Sunday, 1 July 2012

Movements... *Update*

 It has been an extremely busy couple of days for me, which has unfortunately delayed this post and the inclusion of several important links that I hoped to highlight last week. Several weeks back, I posted an article which discussed the often complex issue of movements and activism.

Although I believe that we should all do what we can to become “active” in some form, I have always remained extremely wary of the idea of running off and allying oneself with a “movement”. In principle the notion is a sound one. However, few things ever remain un-steered or agenda-less.

 I remain convinced that the vast majority of “organised opposition” is “controlled opposition”. The reasons are varied. Many who become the “shining heroes of truth” in these movements have (or have had) connections that appear a conflict of interests in relation to the cause they support. Others seem to be creating a "nexus of truth” that is equally as misleading and dead-ended as the “truths” that are peddled by governing politicians, the global corporations and the mainstream media. Well known individuals in the truth community seem to re-position themselves almost instantaneously, in a random fashion, with no obvious reasons to do so. We really should ask the question why… and by extension, how it happens? Is it a fear of being ridiculed for taking an “inconvenient” stance, or a fear of being “left behind” by the “mainstream” alternative community? It is the promise of money or access to a larger audience platform?

 Nowhere is the scope, of this kind of steering, more apparent than in relation to 9/11 Truth. When the research of Dr Judy Wood is discussed in the 9/11 Truth community, some (credit where credit is due) are open to her work, even if they perhaps don't go far enough in their support. However this is more often not the case. Reaction to Dr Wood's work (in the case of several prominent 9/11 Truthers) is a prime example of how certain individuals will go to the nth degree to discredit, dismiss, ridicule, attack, ignore, substitute or re-present the person, the work, or any other person that advocates it. There appears to be no justifiable reason as to why this continues to happen, other than the fact that certain people don't want this evidence to be taken seriously or represented accurately. What are they afraid of, and what are they trying to hide?...

 This is something that I discussed a bit with Andrew Johnson quite recently when I met up with him. It is something he has written about and spoken about over the last few years (though he said he hasn't particularly enjoyed doing this). It can be hard to get to grips with - but if you want to have a look, use this link:
There have been more recent examples of folks trying to misrepresent what has been said - and perhaps disguise this activity. This seems to have been shown in 2 recent articles, by Andrew:
"The Vancouver 911 “Hearings” - Encouraging Conjecture, Discouraging Certainty, Obscuring Known Truth" -
"Some "Psychotic-Type" Remarks About the Vancouver Hearings" -

Finally, if you haven’t already, please get hold of a copy of Dr Judy Wood’s book: “Where Did the Towers Go?” It is possibly one of the most important books that you will ever read -

It really is time that people start to wake up and see the cover-up within the cover-up. We all try so hard not to be led in life, it would be a shame if we cross the fence only to be led on the other side. Truth always begins and ends within yourself.

"Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when they are open."
- James Dewar.

Until Next Time.
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.


Christopher Dos Santos said...

Namaste brother Carl, more than once I have heard you herald the work of Dr. Wood.

In my humble opinion she offers the most thorough and intelligent rendition of what more than likely occurred on that fateful day. I am sure the book is phenomenally comprehensive, however, those of you who want an in depth purview of her work there are more than enough 2-3 hour video interviews which do include a solid photo essay complimenting the interviews. Good on you for continuing to highlight Dr. Woods work, she is a clear voice in a muddled world.

In Lak' ech, brother Carl, prosper in truth live with knowledge.

Eve said...

Hey Carl...I generally don't believe conspiracy theories. I really believe that Elvis, Marilyn Monroe and Michael Jackson are all dead...I think that global climate change is a real thing, and I do believe that 9/11 was the work of terrorists... I remember hearing the phone calls from the people that were on the flight that crashed in Pennsylvania..they went down fighting the hijackers..I don't of my sons has tried to convince me for years that it was an inside job, but I just don't buy it...any government that would sacrifice so many lives for the chance to invade a country for's unbeliveable...

The Truth Seeker's Guide said...

Thanks for the support Christopher and my apologies for the late reply.
Dr Wood's work is the most thorough and scientific approach to the subject, in my opinion. The evidence is damning in its conclusions and is the reason why I continue to support it and her.
All the best my friend.
Carl (The 'Guide)

The Truth Seeker's Guide said...

Thanks for the comment Eve.
I appreciate your perspective as I know that most people, who embark on this road of research, can remember a time when they found many "conspiratorial" notions unbelievable... myself included.
It is difficult to comprehend the scope, whys, and wherefores of such matters... especially if they throw our belief of the world in chaos. Many people can't and won't entertain such ideas for this reason alone.
I'm with you in the conclusions that (Elvis, etc.) are simply wild ideas... and they do little to add any credibilty if they are bunched together with any serious matters.
Sadly, the research into 9/11 (as one of the best examples) shows that something very underhand occured. I don't wish it to be this way (who would!) but the scientific evidence is (almost) conclusive that the event was orchestrated by persons other than those we are told of.
I am glad that that you have been open to listening to people who have raised the subject in the past and I hope that you may consider the notion again, as it really is in everyones best interests to do so if they can.
If you ever do, just ask and I can compile some very important pieces of evidence as a start point to research yourself.
However, I perfectly respect your position if it is something you don't wish to do.
Also, thank you for appoaching the matter in such a kind and non-offensive manner. You would be surprised how hostile people can be on the matter!!
All the best and enjoy the weekend.
Carl (The 'Guide)