It has been an extremely busy couple of days for me, which has unfortunately delayed this post and the inclusion of several important links that I hoped to highlight last week. Several weeks back, I posted an article which discussed the often complex issue of movements and activism.
Although I believe that we should all do what we can to become “active” in some form, I have always remained extremely wary of the idea of running off and allying oneself with a “movement”. In principle the notion is a sound one. However, few things ever remain un-steered or agenda-less.
I remain convinced that the vast majority of “organised opposition” is “controlled opposition”. The reasons are varied. Many who become the “shining heroes of truth” in these movements have (or have had) connections that appear a conflict of interests in relation to the cause they support. Others seem to be creating a "nexus of truth” that is equally as misleading and dead-ended as the “truths” that are peddled by governing politicians, the global corporations and the mainstream media. Well known individuals in the truth community seem to re-position themselves almost instantaneously, in a random fashion, with no obvious reasons to do so. We really should ask the question why… and by extension, how it happens? Is it a fear of being ridiculed for taking an “inconvenient” stance, or a fear of being “left behind” by the “mainstream” alternative community? It is the promise of money or access to a larger audience platform?
Nowhere is the scope, of this kind of steering, more apparent than in relation to 9/11 Truth. When the research of Dr Judy Wood is discussed in the 9/11 Truth community, some (credit where credit is due) are open to her work, even if they perhaps don't go far enough in their support. However this is more often not the case. Reaction to Dr Wood's work (in the case of several prominent 9/11 Truthers) is a prime example of how certain individuals will go to the nth degree to discredit, dismiss, ridicule, attack, ignore, substitute or re-present the person, the work, or any other person that advocates it. There appears to be no justifiable reason as to why this continues to happen, other than the fact that certain people don't want this evidence to be taken seriously or represented accurately. What are they afraid of, and what are they trying to hide?...
This is something that I discussed a bit with Andrew Johnson quite recently when I met up with him. It is something he has written about and spoken about over the last few years (though he said he hasn't particularly enjoyed doing this). It can be hard to get to grips with - but if you want to have a look, use this link: http://tinyurl.com/911ftb
There have been more recent examples of folks trying to misrepresent what has been said - and perhaps disguise this activity. This seems to have been shown in 2 recent articles, by Andrew:
"The Vancouver 911 “Hearings” - Encouraging Conjecture, Discouraging Certainty, Obscuring Known Truth" - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=350&Itemid=60
"Some "Psychotic-Type" Remarks About the Vancouver Hearings" - http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=352&Itemid=60
Finally, if you haven’t already, please get hold of a copy of Dr Judy Wood’s book: “Where Did the Towers Go?” It is possibly one of the most important books that you will ever read - http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/
It really is time that people start to wake up and see the cover-up within the cover-up. We all try so hard not to be led in life, it would be a shame if we cross the fence only to be led on the other side. Truth always begins and ends within yourself.
"Minds are like parachutes.
They only function when they are open."
- James Dewar.
Until Next Time.
The Truth Seeker’s Guide.