The Star Trek Agenda - Truth Juice Birmingham - videos now available on YouTube

I have uploaded 'The Star Trek Agenda' to my YouTube page. The videos were recorded at TruthJuice Birmingham on Tuesday 5th August 2014.
Please watch and share far and wide. The links are below.
Part 1 - http://youtu.be/Wz6NkjxNWJA
Part 2 - http://youtu.be/z2gYH2GKIGM
Many thanks for all your continuing support!
Carl James.

Carl James' The Star Trek Agenda at TruthJuice Birmingham

Apologies for not posting these details sooner- it has been a hectic week. I've just kicked off my new talk entitled "The Star Trek Agenda". Many thanks to those people who braved the frosty reception of the venue owners so as to attend the talk in Lichfield last night. I really appreciate you coming and expressing an interest in my research. For those of you in this part of the UK, I will be speaking at TruthJuice Birmingham on Tuesday 5th August. This is an excellent venue attended by many bright and open minded people - a great place to strike up interesting conversations about the proverbial "bigger picture". The talk will start around 8pm at Kings Heath Cricket & Sports Club, 247 Alcester Road South, Kings Heath, Birmingham. Here are the details of my talk and the links. Hope to see you there! Carl.

The Star Trek Agenda
In 1974, Gene Roddenberry (the creator of legendary television series “Star Trek”) embarked on a journey to create the first “Star Trek” motion picture. It is known that Roddenberry was simultaneously employed by a group of new-age, space-entity-channelling, psi-enthusiasts to spread the message of “The Nine”. What is less known is that Roddenberry’s journey would bring him into contact with key figures involved with SRI’s “remote viewing” projects, the CIA’s mind control experiments, military research of exotic weapons and various other sinister aspects of the global agenda. In this presentation, Carl James will examine the finer details of these events and also explore the larger role that the “Star Trek” franchise has seemingly played in the machinations of the global power elite – such as NASA and military propaganda, secret society doctrines, the “New World Order” agenda, even the 9/11 psyop!

Artist: Carl James
Date: 05/08/14 
Time: 8:00pm
Venue: Kings Heath Cricket & Sports Club
City: Birmingham , West Midlands 
Address: 247 Alcester Road South, Kings Heath
Country: United Kingdom
Admission: £5 or £3 Concessions. Truth Juice is NON PROFIT MAKING, and ALL monies are put back into the organisation of future talks/presentations.
Age restrictions: No Minors
For full details visit:http://birmingham.truthjuice.co.uk/
http://birmingham.truthjuice.co.uk/index.php/2014/05/carl-james-in-birmingham-on-050814/

The Stanley Kubrick Conspiracy - Part 5: Like A Clockwork Orange

Stanley Kubrick approached many controversial subjects within the context of his films. He often alluded to the power and corruption of the elite, as well as the mechanisms used to maintain their power. A common theme in his films, such as “A Clockwork Orange” and “Eyes Wide Shut”, is the notion of state sponsored, often trauma-based, mind control. Before I look at these films in a little more detail, it is important to establish some generic details regarding the mind control subject.

There exists a documented history of state sponsored mind control instigated by (although far from exclusively) the US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). The CIA came into being, into 1947, as a direct result of the work and influences of The Tavistock Institute - specifically the CIA’s precursor - the OSS.
Thomas Powers, “The Man Who Kept the Secrets: Richard Helms and the CIA”, New York: Alfred A. Knopf 1979.

The CIA was forbidden from having any domestic police or internal security powers and was authorized only to operate ‘overseas’. In many regard, this rule of thumb was disregarded from the outset. Early examples of the agency’s involvement with mind control experiments include: Project Bluebird – believed to have been officially formed to counter Soviet advances in brainwashing. The extent and success of early forays is a little uncertain, although the mainstream belief has always been one of a “varied success rate” and “poor initial test results.” If this was the case, then it certainly didn’t stop the practice; in fact it flourishedhttp://www.wanttoknow.info/bluebird10pg

From the earliest stages, it appears that these projects aimed to study methods ‘through which control of an individual may be attained’. Experimentation included ‘narco-hypnosis’ which involved the use of mind altering drugs and hypnotic programming. Specialised teams were created in the CIA to travel all over the world, using newly developed interrogation and programming techniques. The practice also involved a variety of narcotics (heroin, sodium pentothal, marijuana, LSD, etc.)

Some degree of disclosure of these operations came to light in 1975 when the existence of MKULTRA was exposed by the Church Committee of the US Congress, and a Gerald Ford commission to investigate CIA activities within the United States. According to Wikipedia, “Investigative efforts were hampered by the fact that CIA Director Richard Helms ordered all MKUltra files destroyed in 1973; the Church Committee and Rockefeller Commission investigations relied on the sworn testimony of direct participants and on the relatively small number of documents that survived Helms' destruction order.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_MKUltra
"An Interview with Richard Helms" (Central Intelligence Agency – 05/08/2007):https://www.cia.gov/library/center-for-the-study-of-intelligence/kent-csi/vol44no4/html/v44i4a07p_0021.htm
FOIA MKULTRA Document Archive:http://www.abuse-of-power.org/foia-mkultra-document-archive/

Various Freedom of Information (FOI) requests eventually resulted in a small number of documents being released. MKULTRA came into being (apparently) on 13th April 1953 – although a number of insiders give an earlier date. CIA documentation describes MKULTRA as an ‘umbrella project’ with 149 ‘sub-projects’. These sub-projects include illegal and unsolicited testing of drugs, altered states of consciousness, and implementation of electronics components. Some experiments also involved “remote activation and control” of living organisms.

The phenomenon of state sponsored mind control programming does not begin and end with MKULTRA though. Although MKULTRA is perhaps the most well-known and documented, a myriad of project names (official and unofficial) have surfaced over the years, begging the question of just how far reaching these practices go.

Whilst it is believed by many that the overall goal of these projects was to brainwash individuals to become couriers and spies, some alleged accounts of extreme programming (such as Cathy O’Brien and Brice Taylor) involved examples of physical and sexual abuse and torture, as well as being subjected to occult and ritualistic ceremonies and practices. They loosely referred to their conditioning as “Monarch Programming”.
http://www.trance-formation.com/index.htmhttp://educate-yourself.org/mc/nwomcbturireview.shtml

There are claims that the practice encompassed out of body experiences, and time / space travel. It is also believed that (in some cases) the E.T. contact / abduction phenomenon is a result of some aspect of these programmes.  Some victims alleged that part of their programming was conducted at NASA facilities.

There is also an area of study which analyses the behaviour and associations of people who occupy the public stage. Dave McGowan, author of “Inside the Laurel Canyon”, presents a compelling argument – which connects various “agenda players” to famous individuals (artists, musicians, actors, etc.) who lived in or frequented the Laurel Canyon region of California from the early 1960s onward. These connections include many hallmarks of the mind control phenomenon and counter intelligence operations of the period, as well as ritualistic and occult practices.http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/

 
As a little aside, I found it interesting to discover that one particularly notable denizen of the Laurel Canyon region during this period was science fiction author Robert Heinlein. Heinlein was dubbed one of the “big three” – himself, Isaac Asimov and Arthur C. Clarke. His book “Stranger in a Strange Land” (1961) was hugely influential with many connected to the Canyon scene. (Riggenbach, Jeff. "Was Robert A. Heinlein a Libertarian?" - Mises Daily, June 2, 2010. Ludwig von Mises Institute.)

It is possible that much of what has been “disclosed” regarding mind control research may actually be a cover in itself – hiding techniques and practices that are unfathomable to the average person. These may encompass the deeper corners of the energy paradigm or extreme levels of consciousness and reality. Although some researchers have posed this hypothesis, it currently resides somewhat within the domain of speculation. Never the less, there are some worrying pointers that deserve our attention. Often times, research and development of technology from the likes of Lockheed Skunkworks and DARPA (Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency) – groups with an intricate association to the energy cover-up, for example - are baffling to say the least. Over the years, various agenda-driven agencies and groups have developed techniques such as “trans-cranial magnetic stimulation”, “microwave effects on the blood brain barrier” and “synthetic telepathy”.

On December 19th, 1971 – less than four years before the spectre of MKULTRA mind control first crawled into the mainstream spotlight - Stanley Kubrick unleashed “A Clockwork Orange” upon the American viewing public. It was released in the UK on January 13th, 1972. The film squarely tackled the paradigm of “free will” versus “state control” – in this case, the morality and dynamics of state sponsored behavioural modification and trauma-based mind control. The film’s science fiction trappings and futuristic settings are also mildly dystopian in nature.

“Alex (Malcolm McDowell), the main character, is a charismatic, sociopathic delinquent whose interests include classical music (especially Beethoven), rape, and what is termed "ultra-violence". He leads a small gang of thugs (Pete, Georgie, and Dim), whom he calls his Droogs. The film chronicles the horrific crime spree of his gang, his capture, and attempted rehabilitation via controversial psychological conditioning.”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Clockwork_Orange_(film)

The film, adapted from Anthony Burgess' 1962 novella of the same name, presented a disturbing and violent image of a dystopian, future Britain. Kubrick, writing in Saturday Review, described the film as: "...A social satire dealing with the question of whether behavioural psychology and psychological conditioning are dangerous new weapons for a totalitarian government to use to impose vast controls on its citizens and turn them into little more than robots." http://seriouslyforreal.com/celebrities/a-clockwork-orange-1971-2/
In many regards, Kubrick played with the subconscious of the viewer. Malcom MacDowell’s narration of the film forced the viewer to become unwittingly sympathetic to the central protagonist. This is unsettling, given that the character is an inherently unsympathetic, guiltless, and violent psychopath, rapist and murderer. In fact, the design and tone of the film depicts an overall landscape that is largely metaphorically devoid of humanity. Such aspects underline Kubrick’s skill as a subtle and subversive director and storyteller.
 
The central concept of the film (and novella) is rooted in the notion of behavioural psychology (see: research of psychologists John B. Watson or B. F. Skinner’s eponymous “boxes” and the practice of “operant conditioning”) and made manifested via the films’ deux ex machina: “The Ludovico Technique”. As is usually the case, the suggestion of this technique existing outside the narrative framework (in other words, “in the real world”), was dismissed as being nothing more than a “parody” of Aversion Therapy treatment –“in which the patient is exposed to a stimulus while simultaneously being subjected to some form of discomfort. This conditioning is intended to cause the patient to associate the stimulus with unpleasant sensations in order to stop the specific behaviour.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aversion_therapy
 
The work, upon which “The Ludovico Technique” was based, connects closely with the activities of those involved with The Tavistock Institute and Stanford Research Institute. A number of insiders have stated that “Ludovico” bears a striking resemblance to less publicised techniques once practiced by the CIA. Moreover, some state the technique (name and all) is a real one.

There is much controversy surrounding “A Clockwork Orange”. The realisation of the film was marred by the original state of Burgess’ novella, which originally included a final “hopeful” chapter to the story – where “free will” is shown as having triumphed over state intervention. The 21st (and final) chapter was omitted from the editions published in the United States prior to 1986. The UK version included the final chapter. It is often said that Kubrick allegedly based the film on the US version of the novella (leaving the film with a stark climax) and that he had been previously unaware of the original ending to the story. This was instrumental (perhaps intentionally) in creating a tone that manifested an infamous notoriety to the film. Following release, the UK press seemingly associated a number of instances of violent crimes to the film, claiming that individuals had aped the mannerisms and behaviour of Alex and his gang of Droogs. There was a fierce backlash against the film, often prompted by UK Parliamentary figures, mainstream media watchdogs and the various arms of censorship in the UK.

However, the origins of this furore seem to be mired in speculation. It is uncertain if there really ever were any crimes committed that were purely inspired by the film itself. In the 1999 UK documentary: “Return of a Clockwork Orange”, Robin Duval (then Director of the British Board of Film Classification”) said, “There were allegations it had invited or stimulated some yob gangs. What we don’t know, at this distance, is how true that was. I mean, there’s a… as a regulator – over a very long period of time – one thing I have learned is that it’s not uncommon for somebody who finds themselves in the dock to say ‘well guv’, it’s not my fault, I saw this movie or TV programme and I was lead to it by what I saw’… and it’s quite possible that there was an element of that with ‘A Clockwork Orange.’” (1999 UK documentary: “Still Tickin': The Return of A Clockwork Orange” - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2107788/combined

The producers of this documentary attempted to interview Edward Heath and Jack Straw (both allegedly, according to some researchers, may have helped in some manner to encourage the aforementioned ‘public outcry’), but they declined.

In the end, the film was withdrawn from circulation in the UK and it is from here on that the story becomes decidedly strange. For many years, fingers were pointed in numerous directions blaming all and sundry for the effective “banning” of the film. Even the then Home Secretary of the Conservative Government, Reginald Maudling, was alleged to have played a part.
Minister Demanded Clockwork Screening - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/677288.stm

Furthermore, the whole affair seemed to stoke the fire of film censorship and classification, perhaps even playing a part in the eventual “video nasty” controversy of the early 1980s. It is known that many VHS “pirate” copies of the film were brought into the UK from France, where the film ban was not in place. The “video nasty” phenomenon itself was a decidedly murky affair, involving thinly veiled attempts by the UK government to police the burgeoning home video market, and playing a significant role in the legacy of 21st century copyright laws. It has also been claimed that the whole paradigm was actually an experiment in social engineering: designed to generate a cultural backlash that would actually encourage individuals to embrace greater degrees of depravity and violence in television and film. It is possible that Kubrick was utilised to further any and all of these agendas. However, there is no way to know this for sure.

After Kubrick’s death in 1999, it was reiterated by his family and associates that Kubrick himself was responsible for withdrawing the film. According to film critic Alexander Walker, Kubrick was visited by Hertfordshire police, warned about “the power of the film”, and how “real Droogs could turn up on his doorstep” to threaten his wife and children. It has even been suggested, by some sources, that it was the police who decided that a measure was needed to diffuse “public negativity” toward the film. Thus the decision to pull the film was made. 1999 UK documentary: “Still Tickin': The Return of A Clockwork Orange” - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2107788/combined

In the history of film, it is almost unheard of for the director to withdraw their own film. It only ever really happens if the film is a flop and, even then, the decision is usually made by the studio financing the film. “A Clockwork Orange” was a critical and commercial success, garnering numerous awards and lining the financial pockets of Warner Brothers very nicely. Britain, after America, has always been a key source of box office income for Hollywood. Are we to assume that Warners Bros. simply asked no questions and agreed to the ban? Any film maker that can achieve such a feat must carry a lot of clout in the industry. However, this is Stanley Kubrick we are talking about!

In the late 1970s, Anthony Burgess was interviewed about the negative reaction to the film. He maintained that he had been held partly responsible by critics. However, Burgess firmly blamed Kubrick - specifically citing the non-inclusion of the final chapter of the book as the cause. “I became associated with violence because of the film. If a couple of Nuns were raped in Berwick-on-Tweed, I would always get a telephone call from the newspaper… ‘Mr Burgess, what do you think of this?’ They would never telephone you Stanley… because you keep out of the way!” 1999 UK documentary: “Still Tickin': The Return of A Clockwork Orange” - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2107788/combined


The film remained withdrawn until Kubrick’s death. Almost three decades maintaining the “ban”, is a long time to allow public animosity to die. It was revealed by close friends that just before his death, Kubrick had discussed ending the ban with Warners, Of course, his untimely death followed and Warners decided to re-release the film anyway. A number of researchers have alluded that this may have, in some fashion, added to the oddities that surround his death. As with most of his films, “A Clockwork Orange” not only makes thematic nods to the world of hidden global agendas, it also utilises visual cues. Provided one understands the relevance of secret society symbolism, the significance of the subtle pyramid shape on the brick wall of the prison yard (precisely as Alex is recruited for “The Ludovico Technique”) or the semblance of pyramid motifs and the “Eye of Horus” in the movie’s publicity posters becomes clear.

Despite all this, perhaps Kubrick’s greatest folly was yet to come. When it did, however, it would turn out to be his last.
To be continued...

http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-stanley-kubrick-conspiracy-part-1.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-stanley-kubrick-conspiracy-part-2.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/01/the-stanley-kubrick-conspiracy-part-3.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/the-stanley-kubrick-conspiracy-part-4.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/the-stanley-kubrick-conspiracy-part-5.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/the-stanley-kubrick-conspiracy-part-6.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/the-stanley-kubrick-conspiracy-part-7.html
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/the-stanley-kubrick-conspiracy-part-8.html


Kubrick Related Articles:
Updates, 6th Annual British Exopolitics Expo & More Stanley Kubrick Apollo Fakery - http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/11/updates-6th-annual-british-exopolitics.html
Foxes, Saturn, Kubrick, Doctor Who and The Singularity - http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/foxes-saturn-kubrick-doctor-who-and.html
A Movie About Kubrick Faking the Moon Landing? - http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/a-movie-about-kubrick-faking-moon.html
Stanley Kubrick - Updates - http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/04/stanley-kubrick-updates.html


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

Disney Darkside - Part Two

We know that there is truth to the concept of state sponsored, mind control experimentation. With enough time and research it cannot be disputed. Yet many alternative researchers will state with absolute certainty that Disney has a complex association with the recruitment and programming of mind control victims. Some will even say that Disney is total MK – with everything else merely a front. Whilst it is difficult to hold up the absolute proof of these claims, my gut tell tells me that there is a certain “whiff” to them. If it is ever proven to be the case, I wouldn’t be in the least bit surprised. However, for the purpose of these articles, I intent to retain a degree of caution… probably why you will encounter my liberal use of the word “alleged”!

The first time I came across any of these allegations was when I read Cathy O’Brien’s harrowing life story – “The Trance-formation of America”. Her account of ritual/sexual/occult based abuse and torture as part of her “Presidential model” mind control programming is disturbing enough. Yet within her story is a claim that many mind control victims have been conditioned within Disney associated locations, with further programme “triggers” caused by underlying imagery and archetypes seen in numerous, world famous Disney films.

In her book, she elaborates: “My Father…took us to see Walt Disney's Pinocchio, explaining that my brother and I were his puppets still in the carving stage. The distortions of reality that these and other Disney theme movies provided when coupled with my father's government trained conscious and subconscious controlling influence, began to further erode our ability to discern fantasy from reality.”

“During Christmas vacation, 1974, my father flew us all to Disney World by route of Tampa, Florida. Ignorant of geography, it did not occur to me that Tampa was out of the way to Disney World until my father drove the rented van to the gates of MacDill Air Force Base. Military personnel met me there and escorted me into the base TOP SECRET high tech mind-control conditioning facility for "behavioural modification" programming. This was the first in what became a routine series of mind-control testing and/or programming sessions on government installations that I would endure throughout my Project Monarch victimization.” She also says that at this point in her life “so far, I had only been to MacDill and Disney World for government/military programming.”

A Disney World, mind control facility…?

Further claims of this association are made within the accounts of another alleged mind control slave: Brice Taylor. In her book “Thanks for The Memories”, she says: “Walt (Disney) took me to an office… and told me that he was my real father. He said the Mickey Mouse Club was my real family--where I really belonged. Everyone was always telling me I belonged to a different family than my parents and I didn't understand, it was all very confusing. Walt Disney seemed nice but I wasn't with him very long. He called another man in and that man took me by the hand and led me away. This man was a very bad man and he really scared me. He took me into another room and gave me those view master box glasses to look into. He showed me pictures in them that were so scary that other parts of me had to come to see them. It was too much for a little girl to see. Dead things—cut up bodies, dead cats skinned with big eyeballs and their tails cut off, people cut up, etc... This event involved several of my personalities.”

Researchers of the mind control phenomenon have often spoken of this. Mary Lewis (LCSW) in “Awakening to the Realities of Mind Control” states, “Certain themes have surfaced throughout the years, which to this day continue to amaze me as I hear them over and over. The Disney Parks, MGM Studios, Disney Movies, Disney characters, and Disney songs have been used in conjunction with the programming. My understanding of this is that using such a familiar and popular theme assures that the program will be triggered easily. To anyone who is a Disney fan (and who is not), this is probably one of the hardest things to believe. However, sitting where I sit, hearing what I hear, and seeing what I see, I cannot refute this truth anymore.”

Ron Patton in his book: “Project Monarch…” writes, “Programming is updated periodically and reinforced through visual, auditory and written mediums. Some of the first programming themes included the ‘Wizard of Oz’ and ‘Alice in Wonderland’, both heavily saturated with occult symbolism. Many of the recent Disney movies and cartoons are used in a two-fold manner: desensitizing the majority of the population, using subliminals and neurolinguistic programming, and deliberately constructing specific triggers and keys for base programming of highly-impressionable MONARCH children.”

And also in “The Illuminati Formula Used to Create an Undetectable Total Mind Controlled Slave” by Cisco Wheeler and Fritz Springmeier: “This is why the Disney movies and the other shows are so important to the programmers. They are the perfect hypnotic tool to get the child’s mind to dissociate in the right direction. The programmers have been using movies since almost day one to help children learn the hypnotic scripts.”

One major aspect of Disney’s alleged involvement in this practice is The Mickey Mouse Club and the inherent “Mouseketeers” who have often gone on to become world renowned celebrities. According to Wikipedia: “The Mickey Mouse Club is an American variety television show that began in 1955, produced by Walt Disney Productions and televised by the ABC, featuring a regular but ever-changing cast of teenage performers. The Mickey Mouse Club was created by Walt Disney.”

Amongst those alleged to have been conditioned: Christina Aguilera, Britney Spears, Lindsey Lohan, Miley Cyrus, Justin Timberlake and Madonna - all with connections to Disney. We also often see bizarre situations unfolding with these “artists” in their personal lives. Many have gone through personality fracturing “breakdowns” resulting in periods of time in rehab and disturbing changes in their appearance. One of the most notable of these was when Britney Spears shaved all of her hair off. One witness, who was in the beauty shop at the time, described what Britney said as she was doing it: “She says she's tired of having things plugged into her and doesn't want anyone to touch her.” If you look at the “journey” of these “stars”, they often go through manufactured transformative phases anyway. The unplanned and downright strange ones are perhaps far more telling though.

It is argued by some that these “breakdowns” are nothing more than a manifestation of the stresses and strains that come with the lifestyle of a pop star. This may well be the case. However, they seem to happen with alarming regularity and under the most bizarre of circumstances. If this phenomenon is so pronounced, then why isn’t there a more effective mechanism within the industry to better safeguard against it?

Their “professional” image is also laced with clues to possible mind control aspects. You will often see motifs in their lyrics and music videos such as multiple versions of the artists (multiple personality disorder?), disjointed reality, self-harm, descent into mania and insanity, cracked mirrors (fractured alters), butterflies (metamorphosis), bird cages (entrapment), etc. There is often an abundance of masonic or occult related imagery, and regular nods to Disney such as the Mickey Mouse ‘ears’ or the Minnie Mouse ‘lips’. Their live performances often include strange occurrences. A good example is the symbolic “marriage” and three way kiss between Britney Spears, Christina Aguilera and Madonna.

On this subject, I must also mention Michael Jackson. There has been much speculation about Jackson’s possible programming. He had a lifelong obsession with Disney paraphernalia (particularly Peter Pan – embodied in his “Neverland” ranch) and is referenced as a mind control slave in Bryce Taylor’s accounts. There continues to be a large amount of speculation surrounding his death.

Associated imagery often permeates the music of even those who have a limited or non-apparent connection with Disney. For example, the collaboration between Lady Gaga and Beyoncé has several nods to “The House of Mouse”. There are even claims made by various researchers that more disparate artists have a connection. One such example is Amy Winehouse. With the circumstances of her sudden death already a source of discussion amongst alternative researchers, is it possible that even she was in some way “conditioned” or “messed with”? She once infamously said in an interview with Jonathon Ross that “the industry” was trying to shape her “into a pyramid”…

Cathy O’Brien named several individuals in the country music scene as handlers and victims, some of these include Kris Kristofferson and Loretta Lynn (respectively). Somebody recently suggested to me that The Muppet Show was a platform for these handlers and victims! There is an obvious association between The Muppets and Disney and they did have a plethora of guests who may fall into this category. The two aforementioned country music stars both appeared on The Muppet Show, as well as the likes of Alice Cooper, Peter Sellers and Sylvester Stallone. Many of these guests have an alleged correlation with the mind control phenomenon. This claim could also be made of another Henson/Disney franchise: Sesame Street.

This phenomenon is obviously not exclusive to those who have trod the Disney path. There are countless cases where a specific actor or musician could be cited as a possible mind control victim. However, even if Disney aren’t responsible for the direct programming of all these other individuals, we should still consider the role that Disney triggers and archetypes may have played in such conditioning.

As I discussed in part one, Disney’s output disseminates widely throughout the cultural landscape. Exposure to this material is often all pervasive, making for easy access to such possible triggers. If it exists, then it should therefore be quite apparent. I will look at some possible examples in part three.

To be continued…

Part 1: http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/disney-darkside-part-one.html
Part 2: http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/disney-darkside-part-two.html
Part 3: http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/disney-darkside-part-three.html


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html

London 2012 - Part 6: “And Finally... Some Mind Games!”

 In the last two parts of this blog series, I have suggested the ritualistic nature of The Olympic ceremonies. We have seen this many times in the past, however it was always inevitable that new levels of significance would be reached following the announcement that London would play host – London being one of (if not THE) root of the hidden global agenda power structures. The evidence that London 2012 would play such a role was pretty much shown to be case during the closing ceremony of the Beijing 2008 Olympics.

 Much has been discussed in the alternative community regarding this presentation, which welcomes the world to London 2012 in a particularly damning fashion. The clear lines to 7/7 and false flag terrorism in this “show” have been taken literally by some. “Here is a microcosmic and metaphorical version of what’s to come. You have the dark ritual energised by the trauma of death and terror.” It is clear that the inclusion of a London Red Bus, that literally mangles open, is a recreation of events in Tavistock Square on 7/7. The bus in the opening animation even includes a “can key” – on the front top-right hand corner, for opening up the bus! However, I believe this has possibly been taken too literally as a prediction of more false flag terror in The 2012 Games. There are numerous examples of occult practices where the actual traumatic act has been replaced just as “effectively” (if you subscribe to such things) by a “trigger” or a relative emotional resonance.

 This practice is eerily similar to the vast subject of trauma-based mind control. It is a controversial subject that many people have a hard time accepting as being real, yet the evidence of its existence is also very real. This is where my line of research has taken me lately in relation to London 2012 and began with some small noticeable realisations in the Beijing footage.

 The inclusion of David Beckham (‘23’ Hackney) and Leona Lewis (“Somewhere Over The Rainbow” – OZ/MK) is one small example. Several researchers have claimed that there is a possible association between these two individuals and the various mind control machinations; that have intersected both the music and entertainment “industry” ever since the inception of the MK projects several decades back. Leona Lewis was also joined by Led Zeppelin guitarist Jimmy Page – a man with questionable ties to the subject. Page has been a passionate admirer of occultist Aleister Crowley for many years.  It is rumoured that he owns a huge library of occult literature and he has all but admitted that the music of Led Zeppelin (including the song performed by Lewis and Page in the Beijing ritual: “Whole Lotta Love”) is occult and ritualistic in nature.

 This connects to several interesting ritualistic / mind control related stories. One famous example is the bizarre death of Jeff Buckley, son of Laurel Canyon frequenter Tim Buckley. The Laurel Canyon aspect is perhaps crucial giving the association between the area and the musicians of the time (60s onward), the military industrial complex, Lookout Mountain Studios, mind control, occult ritual, Charles Manson, all the deaths, the list goes on. It is a subject I will be looking at in due course, but if you want to research more, I recommend Dave McGowan’s excellent blog series “Inside the LC”. Be warned though, it is not for those prone to denial or of faint heart! http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/

 Getting back on topic, Jeff Buckley mysteriously drowned in 1997. His body was found floating in the Wolf River harbour (Memphis), home of a very innocuous (sic) pyramid shaped building. It is claimed that he walked (fully dressed) into the water, whilst chanting the words to a specific Zeppelin song: “Whole Lotta Love”…

 Jimmy Page also owned Crowley’s old home (Boleskine House on the shores of Loch Ness) for about 20 years. He once stated that Crowley was "a misunderstood genius of the 20th Century"... This about a man who once said of himself: “I rave and I rape and I rip and I rend”, and has been considered by many to be the “Wickedest Man in the World”. It is alleged that (possibly during Crowley’s ownership) horrific child sacrifices, in relation to satanic ritual, have taken place during the darker history of Boleskine House.

 There is a noticeable “child ritual” aspect to the Beijing closing ceremony. A young girl disembarks the London Bus and walks over a zebra crossing (as in 7/7, but also a freemasonic checker motif), surrounding by onlookers wearing several items of clothing with black and white checker patterns. She is given a symbolic black and white checked football and proceeds to walk on the backs of the surrounding people (now lying on the ground) back to the bus, which then splits asunder (surrounded by a crowd of trance ridden people), revealing Lewis, then Page, etc.

 I know this may sound a stretch, but I should also mention the episode of Doctor Who (“Fear Her”) which told the story of children mysteriously vanishing on a housing estate in London just before the commencement of the 2012 Games. After The Doctor had solved the puzzle, he took the Olympic torch and lit the ritual cauldron to begin The Games. As I understand it, the episodes storyline was conceived not long after London was announced as host for 2012. Hundreds of school children between the ages of 7-9 and 11-13 have been recruited for the London Olympic ceremonies and Danny Boyle has openly stated that the ceremony will 'make an indelible mark' on the children involved. So you see where I going with this…

 The sacrificial aspects are nothing new to The Olympics. One apparent example occurred in the 2000 Sydney Olympics when Australian sportswoman Cathy Freeman was symbolised as the “little poor girl who made good”. I’m not down playing her life, skills, or the tireless work she did to highlight the issues of Australian Aborigines, rather the way in which she was ritualistically used in the ceremony – walking on water, then being consumed in a cauldron of fire. I have also noted the hoopla, in the US, surrounding Lori (Lolo) Jones who will be participating in London 2012. The media obsession with her seems to be not because she is a fine athlete (no doubt she is), but seemingly because she is a 29 year old virgin! There have been some unusual discussions in the alternative community about her significance, her name (similar to Leeloo from “The Fifth Element” – who was also a virgin) and such. http://www.accesshollywood.com/olympian-lolo-jones-talks-looking-for-love-and-staying-a-virgin_article_67686

 Returning to the Beijing ceremony for a moment, there also appears to be a “butterfly” motif running throughout. The girl that passes the symbolic football (to the “ritual” child) wears a butterfly patterned dress. One or two of the female onlookers have butterflies on their dresses also. I mention this because it has been addressed by several well-known mind control victims (Cathy O’Brien and Brice Taylor) as an association with, often a “trigger” for, government / military sponsored mind control programs. Whatever your point of view on these specific accounts, the theme is often prevalent in contemporary female celebrities - often called “Monarch Butterflies” (for the “Monarch” programming).  For example, Hollywood actress Megan Fox has a discernible tattoo on her back which says, “We will all laugh at gilded butterflies”. Although it is obviously a quote from King Lear, I believe it signifies much more.

 On the subject of these alleged “triggers”, have you notice the abundance of another motif – the “rainbow”. The most recognizable example is the means of transportation for London mascots, Wenlock and Mandeville, who “ride” on “rainbows”. The association here is “over the rainbow” - as in the “Wizard of Oz”, which has allegedly been used as part of the various mind control conditioning programmes. Another of these mediums – Alice in Wonderland (“down the rabbit hole” / “through the looking glass”) will apparently feature in the London 2012 ceremonies. Remember also what I mentioned in the previous part regarding the giant beds (the tiny Alice surrounded by giant furniture) and “dream states”…

 Given the vast information available, there is one definite conclusion we CAN draw about London 2012: It will be a ritualistic event. There is no doubting that. The true nature of this ritual is a little more uncertain. In likelihood it won’t be for the benefit of the masses, given what we know of the associated beliefs and symbolic preoccupations of the ruling elite. The ritual is for their believed “empowerment” and benefit.

 With all the symbolic similarities to aspect of psychological manipulation and control of the masses, I am now wondering if the proceedings may be a large scale psychological “mind control” operation that will run concurrent with or be intrinsic to the ritual. When I look at the 13 umbrellas spinnng hypnotic spiral patterns in the last moments of the Beijing presentation, I'm convinced of this. The purpose of this procedure is anybody’s guess though.

 I do know that TV now plays a massive role in psychological and social engineering aspects – with almost everything from soaps to comedy (even the last bastion of truth - science fiction) playing a part. The effect is measureable in the mindscape of the population at large. I make no exaggeration when I say that it is a very effective form of “mind control”. The term may seem extreme, but that is ultimately what it is. The problem is that whilst it is relentlessly on-going, it is fractured and intermittent in its reach as well as subject to the whims of the masses. The last truly effective large scale, TV induced “mind-scaping” was probably Live Aid - although most people will probably assume I’m mad for making such a claim!

 To proceed with such a large scale operation you need a mass viewing audience, which I suspect these Games will get. We should also consider the technological advancements in TV today: Hi-def, 3D, etc. These make the viewing experience more immersive and realistic, therefore much more all-consuming of the state of mind an individual switches into when staring at the screen. Objectivity is often lost and the “spectacle” takes over, placing the viewer in a very vulnerable and suggestive place.

 The hidden technology of mind control has also come on in leaps and bounds. We in the alternative community often discuss microwave and sonic weapons (the sound system for “The Games” is very complex!) that have a destabilising effect on the human mind and body. We’ve also seen occasions where news presenters have just lost the plot live on air and appear very distressed, blurting utter gibberish. Remember also, the Olympic logo video that triggered numerous epileptic seizures. Reminds me of those Japanese Pokemon episodes that did the same! We should seriously take all of these factors into consideration.

So there you go. That’s my take on it all. We can’t truly say for sure until things kick off tomorrow. Even then, we may have a while to wait, with the additional possibility that (other than the “ritual”) nothing will happen… however one can never say “never”!

 One last little thing to address is the chance that all this has been engineered to affect us – the alterative community. Several researchers have pondered whether the symbolism and clues have been created and directed at those who are looking for them. Maybe they feel they don’t need to affect the masses anymore, given how effective their methods have been on the sleeping majority. Maybe the concentrated focus has now shifted onto those of us who are awakening and asking questions. As Zbigniew Brzezinski has effectively said for many years - we are the true threat to their intentions.

 It is a frightening prospect to consider that the illusory curtain has been pulled on the alternative community: that we may have played right into their hands and that what we consider a glimpse of awakening is nothing more than that which is carefully orchestrated as a "trick of the mind". We know that several areas of truth have been co-opted and managed by agents of the agenda players, which makes it even more possible.

 But what options do we have? Pack up our truth bag and leave it all behind? Put simply, we cannot take the risk that there is no truth to the beliefs of the alternative community. If there is only a miniscule chance that all is as we are awakening to believe, then we must stand our ground. I actually believe that there is too much evidence to state that the wool has been completely pulled over our eyes, as opposed to the uninterested masses.

The fact is that if ANYTHING untoward occurs (whatever it may be) we WILL know… because, for better or worse, we’re always watching them watching us.

Until next time.
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.




Part 1: "The Culture of Fear" -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-1-culture-of-fear.html
Part 2: “Zion, Messiahs, Plagues… Oh My!” -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-2-zion-messiahs.html
Part 3: "Close Encounters of the Olympic Kind" -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-3-close-encounters-of.html
Part 4: "Shadows and Symbols" -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-4-shadows-and-symbols.html
Part 5: “London Calling” -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-5-london-calling.html
Part 6: "And Finally... Some Mind Games!" -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/london-2012-part-6-and-finally-some.html

The Opening Ceremony of The London Olympics 2012 -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/the-opening-ceremony-of-london-olympics.html

The Who Sell Out - London Olympics Closing Ceremony -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/the-who-sell-out-london-olympics.html

The Paralympic Games, Saturn Worship and Other Oddities -
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/the-paralympics-saturn-worship-and.html
See also:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda:
http://thetruthseekersguide.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/science-fiction-and-hidden-global-agenda.html