Saturday 25 June 2011

The Un-Natural War - Part One: Chemtrails




   Recently, I read an amusing comment by someone on the net: “Mr Blue Sky, please tell us why you had to hide away for so long?… You couldn’t get through all the Chemtrails!”
  
   A week or so ago, I had the fortune of noticing something that I thought was really quite bizarre! I was approaching the latter hours of a nightshift, when I decided to go outside and have a smoke. It was just gone dawn and it was a gorgeous morning. The sky was perfectly blue; not a cloud in sight. The weather forecast had predicted a perfectly clear and sunny day. Indeed, the forecast maps showed no cloud cover, all day, for the whole day. Whilst dragging away to the detriment of my health, I noticed a plane going over. The plane was leaving a vapour trail in it’s wake. I thought to myself: “lucky buggers, probably off to the Caribbean!”. I knew they were departing because the jet was travelling away from the direction of Birmingham Airport (which is about 45 minutes away from where I live).



  I went back inside, but kept an eye on it through the windows. Almost an hour passed by and the trail was still very prominent in the sky. I decided to go back out (have another smoke!) and take a picture of it with my phone. Over the following hours, I left work and had a few morning jobs to do. I continued to notice a lattice of trails build up, criss-crossing the sky and continued to snap them on my phone. By mid afternoon, the sky was hazy and the sun obscured by wispy clouds, yet the weather forecast still maintained that the sky was perfectly clear!

   Anybody who knows anything, will have heard the debate over Chemtrails. I’ve taken an interest in the subject, yet I’ve always found it hard to find the definitive proof of something untoward. My gut tells me that something is amiss though. I’ve visited various sources in the past and only ever really found literary articles that support the mainstream “Contrails” view (harmless vapour trails produced in the wake of a plane’s engines, when flying through specific atmospheric conditions), whilst mainly photographs and videos (with some scientific theories) supporting the idea of Chemtrails. This is the theory that some vapour trails appear abnormal next to standard Contrails and that, with a possible combination of foreign chemicals, these trails are being created to the detriment of people’s health.

   For the “mainstream” view, I did the usual Wikipedia, National Geographic, New Science reading and came across an article from Scientific American called: “Why Do Jets Leave A White Trail In The Sky?” by Jenn Stroud Rossmann, an assistant professor of engineering at Harvey Mudd College. The webpage that hosted the article was interesting because it served as a two-halved snapshot of the whole debate. The main piece threw up the standard scientific explanations as to how the trails being formed are harmless Contrails. This article served the, almost exclusive, purpose of debunking the Chemtrail theory. Below is a section from the article:

   “Jets leave white trails, or contrails, in their wakes for the same reason you can sometimes see your breath. The hot, humid exhaust from jet engines mixes with the atmosphere, which at high altitude is of much lower vapour pressure and temperature than the exhaust gas. The water vapour contained in the jet exhaust condenses and may freeze, and this mixing process forms a cloud very similar to the one your hot breath makes on a cold day. Jet engine exhaust contains carbon dioxide, oxides of sulphur and nitrogen, unburned fuel, soot and metal particles, as well as water vapour. The soot provides condensation sites for the water vapour. Any particles present in the air provide additional sites. Depending on a plane’s altitude, and the temperature and humidity of the atmosphere, contrails may vary in their thickness, extent and duration.”

   The article continued by citing wing tipping, crow instability, wind currents, temperature layers and sublimation to explain some of the more unusual looking trails.

   Following this, were some lively and researched comments from readers, exploring the possibility of Chemtrails. Various individuals debated scientific accuracy, the amount of years that trails have been visible for (some photographs from the 50s and 60s were shown) , the increased amount today (countered by increase in air traffic), lingering trails, cruising altitudes and a Congressional Bill that was once introduced that defined Chemtrails as “exotic weapons“. They discussed the possibility of atmospheric seeding, population reduction and other ideas. It seems that the Chemtrails debate, in these comments, boiled down to a few key aspects:
  • If it is from turbulence, in combination with supersaturated conditions, wouldn’t there also be a turbulence trail from the tail of the plane? Vapour generated should be more spread out along the wings instead of coming just from the engines.
  • When spraying a substance, the trail starts out at the point of emission. Usually narrower, but the difference is quite noticeable.
  • The absence of a gap between the plane and the trails left behind. There is a gap with contrails because the exhaust vapours, that cause contrails, takes a fraction of time to freeze. Would altitude, pressure and temperature effect the gap with a Chemtrail being sprayed behind a plane?
   The truth is, I’m no scientist! Looking into it, I have to use my limited knowledge to way up the points of view on offer. My hypothesis for finding some slightly tangible proof would be this:
You have a plane producing contrails (with a gap) from the engines; under appropriate atmospheric conditions. This plane, however, is producing a secondary trail (without a gap). Atmospheric conditions would dictate that any trail from the same plane would behave in the same manner. From this, you could probably guess accurately that you were witnessing a secondary Chemtrail. I think if there is any real research to be done in this field, these are the kind of things that people need to be looking for.

   There are many sites, where you can view photographs and read articles from both sides of the fence. If you are interested in the Chemtrails theory, Andrew Johnson has done some interesting research at http://www.checktheevidence.com/ (you can also click in my Links box to the right) and is worth a look.

   In my own opinion, I do think there is something to the theory. There may not be much evidence, but the behaviour of the phenomenon can be very bizarre at times. A gut reaction is, obviously, not the basis of my opinion though. Consider this: even if you don’t subscribe to the idea of Chemtrails, the existence of “harmless” Contrails is still cause for concern. Contrails are effectively man made clouds. Shouldn’t nature be the only thing responsible for this act? As a species, we really don’t help ourselves, sometimes, by carrying out acts of “Nature Modification”. For this reason alone, I think we should keep an eye on it. And, if Chemtrails really do exist, isn’t that even more reason to be vigilant?

   Also, there has been much research done into the existence of hidden agendas and programs that are not to the benefit of mankind. Various governments and industries have never had any qualms about exposing huge numbers of the population to things like: DDTs, Agent Orange, Sarin Gas, depleted Uranium munitions, Anthrax, toxic flu vaccinations, water fluoridisation, Aspartame in food and drink, mood stabilisers…. The list is endless.

If Chemtrails are real, it’s only the tip of the iceberg…
To Be Continued…


Books available from Carl James:
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume One - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-one/paperback/product-23209429.html
Science Fiction and the Hidden Global Agenda - Volume Two - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/science-fiction-and-the-hidden-global-agenda-2016-edition-volume-two/paperback/product-23209433.html
What Really Happened at the London 2012 Olympics - http://www.lulu.com/shop/carl-james/what-really-happened-at-the-london-2012-olympics/paperback/product-23221527.html


Saturday 11 June 2011

Bilderberg 2011


   As I type this, it’s five o’clock in the morning and I’m just winding down from a gig with my band. I know I’ve got to get some sleep, but I need to cover this before the weekend is up. The reason…

   It’s that time of year again, when various politicians, business leaders and individuals of global influence get together and discuss how they can f**k up the world even more! Yes, it’s Bilderberg time. These guys are like some bastardized parallel universe version of The A Team… lock them up in a room together and they’ll come out brandishing a new global pandemic agenda or false flag operation created using only 3 rolls of loo roll, a shopping trolley and a blowtorch! I can just imagine Kissinger shouting: "I pity za fool..."

   According to various websites and investigative journalists, The Bilderberg Group are meeting this weekend in Switzerland for their annual knees-up. This years details have been difficult to keep track of. According to an article in The Independent (of all places), the 2011 meeting was touted as being held back in February. Although this amounted to nothing (possibly a piece of disinformation), there are indications that the main event in St. Moritz may not be the only venue. Rumours persist that the gathering will be spread over several locations in and around Geneva. It may be that this has been the case for several years or has only begun this year. It makes sense that they would spread themselves about, given the increased exposure that the group has attained through various media outlets.

   For those who are still unfamiliar with Bilderberg, the “official” story states that the first meeting was held at Hotel De Bilderberg near Arnhem in The Netherlands in May of 1954. Described as an annual think-tank of European and American leaders, brought together to promote “Atlanticism” and create a better understanding of cross-cultural political, economic and military issues. “The guest list was drawn up by inviting two attendees from each nation, one of each to represent Conservatism and Liberalism… At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued.” (Source: Wikipedia)

   All sounds fine so far doesn’t it? The main problem with The Bilderberg Group is the way it conducts itself in almost total secrecy. There are never any press releases of any consequence, 99% of all mainstream media treats it as though it doesn’t exist. Venues and dates are only ever found out by researchers watching the global activity of innumerable venues large enough to house the event, or if an insider decides to leak the details. Indeed, it is only due to anonymous whistle blowers that any of the meetings minutes or subject matters have reached the public domain (there is no way to be sure that those documents that have, are complete or uncensored). You might say that leaders have a right to conduct themselves in privacy?

   This is all well and good until you look at who has attended, their possible connections, the timing with which certain individuals have appeared there and finally, what is discussed.

The Cast List:   
   There have been hundreds (possibly thousands now) of attendees. Rather than list them all here, I’ll pick out a few of interest. The usual suspects with “Agenda” connections that have been in regular or semi-regular attendance include: David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Alan Greenspan, Paul Wolfowitz, Paul Volcker and Timothy Geithner.

   There has also been royalty: Prince Charles, Prince Phillip, Juan Carlos I of Spain, Queen Beatrix of The Netherlands and Prince Bernard of The Netherlands (who founded the meetings and has a direct involvement in the 1976 Lockheed affair and (allegedly) dubious connections to the German Nazi Party to his his name).

   There have been countless industries and businesses represented by their C.E.O.s including: Philips Electronics, Shell Oil, Electrolux, WHSmiths, Tesco, Kraft, Google, Heinz, Microsoft, Nokia…. The list is endless.

   Politicians include Kenneth Clark, George Osbourne, Ed Balls, Margaret Thatcher, Paddy Ashdown… again hundreds (even more of significance that I will come to in a moment).
If what is discussed is a forum of free thought and not a policy influencing/making operation, then why do these people even bother attending?! Imagine this: You own a business. Every year you get together with hundreds of other business owners and talk shop. You discuss strategy and forecasts, business models and planning. When you leave, nothing of what you have discussed will in any way whatsoever translate into the way you conduct business for the next year…

   Rubbish! The only way in which you could avoid the influence of this meeting would be to erase every conversation you had /heard from your memory. And lets face it, if you DID do that… you wouldn’t be a very good business person!

Coincidental Timing:
   One of the stranger things about The Bilderberg meetings, is there uncanny ability to predict the next national leader…  Both Bill Clinton and Tony Blair attended the year before they were elected to office. Hilary Clinton and Barack Obama attended together in the months before the 2008 US elections. Strange coincidence that!

The Leaked Minutes:   
   Despite the fact that you could dispute the authenticity of the minutes that have been leaked from several meetings, they still make for interesting reading. Iraq was discussed with a militaristic attitude prior to both wars. The Petro-Dollar system was discussed the year before it’s introduction, as was the IMF. The North American, African and European Unions were all discussed years before their inception, as was a single currency. Strange that by chance these things came to pass, after the fact.

   What is most disturbing is the language used at these meetings by certain individuals. Routes to depopulation are discussed with regularity. As is the use of the media to “better educate” people (we all know how the media “educates” us!).
With regard to publicising threats to the public, the minutes of the 1980 meeting in Aachen has a chilling observation. One individual (suspected to be Henry Kissinger. All members are listed but not referenced by name when they spoke) was quoted as saying: “If the danger is real it makes sense to warn about it; if it is not, the warning does no great harm”.

The 2011 Meeting:   
   This years agenda is worrying. Although we have no way of knowing what will be discussed overall, one subject may have an effect bigger than many of us realise. On the list for discussion this year is: Internet Censorship. I’ve noticed that Chris R. Hughes (co-founder of one of my pet hates: Facebook), Eric Schmidt (executive chairman of Google) and Jeff Bezos (founder and C.E.O. of Amazon) are in attendance, which give credence to the possibility of that subject.

   Media censorship has been banded about a lot recently. There is much interest in the privacy of those in positions of influence (a cover for censorship if ever I saw it.) and criticism of the alternative community and their awakening to the global situation. Those with “The Agenda” would love nothing more than to shut us up!

   We have it within our power to draw people to the possibility of a new perspective on the world around them. It’s daunting speaking out about such things sometimes. The fear of reprisals and intimidation kept me from putting fingers to keyboard for a long… or was it that I was just apathetic and couldn’t be really bothered! I’m very thick skinned though. I don’t intimidate easily and I’m far too long in the tooth to care what anybody else thinks of me! Unless it’s good of course!!

   Ultimately, what really matters is the truth. We can be as free as we want to be, if we care enough.

   If you want to know more about Bilderberg and its connections to the larger scope, I can recommend the following:
  • Alex Jones / Prisonplanet / Infowars (he is listed in my blog links to the right)
  • Ian R Crane (Again, in the links)
  • Daniel Estulin & Jim Tucker (Bilderberg researchers with years of experience documenting them. You can find much of their work through Alex Jones)
  • Tony Gosling and Bilderberg.org (don’t let the biblical pictures put you off! He has many of the minutes and other documents available to download for free from his site)
  • If you get the chance to see the Channel 4 Documentary by Jon Ronson called: “The Secret Rulers Of The World”, It’s worth a look as well.
   I haven’t been prompted to do so (in case you're wondering!), but I also want to do a shout out for my fellow blogger Ben Emlyn Jones and his blog: HPANWO. He’s written some very incisive stuff about The New World Order and I hope you’ll check him out by clicking the link in my Recommended Blogs box to the right.
  
   Off to bed now. I’ll either dream about a world without these power crazed maniacs or a world with that group of girls dancing by the stage last night!!
 
Till Next Time.
Fight The Power!
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.

Tuesday 7 June 2011

WANTED: Dead Or Alive! - The New World Order


   Lately, I’m reminded of a line I regularly sing when out with my band: “Meet the new boss…same as the old boss!”. If you don’t know the reference (And you should!), the lyrics are from The Who’s seminal classic: Wont Get Fooled Again. For the sake of this blog, I think they should more appropriately be:
“Meet the new Agenda… same as the old Agenda!”.

   Ladies and Gentlemen, I present to you: The NEW New World Order! Same as the old one, just given a new lick of paint and a new label. The past few weeks have presented us with an incredible and (if it wasn’t so tragic) almost comical insight into new developments forming in “The Agenda”. To the novice, it would almost appear as if the “powers that be” don’t know their arse from their head. I’m not sure though that this situation can be dismissed so flippantly.

   As I’ve written in previous posts, I tend to be a bit pragmatic and as a result I don’t buy into the whole N.W.O. zeitgeist in it’s entirety. I must be clear though: I never say I don’t believe it at all though. I struggle with some of the Annunaki bits and I also don’t buy into some of the 2012 Apocalypse / Rapture / End Times stuff (my non-denomination / almost non-spiritual ethos gets in the way a bit!). I do believe that there is an ultra powerful, minority cabal trying to steer the world according to a loose-ish plan. I call it “The Agenda“ (because agendas are flexible and subject to change), but I’m also ok with the New World Order tag.

   I read an article a few days ago (I won’t name the source because I don’t think it was worth the webpage it was written on!!), pointing out the possibility of the Euro currency collapsing and the immanent ceiling smash of the US debt. This individual pointed out a load of other old bobbins and then declared: “THE NEW WORLD ORDER (if there ever was one) HAS FAILED”.

   As I chuckled to myself I thought, “bless ‘em, if only it were that easy!”. Not wanting to be a pessimist, I really do hope the day comes soon when enough people spread the word, stand defiantly against these N.W.O. filth that call themselves human beings and finally stop them. I’m just not sure that we’re there yet though.

   Proving a “conspiracy” or cover up is the zenith of any researchers work. In my early days, I remember getting really excited when I managed to obtain the PDF minutes of over half a dozen or so Bilderberg Group meetings. I also remember how disappointed I was when I naively thought I could get the detailed minutes for every meeting there had ever been! It was rewarding though, that I had managed to prove its existence to myself and consequently opened up other roads of research.

   With The Agenda it is much harder. I sometimes wish there was a file I could present to people that has “Top Secret” across the top and has a detailed confession of intent signed by the perpetrators. I am convinced The Agenda exists (you can see the ramifications all around us every day through political, military and commercial conduct) although I think that stating the intentions and timetable of it, does the “Truth” cause an injustice. It also opens the door for articles like the one I referred to a few paragraphs back. Because it didn’t play out as we insisted, were we were wrong?… Actually, how can anybody know it’s over or never existed if we never knew what the sequence of events were to begin with?! You also have to bare in mind that those who perpetrate the agenda are not all on the same page. Perhaps their ultimate goal is the same, but their methods sometimes differ.

   The shifting of the ground in the last few weeks and months has thrown a curveball at our perceptions of this agenda. An example would be the curious chain of events regarding the International Monetary Fund (IMF) & The World Bank, which many believe to be one of the main weapons in the creation of the N.W.O. It develops with the arrest of IMF director Dominique Strauss Kahn (DSK) on sexual assault charges. DSK was believed to making plans to run against Nicolas Sarkozy in the next French presidential elections. It was also believed that DSK sought to replace the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve currency with a de facto IMFUN financial tool commonly known as special drawing rights (SDRs), a plan which China fully endorsed in 2009.

   Here's a section from an article by Victor Thorn called: “Was Arrest of Top IMF Bankster Part of Planned Sting Operation?":
“To show his resolve, DSK pulled the trigger on Feb. 10 via an IMF report that specifically mentioned the introduction of this supranational one-world currency that challenged the dollar’s dominance. CNN’s website reported the matter, as did other sources. Back in January, DSK appeared on BBC Radio to speak of his plans for a global central bank. He boasted, “Never in the past has an institution like the IMF been as necessary as it has been today. . . . Now is the time to do it, and I think we’re ready to do it.””

   To muddy the waters more so, DSK was a close friend of Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou. It is well documented that Greece has received substantial financial bailouts from the IMF (via The EU) which has failed to secure its economy. If DSK had remained in his position, it is possible the following could have occurred: Yet more bailout would be issued unsuccessfully, the US economy could have collapsed immediately and permanently, the Petro-Dollar system for trade in Oil could have collapsed and China would almost certainly become the largest economy in the world. DSK was charged with allegations though and removed from his position awaiting trial.

   This week, we’ve had an E.Coli outbreak in Europe. Ignoring the oddness that this strain is resistant to over 8 types of antibiotics (unheard of before with E.Coli), Germany and France immediately blamed Spain for the outbreak, which has had a devastating effect on their already faltering economy. Coincidence abound, Spain was also due an IMF bailout any day. The true source of the outbreak (in Germany, I believe) has been revealed and an apology issued to Spain. The damage however has been done. Russia has allegedly decided not to import European fruit and vegetables for the foreseeable future. In another twist, Spain has also been implicated (allegedly!) in the original financing of Cluster Bombs that have been recently used on civilians in Libya. Cluster Bombs are apparently illegal because the they disperse as mini-mines that can go unexploded for years.

   And it continues… Today, Germany has told various countries (those on the IMF bailout list) that they are not doing enough to reduce the deficit. They have blamed early retirement, low working hours, etc., for the economic woes (blaming the masses again!). They have also told them that they probably won’t get further bailouts and that they should consider abandoning the Euro and reverting to their former currencies! Spain and Greece have been considering this for weeks now. Indeed, 60,000 Greek protesters gathered in Syntagma Square in Athens in the last few days to voice their concerned about the economic situation.

   All this pales into the background if you consider that money isn’t really real anyway! The paper currency we use is just a usuary note based on the gold reserves that a country continuously re-loans out to all and sundry. In fact, it’s not really even that! It’s just a data transaction… But I digress into a subject for a later date! If you want learn more about the way Global Economics work, I suggest checking out Max Keiser of The Keiser Report on RT news.

   So what does all this mean? If the endgame needs all countries to lose their sovereignty, this can be achieved either through unified states (countries are totally dependent on each other to survive) OR economic isolation (countries have nowhere to turn for support). With this in mind, the collapse of economies becomes irrelevant next to the bigger picture. The individual that wrote the article I referred to much earlier in this post, pointed out that single currencies and unified countries across one continent was all part of the New World Order plan… with total globalisation and control of the world populace as the ultimate goal.

   Well the second part (I believe) is true. But I’m not sure whether one thing was mean’t to lead inexorably into the other… this was only assumed! Who is to say what the short term strategy is? Was the plan delayed or derailed at some point? This is why I refer to it as The Agenda.. Remember, it is flexible and subject to change. Regardless of the current shape of nations and economies, the road to the end was always mean’t to include: increased fear, anxiety, chaos, upheaval, uncertainty, ignorance and desperation… All in order to make us more grateful and compliant when the inevitable arrives. We’ll welcome it as our saviour with open arms! Will we S**t!! If that happens, I’m going out the same way I came into this world: kicking and screaming!

    I think what we’re seeing now is a shifting of the pieces… a transition into the next phase. We need to be mindful that even if we don’t know the shape of things to come, we must be ready. I always say this again and again, but it’s the best advice I can give anyone: Learn your stuff, be aware and spread the word. Your perception is your greatest weapon. Use it to shine a light of truth in those dark corners where lies and deceit make their abode. Use it to expose the rest that sits in plain sight... the stuff that we see, but others maybe don't.

   I’ll leave you with some gems from a truly wonderful human being (I say, as I try not to swallow my own tongue!). These are the words of the co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, Zbigniew Brzezinski:

“The whole world has become politically awakened” the people are becoming "consciously aware of global inequities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation.”
"Mankind is now politically awakened and stirring” which “makes it a much more difficult context for any major power, including currently the leading world powers.”

Let’s show him what we can do, eh?!
Till Next Time…
Peace & Long Life!
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.