other social phenomenon… a superior capacity to interrelate data with no apparent common points of reference, using algorithms”. John Doe claimed that The Advanced Research Projects Agency (Department Of Defence), General Electric and several other organisations had developed similar types of systems. To this day, no system labelled “Peace Games” is known (publicly) to exist, although it may exist under another name. The science of statistical forecasting has come a long way since the 1960s, although accuracy seems to be largely dependant on established rules, laws of nature, cosmological constants, etc. Some claim that Futurology or “Future Studies” and the ability to forecast more long term scenarios, has moved the science forward in other areas. Note has also been given to the mathematical study of optimising objects, called “Game Theory”. Are any of these areas related to “Peace Games” system? It is possible… but without harder evidence, it remains pure speculation.
The Report itself has languished in controversy ever since Leonard C Lewin himself claimed that “Report From Iron Mountain” was a hoax, that it was meant to be a social and political satire and that he authored it. Many ‘mainstream’ websites label the book as fiction (under the subheading of satire), but this hasn’t stopped many from believing that it’s origins are much more suspect.
In November 1967, “US News And World Report” claimed to have had confirmation of the reality of The Report, from a government official. It is also claimed that when President Lyndon Johnson read the report, he “hit the roof” and ordered it suppressed for all time. Several sources were also said to have revealed that orders were sent to U.S. embassies, instructing them to emphasize that the book had no relation to U.S. Government policy. On November 26, 1976, Harvard professor John Kenneth Galbraith. Galbraith cited the report's authenticity “because he had been invited to participate in its creation; that although he was unable to be part of the official group, he was consulted from time to time and had been asked to keep the project secret”.
There is also the strange remark in the report relating to “the breakdown of ecological balance anticipated after a thermonuclear war”. The Report claims that (under DOD guidance) the RAND Corporation had “planning under way” and that the DOD had “begun to stockpile birds, for example, against the expected proliferation of radiation resistant insects, etc”. A few years ago, an anonymous researcher claimed to be able to confirm this project, allegedly labelled “Operation: Keyhole”. The identity of this individual has never come to light and his research has subsequently disappeared from the internet. If anyone can shed any light on this, please let me know. It may be something that could confirm or deny the authenticity of The Report.
Finally, we also have reference to a location called “Iron Mountain”, near Hudson, New York… an underground bunker like vault of corporate information. Whilst I don’t wish to infer that the following organisation is the Iron Mountain named in The Report, there is a company called “Iron Mountain“, which was founded in an underground facility near Hudson, New York, in 1951. The company stores and maintains materials for clients, including records, electronic files, medical data and e-mail, according to one of it’s annual reports. It works with more than 150,000 corporations in North America, Europe, Latin America and Asia Pacific. The company went public in 1996 and joined the S&P 500 Index in January 2009, according to the filing…
The reason that Report From Iron Mountain elicits a shocked response from many, speaks for itself really. The glorification of a War System, the dismissal of a far reaching and poverty removing Welfare System because it is “too cheap”, false flag threats, fear induced trauma, slavery, the list goes on. Whilst I do concede that I can’t prove “The Report” as genuine, I find the huge number of coincidences telling. It can’t really ALL be coincidence that the systems proposed, now seem to be in existence, 50 years later…
Can It?
Next up: “Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars”.
All The Best,
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.
Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html
